No abstract

Midazolam (M) is used as an induction agent for anesthesia. The main metabolite is alpha-hydroxymidazolam (OM), which is pharmacologically active. Use of M for sedation is a recent application, rapidly gaining favor. Monitoring of the level of sedation is fundamental in that an excessive and prolonged effect is associated with the risk of complications. Thus, it was felt both necessary and useful to measure circulating M levels. We compared a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay with fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) for the measurement of M in the serum of 138 sedated patients in the intensive care unit (i.e., 179 samples). Response of the OM was also assessed. The degree of crossover of the metabolite was between 76.8 and 32.7%. The equation of the regression line for sigma HPLC (i.e., the sum M + OM) versus FPIA was TDx = 1.1585 sigma HPLC + 143.42 (R = 0.966). The 95% confidence interval for the slope was 1.1551, 1.1619. The regression slope differed significantly from 1 (p < 0.001) and shows that FPIA measurements overestimated concentrations obtained by HPLC on the order of 19%. The discrepancy between the two techniques was all the more notable when concentrations were > 1,000 ng/ml. The relative selectivity of Abbott industrial reagent in terms of benzodiazepines leads to the identification of what might be called a midazolam-like (M-like) activity covering both M and OM. The development of a global FPIA method for measurement of this M-like activity in sedated patients provides a satisfactory solution to the question raised.

No abstract

The study's purpose was to estimate the potential economic benefit of the optimization of postanesthesia care units (PACUs). A simulation model was designed and used to test the economic impact of a reduction of length of stay. For the studied PACU, a reduction of 25% of length of stay is required to yield significant economic results.

Compared with bupivacaine (150 mg), a larger dose of ropivacaine (225 mg) produces comparable features of cervical plexus block but less postoperative analgesia and larger plasma concentrations. There is no reason to favor ropivacaine in such a case.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract