Summary:Liposomal amphotericin (AmBisome) 2 mg/kg three times weekly was compared with placebo as prophylaxis against fungal infection in patients undergoing chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for haematological malignancies. Prophylaxis began on day 1 of chemotherapy and continued until neutrophils regenerated or infection was suspected. Of 161 evaluable patients, 74 received AmBisome and 87 received placebo. Proven fungal infections developed in no patients on AmBisome and in three on placebo (3.4%) (P ؍ NS). Suspected fungal infections requiring intervention with systemic antifungal therapy (usually amphotericin B) occurred in 31 patients on AmBisome (42%) and in 40 on placebo (46%) (P ؍ NS). Suspected deep-seated infections developed in 21 (28.3%) and 31 (35.6%) patients, respectively (P ؍ NS). Time to develop a suspected or proven deep-seated infection showed a trend in favour of AmBisome (P ؍ 0.11). Fifty patients had fungal colonisation (48 with Candida spp, two with Aspergillus spp) of at least one body site during prophylaxis; 15 patients while receiving AmBisome (20%) and 35 while on placebo (40%) (P Ͻ 0.01). Time to colonisation was significantly delayed in the group receiving AmBisome (P Ͻ 0.05). Treatment-related toxicity was modest and no additional toxicity was observed in patients receiving AmBisome. AmBisome 2 mg/kg three times weekly is safe and reduces fungal colonisation in patients receiving intensive chemotherapy or BMT. However, despite encouraging trends, prophylactic AmBisome did not lead to a significant reduction in fungal infection or in requirement for systemic antifungal therapy. Keywords: AmBisome; prophylaxis; neutropenia More than half the fatal infections in neutropenic patients are due to fungi 1 with candida and aspergillus the most commonly-observed pathogens. fungal infection increases with the severity and duration of neutropenia which, in the case of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) or chemotherapy for the treatment of haematological malignancies, can range from a few days to several weeks. The severe immunosuppression induced by high-dose corticosteroids given to recipients of allogeneic BMT to suppress graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) puts them at additional risk of fungal infections 2-4 whereas for patients receiving autologous stem cell support and treatment with growth factors the risk is much lower.5 This provides a rationale for the prophylactic use of antifungal agents.Orally administered agents such as the imidazoles, or non-absorbable amphotericin B, achieve only local decontamination and have little or no impact on invasive fungal infections. 6 A recent meta-analysis 7 has been conducted of 24 trials in which antifungals were used, either as prophylaxis or as empirical therapy, in patients with cancer complicated by neutropenia. This meta-analysis showed that amphotericin B decreased mortality significantly although the studies were small, as was the difference in the number of deaths. Antifungals as a group decreased the incidence of inv...
The aetiology of EHPVO in the majority of patients remains unknown. Sclerotherapy and banding are effective treatments for bleeding varices with good long-term outcome. Procoagulant state is an infrequent cause of EHPVO in children.
An open, randomized study was performed at 18 European centres to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerance of oral fluconazole with oral polyenes for the prophylaxis of fungal colonization and infection in adults at high risk of developing neutropenia. Five hundred and thirty-six hospitalized patients with malignant disease, about to receive chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or bone marrow transplantation, and who were already neutropenic or were expected to develop neutropenia were included in the study. Before therapy or transplantation, patients commenced either oral fluconazole therapy (50 mg/day as a single dose) or oral polyenes therapy (amphotericin B 2 g/day and/or nystatin 4 x 10(6) units/day in four or more divided doses), for a mean of 29.3 days and 31.3 days, respectively. After baseline clinical and mycological testing, patients were re-evaluated at least weekly during prophylaxis, at the end of prophylaxis and two to six weeks later to identify proven or suspected fungal infection and to determine rates of colonization with fungi. Fungal infection was diagnosed in 41 of 511 evaluable patients, 10 (3.9%) of 256 in the fluconazole group and 31 (12.2%) of 255 in the polyene group (P = 0.001). This total included four patients (1.6%) in the fluconazole group who developed oropharyngeal candidiasis compared with 22 (8.6%) in the polyene group (P < 0.001). Systemic infections comprised 6 (2.3%) in the fluconazole group and 9 (3.5%) in the polyene group (P = not significant), and included three Candida krusei infections in each group. Parenteral amphotericin B therapy was given empirically for persistent fevers in an additional 62 (24.2%) patients receiving fluconazole and 59 (23.1%) receiving polyenes (P = not significant). Colonization with fungi was generally similar in each treatment group, although an increased proportion of patients receiving fluconazole developed colonization of the faeces (P < 0.01). Adverse reactions, possibly related to treatment, were recorded in 15 (5.6%) of 269 patients in the fluconazole group and 14 (5.2%) of 267 in the polyene group; these necessitated discontinuation of therapy in seven patients in each group. Once-a-day fluconazole was therefore more effective than oral polyenes for the prevention of oropharyngeal fungal infection and as effective for the prevention of infections at other sites in patients with neutropenia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.