BackgroundMucormycosis is a highly lethal fungal infection especially in immunocompromised individuals.MethodsIn order to review the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of mucormycosis in renal transplant recipients we searched publications of mucormycosis cases in renal transplant recipients in PUBMED database up to December 2015.ResultsA total of 174 cases in renal transplant recipients were included in this review. Most of the cases (76%) were male. Major underlying diseases were diabetes mellitus (43.1%). Rhinocerebral was the most common site of infection (33.3%). Rhizopus species was the most frequent fungus (59.1%) in patients with pathogen identified to species level. The mortality rates of disseminated mucormycosis (76.0%) and graft renal (55.6%) were higher than infection in other sites. The overall survival in patients received surgical debridement combined with amphotericin B/posaconazole (70.2%) was higher than those who received antifungal therapy alone (32.4%), surgery alone (36.4%) or without therapy (0%) (p < 0.001). The overall survivals in patients receiving posaconazole and lipid amphoterincin B were higher than that receiving deoxycholate formulation (92.3% and 73.4% vs 47.4%).ConclusionsMucormycosis is a severe infection in renal transplant recipients. Surgical debridement combined with antifungals, especially liposomal amphotericin B and posaconazole, can significantly improve patient’s overall survival.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-017-2381-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Because of the great problem of viral hepatitis in hemodialysis patients, the Italian Society of Nephrology decided to perform a national epidemiologic survey. We contacted 467 nephrological centers by a questionnaire which let us have information on 25,746 uremic patients: 18,338 on HD, 2,250 on PD and 5,176 with kidney transplant, respectively 78.5% of the total Italian dialysed patients and 91.4% of the total transplanted patients. Statistical analyses were performed. HBV infections occur in 7.8% of the patients (2,008 cases) but considering that 485 cases became spontaneously negative, the true overall incidence of chronic carriers falls to 4.9%. The main causes of the infection are reported as transfusions (64.3%) and dialysis environment (12%). The vaccination program performed by 93.2% of the centers, obtained an efficacious seroconversion in 4,626 of 7,790 cases vaccinated: the vaccine currently most utilized is the recombinant type administered by means of 3 versus 4 boosters. In the 2nd part of the survey, we report information concerning the presence of nephropaties associated with HBV infections in nonuremic patients (208 cases). We present and discuss the clinical picture of the nephropaties, the hystologic bioptic pattern and the prognosis of the kidney pathology.

No abstract

No abstract

This study was performed in 97 hemodialysis patients (85 on HD and 12 on CAPD) to investigate the possible correlation between B2-m and hemodialysis-related amyloidosis syndromes (HRA-S); differences in B2-m and HRA behavior between patients hemodialysed with cellulose and synthetic membranes were also included in the present study. Data indicate that B2-m levels are not correlated with dialysis length or with the type of membrane used for the dialysis. On the contrary, in 16 patients with the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, a significant correlation was found between the CTS, the dialysis length and the type of membrane (greater incidence with cellulosic membranes).

Basic indications for the use of apheresis in the treatment of antibody-mediated acute rejection include: (i) resistance to conventional anti-rejection therapy; (ii) poor prognosis for the graft; (iii) the need for a rapid removal of antibodies from the circulation, since their half-life is of about 3 weeks. Despite the large number of cases already reported in the literature, the role of apheresis in the treatment of acute rejection is still a matter of discussion. This is due to the difficulties in drawing definitive conclusions on its effectiveness for the lack of large controlled trials as well as for the variability in treatment schedules and the associated drug therapy. However, in many transplant centers apheresis is currently used to treat antibody-mediated acute rejection. The criteria for an appropriate use of apheresis in these settings are: (i) a prompt diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection by means of graft biopsy; (ii) starting apheresis as soon as possible after diagnosis, and before irreversible damage of the graft occurs, without waiting for failure of drug therapy; (iii) the association with immunosuppressive agents effective on antibody production.

No abstract

No abstract