In patients with chronic hepatitis B infection, the clearance of HBeAg after treatment with interferon alfa is associated with improved clinical outcomes.
Despite reliable results of ankle fusion for advanced haemophilic arthropathy, total ankle replacement (TAR) may be functionally advantageous. There is only very limited literature data available on TAR in patients with haemophilia. The objective of this study is to evaluate the short- and mid-term results after TAR in patients with end-stage haemophilic ankle arthropathy and concomitant virus infections. In a retrospective study, results after eleven TAR in 10 patients with severe (n = 8) and moderate (n = 2) haemophilia (mean age: 49 ± 7 years, range, 37-59) were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 3.0 years (range, 1.2-5.4). Nine patients were positive for hepatitis C, five were HIV-positive. Range of motion (ROM), AOFAS-hindfoot-score, pain status (visual analogue scale, VAS) as well as patient satisfaction were evaluated. In two cases deep prosthesis infection occurred leading to the removal of the implant. In the remaining eight patients the mean AOFAS score improved significantly from 21.5 to 68.0 points (P < 0.0005), the VAS score decreased significantly from 7.6 to 1.9 points (P < 0.0005). ROM increased from 23.2 to 25.0 degrees (P = 0.51). At final follow-up all patients without any complications were satisfied with the postoperative results. Radiographic examination did not reveal any signs of prosthetic loosening. TAR is a viable surgical treatment option in patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis due to haemophilia. It provides significant pain relieve and high patient satisfaction. However, due to the increased risk of infection and lack of long-term results, TAR particularly in patients with severe haemophilia and virus infections should be indicated carefully.
Total knee arthroplasty in haemophilic patients presenting with stiff knees results in significant improvement of function and reduction in pain. Although the clinical outcome is inferior compared to nonstiff knees reported in the literature, joint replacement surgery can be successfully performed in this particular group of patients.
Summary. Acquired haemophilia (AH), an autoimmune disorder with clinical features ranging from harmless haematomas to life‐threatening bleedings, still has a mortality rate of up to 25%. Owing to its low frequency (1–4 × 106), standardized treatment protocols for its variable manifestations are not available. In case of prominent severe bleedings, the treatment should aim at rapid elimination of the antibody to protect patients from bleedings and on reinduction of long‐term immune tolerance. Clinical data, short‐ and long‐term treatment results of 67 patients diagnosed by our centre are presented. Patients were treated depending on their bleeding severity either by an immunosuppressive treatment alone, or in case of life‐threatening bleedings, by a combined protocol (modified Bonn–Malmö protocol, MBMP) consisting of antibody depletion through immunoadsorption, intravenous immunoglobulin treatment, immunosuppression and high‐dose factor VIII (FVIII) substitution. Mild bleedings occurred in two patients who were treated successfully alone by immunosuppression. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 90% of the patients treated with MBMP (60). Of the six patients (10%) who achieved a partial remission (PR), four suffered from cancer. Mortality under MBMP was not seen. In contrast, five patients, in whom diagnosis of AH was delayed, experienced fatal outcome during surgical interventions before initiation of MBMP treatment. Prognosis in AH depends mainly on its prompt diagnosis. Treatment procedures should be adapted to bleeding severity and inhibitor titres. Under these conditions, AH is a potentially curable autoimmune disorder with an excellent prognosis.
The outcome and clinical features of 7 HIV-positive patients who were liver transplanted at Bonn University in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) between 1997 and 2004, analyzed by retrospective chart review, are reported. Reasons for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) were end-stage liver disease due to chronic hepatitis C (n ؍ 4) or hepatitis B (n ؍ 1) or acute liver failure due to fulminant hepatitis B (n ؍ 2). Immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine A and prednisone. HAART was reinitiated 1 month after transplantation, and immunosuppression was carefully adapted to account for drug-drug interactions between cyclosporine A and protease inihibitors. Prednisone was withdrawn 5 months (median) after OLT when immunosuppression had been reliably established in the presence of HAART. One patient died 95 days after OLT due intrathoracic hemorrhage, whereas 6 patients were alive at a median of 24 months. A single episode of acute rejection was observed. The spectrum of postoperative complications was no different from HIV-negative patients apart from Kaposi's sarcoma and multicentric Castleman's disease in a single patient. Recurrent hepatitis B infection was efficiently prevented, whereas hepatitis C reinfection occurred in all 4 patients who had preexisting hepatitis C. Earlier reports on fatal courses of recurrent hepatitis C infection, high rates of organ rejection, and HAART-related liver toxicity were not observed in our patients. In conclusion, even though preliminary, our data suggest that outcomes after liver transplantation of HIV-infected patients can be improved. (Liver Transpl 2005;11: 1515-1521.)
Urological interventions in hemophiliac patients with factor supply have the same risk for postoperative complications as in non-hemophiliacs. The only significant difference between hemophiliacs and non-hemophiliacs was the length of hospital stay.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.