No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of dietary energy, breed (British vs Continental x British crosses), and their interactions on scrotal surface temperature (SST), seminal quality, and sperm production in bulls. This experiment, replicated over 2 yr, included 72 Angus, Angus x Simmental, or Hereford x Simmental bulls fed either a moderate- (100% forage) or high-energy (80% grain, 20% forage) diet for 168 d after weaning. At the end of the feeding period, SST was determined by infrared thermography, seminal samples (two ejaculates) were collected by electroejaculation, and reproductive tracts were collected at slaughter. Bulls fed the high-energy diet were heavier (P < .0001; diet x time interaction), had thicker backfat (P < .05; diet x line x time interaction), and had a larger scrotal circumference (P < .05). Testicular tone decreased over time (P < .0001) with a diet x time interaction (P < .05). There was no significant effect of diet on top, bottom, or average SST. However, bulls fed the moderate-energy diet had a larger (P < .02) SST gradient (3.9 vs. 3.4 degrees C). Bulls fed the moderate-energy diet had more (P < .01) morphologically normal spermatozoa (68.8 +/- 2.1 vs 62.5 +/- 2.5%) and a higher proportion (P < .006) of progressively motile spermatozoa (53.4 +/- 2.1 vs 44.5 +/- 2.4%). No effects (P > .05) of dietary energy on epididymal sperm reserves or daily sperm production were detected. Increased dietary energy may affect scrotal or testicular thermoregulation by reducing the amount of heat that can be radiated from the scrotal neck, thereby increasing the temperature of the testes and scrotum.

The infrared temperature pattern (IRT) of the scrotal surface was recorded for 73 yearling beef bulls and a color video thermogram of the pattern of each bull was recorded. The average scortal surface temperature, temperature at the top and bottom of the scrotum, scortal temperature gradient, and thermal class (normal, questionable, or abnormal scortal surface thermal pattern) were recorded for each thermogram. Thirty-seven bulls had a normal temperature pattern (51%), 20 had a questionable pattern (27%), and 16 had an abnormal temperature pattern (22%). Bulls exhibiting abnormal scrotal temperature patterns had lower (P < .05) percentages of sperm exhibiting normal head and tail morphology and had a higher (P < .01) percentage of sperm with proximal droplets than did bulls with normal or questionable thermogram patterns. Thirty bulls with acceptable testis size and semen quality and representing the three thermal classes were each exposed single-sire to approximately 18 heifers during a 45-d pasture breeding period. Pregnancy rate was lower (P < .01) for bulls with abnormal scrotal temperature patterns (68 +/- 4%, n = 8) than for bulls with normal (83 +/- 4%, n = 13) and questionable temperature patterns (85 +/- 4%, n = 9), and pregnancy rate was related significantly to all four major characteristics (surface, top, and bottom temperatures and temperature gradient) of scortal thermograms. Data indicated that bulls with abnormal scortal temperature patterns exhibited a reduced ability to maintain an effective thermal gradient from top to bottom of the testes and that bulls with abnormal scrotal temperature patterns achieved reduced pregnancy rates when used for natural mating.

The right testis of 9 anaesthetized rams was removed from the parietal tunica vaginalis and replaced by a surrogate testis (water-filled balloon) through which water of known temperature was circulated. Thermistors were inserted in the surrogate testis, between the scrotal skin and parietal tunica vaginalis on the right side, and deep within the intact left testis. Scrotal surface temperatures over the surrogate and intact testes were measured by infrared thermography. Scrotal surface temperature was correlated (P less than 0.01) with both subcutaneous (r = 0.95) and surrogate (r = 0.91) testicular temperature. The temperature differential between scrotal surface (30.1 +/- 0.1 degrees C) and deep testicular temperature over the intact side (34.9 +/- 0.09 degrees C) was 4.8 degrees C at an ambient temperature between 24.0 and 26.6 degrees C. Contact with the scrotal skin is not required to measure scrotal surface temperature by infrared thermography. This, coupled with the close association between scrotal surface temperature and that of underlying structures, will enhance our ability to understand better testicular temperature regulation and scrotal/testicular function.