Babesiosis is a disease with a world-wide distribution affecting many species of mammals principally cattle and man. The major impact occurs in the cattle industry where bovine babesiosis has had a huge economic effect due to loss of meat and beef production of infected animals and death. Nowadays to those costs there must be added the high cost of tick control, disease detection, prevention and treatment. In almost a century and a quarter since the first report of the disease, the truth is: there is no a safe and efficient vaccine available, there are limited chemotherapeutic choices and few low-cost, reliable and fast detection methods. Detection and treatment of babesiosis are important tools to control babesiosis. Microscopy detection methods are still the cheapest and fastest methods used to identify Babesia parasites although their sensitivity and specificity are limited. Newer immunological methods are being developed and they offer faster, more sensitive and more specific options to conventional methods, although the direct immunological diagnoses of parasite antigens in host tissues are still missing. Detection methods based on nucleic acid identification and their amplification are the most sensitive and reliable techniques available today; importantly, most of those methodologies were developed before the genomics and bioinformatics era, which leaves ample room for optimization. For years, babesiosis treatment has been based on the use of very few drugs like imidocarb or diminazene aceturate. Recently, several pharmacological compounds were developed and evaluated, offering new options to control the disease. With the complete sequence of the Babesia bovis genome and the B. bigemina genome project in progress, the post-genomic era brings a new light on the development of diagnosis methods and new chemotherapy targets. In this review, we will present the current advances in detection and treatment of babesiosis in cattle and other animals, with additional reference to several apicomplexan parasites.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of light microscopy (LM) examination of blood smears and a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (MPCR) assay, in terms of their ability to detect cattle experimentally infected with Babesia bovis, Babesia bigemina, and Anaplasma marginale. Blood samples were collected from 32 intact, 1-2 year old, Holstein bulls, previous to and after simultaneous inoculation of culture-derived or field isolates of B. bovis- and B. bigemina-infected erythrocytes. To establish the triple hemoparasite infection, 16 of the bulls were also inoculated with a calf-derived isolate of A. marginale. The results showed that both tests had 100% specificity. In contrast, the sensitivities of the MPCR assay against the LM test were 93.5% and 70.9%; 96.7% and 100%; and 93.8% and 93.8% for B. bovis, B. bigemina, and A. marginale infection, respectively. The advantages and disadvantages of the MPCR assay to differentially diagnose cattle with multiple hemoparasite infection are discussed.

The prevalence of helminth species in stray dogs, from the capital city of the state of Queretaro, was evaluated. A total of 378 dogs were captured and examined for the presence of helminths from January to December 2008. The results showed that 275 (72.8%) of examined dogs were infected with one or more helminth species. Single infections were observed in 139 (50.5%) of infected dogs and 136 (49.5%) harboured mixed infections. Out of the 378 dogs examined, 208 (55.2%) presented nematodes and 182 (48.1%) cestodes. The prevalences (confidence interval) and mean intensities of infection ( ± SD) of nematodes and cestodes encountered were:Ancylostoma caninum42.9% (37.9–47.8) and 22.1 ( ± 34.3);Toxocara canis15.1% (11.8–19.0) and 8.3 ( ± 15.0);Spirocerca lupi4.5% (2.7–7.1) and 3.9 ( ± 4.8);Toxascaris leonina2.3% (1.1–4.5) and 4.8 ( ± 3.5);Physaloptera praeputialis1.9% (0.8–3.8) and 9.7 ( ± 14.9);Dirofilaria immitis1.3% (0.4–3.1) and 5.6 ( ± 2.1);Oslerus osleri0.3% (0.0–1.6) and 5 ( ± 0.0);Dipylidium caninum44.9% (40.0–50.0) and 18.1 ( ± 27.7);Taeniaspp. 6.9% (4.7–9.9) and 6.9 ( ± 7.1). There were no significant differences in prevalences observed either between female (68.5%) and male (76.8%) or between young (70.6%) and adult (74.2%) animals. No differences were observed in the ANOVA test for the mean intensity of infection of any of the parasites (P>0.05).

The prevalence of fleas and gastrointestinal parasites in free-roaming and domestic cats in central Mexico was evaluated. Three hundred and fifty eight cats captured in the street or brought in by owners to the Animal Control Center Unit, a unit of State Government, from June 2010 to May 2011, were included in the study. All cats were examined for the presence of fleas and gastrointestinal worms. One-hundred and ninety (53%) cats were infested with at least one flea species. Single infestations were observed in 106 (30%) cats and mixed infestations in 84 (23%) cats. Four species of fleas were recovered: Ctenocephalides felis in 53% of the cats, C. canis in 18%, Echidnophaga gallinacea in 7% and Pulex irritans in 1%. One-hundred and sixty three (45%) cats were infected with one or more species of gastrointestinal parasites: 48 (13%) with nematodes, 145 (40%) with cestodes, and one animal presented Moniliformis moniliformis. Prevalences and mean intensity of infection were: Physaloptera praeputialis 7 and 18; T. cati 3 and 2; Ancylostoma tubaeforme 2.5 and 2; Toxascaris leonina 0.5 and 2; Dipylidium caninum 36 and 32; Taenia taeniformis 4 and 3 and Moniliformis moniliformis 0.3 and 106, respectively. There was significant association (P<0.01), between season and ectoparasites load, more fleas were obtained in the summer and autumn than in the winter and spring; however, no statistical difference was observed for endoparasites load (P>0.05). The correlation between the total number of ectoparasites and endoparasites was not significant (r = 0.089, P = 0.094).