Introduction: State of emergency caused by COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdown hit Spain on 14th March 2020 and lasted until 21st June 2020. Social isolation measures were applied. Medical attention was focused on COVID-19. Primary and social care were mainly performed by telephone. This exceptional situation may affect especially vulnerable patients such as people living with dementia. Our aim was to describe the influence of restrictive measures on patients living with mild cognitive decline and dementia evaluating SARS-CoV2 infection, changes in routines, cognitive decline stage, neuropsychiatric symptoms, delirium, falls, caregiver stress, and access to sanitary care.Materials and Methods: We gathered MCI and dementia patients with clinical follow-up before and after confinement from DegMar registry (Hospital del Mar). A telephone ad-hoc questionnaire was administered. Global status was assessed using CDR scale. Changes in neuropsychiatric symptoms were assessed by Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and retrospective interview for pre-confinement base characteristics.Results: We contacted a total of 60 patients, age 75.4 years ± 5,192. 53.3% were women. Alzheimer's Disease (41.7%) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (25%) were the most prevalent diagnosis. Remaining cases included different dementia disorders. A total of 10% of patients had been diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2. During confinement 70% of patients abandoned previous daily activities, 60% had cognitive worsening reported by relatives/caretakers, 15% presented delirium episodes, and 13% suffered increased incidence of falls. Caregivers reported an increased burden in 41% cases and burnout in 11% cases. 16% reported difficulties accessing medical care, 33% received medical phone assistance, 20% needed emergency care and 21% had changes in psychopharmacological therapies. Neuropsychiatric profile globally worsened (p < 0.000), also in particular items like agitation (p = 0.003), depression (p < 0.000), anxiety (p < 0.000) and changes in appetite (p = 0.004).Conclusion: SARS-CoV2-related lockdown resulted in an important effect over social and cognitive spheres and worsening of neuropsychiatric traits in patients living with mild cognitive decline and dementia. Although the uncertainty regarding the evolution of the pandemic makes strategy difficult, we need to reach patients and caregivers and develop adequate strategies to reinforce and adapt social and health care.

Introduction: Direct comparisons of the main blood phosphorylated tau immunoassays in memory clinic populations are needed to understand possible differences. Methods:In the BIODEGMAR study, 197 participants presenting with cognitive complaints were classified into an Alzheimer's disease (AD) or a non-AD cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) profile group, according to their amyloid beta 42/ phosphorylated tau (Aβ42/p-tau) ratio. We performed a head-to-head comparison of nine plasma and nine CSF tau immunoassays and determined their accuracy to discriminate abnormal CSF Aβ42/p-tau ratio.Results: All studied plasma tau biomarkers were significantly higher in the AD CSF profile group compared to the non-AD CSF profile group and significantly discriminated abnormal CSF Aβ42/p-tau ratio. For plasma p-tau biomarkers, the higher discrimination accuracy was shown by Janssen p-tau217 (r = 0.76; area under the curve[AUC] = 0.96), ADx p-tau181 (r = 0.73; AUC = 0.94), and Lilly p-tau217 (r = 0.73; AUC = 0.94).Discussion: Several plasma p-tau biomarkers can be used in a specialized memory clinic as a stand-alone biomarker to detect biologically-defined AD.

No abstract

INTRODUCTIONAmyloid‐β (Aβ) and tau can be quantified in blood. However, biological factors can influence the levels of brain‐derived proteins in the blood. The blood‐brain barrier (BBB) regulates protein transport between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood. BBB altered permeability might affect the relationship between brain and blood biomarkers.METHODSWe assessed 224 participants in research (TRIAD, n = 96) and clinical (BIODEGMAR, n = 128) cohorts with plasma and CSF/positron emission tomography Aβ, p‐tau, and albumin measures.RESULTSPlasma Aβ42/40 better identified CSF Aβ42/40 and Aβ‐PET positivity in individuals with high BBB permeability. An interaction between plasma Aβ42/40 and BBB permeability on CSF Aβ42/40 was observed. Voxel‐wise models estimated that the association of positron emission tomography (PET), with plasma Aβ was most affected by BBB permeability in AD‐related brain regions. BBB permeability did not significantly impact the relationship between brain and plasma p‐tau levels.DISCUSSIONThese findings suggest that BBB integrity may influence the performance of plasma Aβ, but not p‐tau, biomarkers in research and clinical settings.Highlights BBB permeability affects the association between brain and plasma Aβ levels. BBB integrity does not affect the association between brain and plasma p‐tau levels. Plasma Aβ was most affected by BBB permeability in AD‐related brain regions. BBB permeability increases with age but not according to cognitive status.

BackgroundSeveral blood phosphorylated tau (P‐tau) species (P‐tau181, P‐tau217, and P‐tau231) have shown high accuracy to detect AD pathology, but a direct comparison of the main blood P‐tau assays in a real‐world memory clinic is needed. The main aim of this study is to perform a head‐to‐head comparison of 9 plasma Tau assays and determine their accuracy to discriminate between symptomatic AD from non‐AD.MethodThis is an observational and cross‐sectional study in the BIODEGMAR cohort, which includes patients presenting with cognitive complaints at the Cognitive Decline and Movement Disorders Unit of Hospital del Mar (Barcelona, Spain). Patients were classified into an AD CSF profile group or a non‐AD CSF profile group according to their CSF Aβ42/P‐tau181 ratio (Lumipulse, Fujirebio), and the discrimination accuracy of 9 plasma Tau assays was tested. All plasma samples were treated identically and measurements were performed in a blinded fashion.ResultA total of 197 participants (109 women [55.3%]; mean [SD] age, 72.3 [5.83] years), were investigated. All plasma Tau biomarkers were significantly higher in the AD CSF profile group than in the non‐AD CSF profile group. For plasma Tau biomarkers, the largest effect sizes were found in plasma Janssen P‐tau217 (r = 0.76), Lilly P‐tau217 (r = 0.73), ADx P‐tau181 (r = 0.73), Lilly P‐tau181 (r = 0.68), and UGot P‐tau231 (r = 0.63). All plasma Tau biomarkers significantly discriminated between patients with an AD CSF profile group from those with a non‐AD CSF profile. The AUC of plasma Tau biomarkers were the following (from highest to lower): Janssen P‐tau217 (0.96; 95% CI, 0.93‐0.99), ADx P‐tau181 (0.94; 95% CI, 0.91‐0.97) and Lilly P‐tau217 (0.94; 95% CI, 0.90‐0.98), Lilly P‐tau181 (0.91; 95% CI, 0.87‐0.96), UGot P‐tau231 (0.88; 95% CI, 0.83‐0.93), Quanterix P‐tau181 (0.80; 95% CI, 0.73‐0.87), UGot P‐tau181 (0.80; 95% CI, 0.73‐0.87), Lilly Total‐tau (0.73; 95% CI, 0.65‐0.81), and ADx P‐tau231 (0.66; 95% CI, 0.58‐0.74).ConclusionThe findings indicate that there are several plasma P‐tau biomarkers that can be used in a memory clinic setting as a stand‐alone biomarker to detect AD pathology in a diverse group of patients presenting with cognitive complaints.

Background Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) p-tau235 is a novel biomarker highly specific of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, CSF p-tau235 has only been studied in well-characterized research cohorts, which do not fully reflect the patient landscape found in clinical settings. Therefore, in this multicentre study, we investigated the performance of CSF p-tau235 to detect symptomatic AD in clinical settings and compared it with CSF p-tau181, p-tau217 and p-tau231. Methods CSF p-tau235 was measured using an in-house single molecule array (Simoa) assay in two independent memory clinic cohorts: Paris cohort (Lariboisière Fernand-Widal University Hospital Paris, France; n=212) and BIODEGMAR cohort (Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; n=175). Patients were classified by the syndromic diagnosis (cognitively unimpaired [CU], mild cognitive impairment [MCI] or dementia) and their biological diagnosis (amyloid-beta [Aβ]+ or Aβ $$-$$ - ). Both cohorts included detailed cognitive assessments and CSF biomarker measurements (clinically validated core AD biomarkers [Lumipulse CSF Aβ1–42/40 ratio, p-tau181 and t-tau] and in-house developed Simoa CSF p-tau181, p-tau217 and p-tau231). Results High CSF p-tau235 levels were strongly associated with CSF amyloidosis regardless of the clinical diagnosis, being significantly increased in MCI Aβ+ and dementia Aβ+ when compared with all other Aβ− groups (Paris cohort: P ˂0.0001 for all; BIODEGMAR cohort: P ˂0.05 for all). CSF p-tau235 was pronouncedly increased in the A+T+ profile group compared with A−T− and A+T− groups (P ˂0.0001 for all). Moreover, CSF p-tau235 demonstrated high diagnostic accuracies identifying CSF amyloidosis in symptomatic cases (AUCs=0.86 to 0.96) and discriminating AT groups (AUCs=0.79 to 0.98). Overall, CSF p-tau235 showed similar performances to CSF p-tau181 and CSF p-tau231 when discriminating CSF amyloidosis in various scenarios, but lower than CSF p-tau217. Finally, CSF p-tau235 associated with global cognition and memory domain in both cohorts. Conclusions CSF p-tau235 was increased with the presence of CSF amyloidosis in two independent memory clinic cohorts. CSF p-tau235 accurately identified AD in both MCI and dementia patients. Overall, the diagnostic performance of CSF p-tau235 was comparable to that of other CSF p-tau measurements, indicating its suitability to support a biomarker-based AD diagnosis in clinical settings.

Objective The HIV infection is a chronic disease that causes neurocognitive impairment (NI) and has been related with early development of frailty. We aimed to study the main risk factors for neurocognitive disorders and frailty in HIV older adults. Materials and methods Cross-sectional study with 40 HIV individuals older than 65 years under antiretroviral therapy in Hospital del Mar (Barcelona) recruited between November 2019 and October 2020. Data has been obtained through clinical scores and a blood sample to evaluate NI and frailty and has been analyzed with non-parametric tests and a multivariate logistic regression model. Results Among the 40 patients admitted for the study, 14 (35%) had positive screening for NI. We found that HIV individuals with nadir CD4+ T-cell count lower than 350 cells/mm3 had 39.7 more risk for NI (95% CI 2.49–632.10; p = 0.009). Those with a lower education level had 22.78 more risk for neurocognitive disorders (95% CI 2.13–242.71; p = 0.01) and suffering any comorbidity with a punctuation ≥ 1 in the Charlson Comorbidity index had an increased risk of 18.26 of developing NI and frailty (95% CI 1.30–256.33; p = 0.031), among them diabetes was significantly more frequent in NI. Conclusion We observed that the main risk factors for a positive NI screening in HIV older adults were low education level, a nadir CD4+ T-cell count < 350 cells/mm3 and the presence of any comorbidity, highlighting diabetes among them.

No abstract