Key Points• High-dose intensive factor VIII treatment increases the risk for inhibitor development in patients with severe hemophilia A.• In patients with severe hemophilia A, factor VIII prophylaxis decreases inhibitor risk, especially in patients with low-risk F8 mutations.The objective of this study was to examine the association of the intensity of treatment, ranging from high-dose intensive factor VIII (FVIII) treatment to prophylactic treatment, with the inhibitor incidence among previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A. This cohort study aimed to include consecutive patients with a FVIII activity < 0.01 IU/mL, born between 2000 and 2010, and observed during their first 75 FVIII exposure days. Intensive FVIII treatment of hemorrhages or surgery at the start of treatment was associated with an increased inhibitor risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-3.0). High-dose FVIII treatment was associated with a higher inhibitor risk than low-dose FVIII treatment (aHR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.0-4.8). Prophylaxis was only associated with a decreased overall inhibitor incidence after 20 exposure days of FVIII. The association with prophylaxis was more pronounced in patients with low-risk F8 genotypes than in patients with high-risk F8 genotypes (aHR, 0.61, 95% CI, 0.85, 95% CI, respectively). In conclusion, our findings suggest that in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A, high-dosed intensive FVIII treatment increases inhibitor risk and prophylactic FVIII treatment decreases inhibitor risk, especially in patients with low-risk F8 mutations. (Blood. 2013;121(20):4046-4055)

It has been suggested that plasma-derived factor VIII products induce fewer inhibitors than recombinant factor VIII products. We investigated the relationship of factor VIII product type and switching between factor VIII products with the risk to develop inhibitors. This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 316 patients with severe hemophilia A born between 1990 and 2000. The outcome was clinically relevant inhibitor development, defined as the occurrence of at least 2 positive inhibitor titers with decreased recovery. The risk of inhibitor development was not clearly lower in plasma-derived compared with recombinant factor VIII products (relative risk [RR], 0.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-1.3). Among high-titer inhibitors, the possible reduction in risk was even less pronounced (RR, 0.9; CI, 0.5-1.5). Plasma-derived products with considerable quantities of von Willebrand factor (VWF) carried the same risk for inhibitor development as recombinant factor VIII products (RR, 1.0; CI, 0.6-1.6). Switching between factor VIII products did not increase the risk for inhibitors (RR, 1.1; CI, 0.6-1.8). In conclusion, our findings support neither the notion that plasmaderived factor VIII products with considerable concentrations of VWF confer a lower risk to develop inhibitory antibodies than recombinant factor VIII products, nor that switching between factor VIII product brands increases inhibitor risks in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A. IntroductionAt present, the main concern in the treatment of children with severe hemophilia A is the development of inhibitory antibodies that neutralize infused factor VIII, occurring in 10% to 30% of patients. 1 Several patient-related factors have been associated with the risk of developing inhibitors, such as factor VIII gene mutation, 2-4 other genetic factors, 5-8 family history of inhibitors, 9-11 and ethnicity. 11,12 In addition to these determinants, a number of treatment-related factors have been suggested to affect the risk of inhibitor development, such as prophylaxis, 13,14 age at first exposure, 15,16 and intensity of treatment. 17 One of the most intensively discussed potential risk factors is the factor VIII product type.Indications for a potential role of the factor VIII product type in inhibitor development arose when prospective registration studies of recombinant factor VIII products among previously untreated hemophilia A patients reported inhibitor incidences between 29% and 32%. [18][19][20][21][22][23] These incidences were considerably higher than the previously observed 0% to 12% in patients treated with single plasma-derived products. 1,24 However, methodologic differences between studies rendered comparisons inconclusive. 25 More convincing were the findings of a recent comparative study in which the inhibitor risk in patients treated with full-length recombinant factor VIII was again higher than the risk in patients treated with a high-purity plasma-derived factor VIII product containing von Willebrand factor (VWF)...

Summary. The most problematic complication of haemophilia A treatment is the development of inhibitors to FVIII. The highest risk of developing inhibitors is during the first 20 exposure days (EDs). If the patient can be brought through this high risk period without inhibitor development, the subsequent risk is low. Therefore, as a pilot project, we developed a prophylaxis regimen for the first 20-50 EDs specifically designed to induce tolerance to the administered FVIII and to minimize inhibitor development by avoiding immunological danger signals. Twenty-six consecutive previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe haemophilia A were treated with the new prophylaxis regimen and the incidence of inhibitor development in this group was compared with that in a historical control group of 30 consecutive PUPs treated with a standard joint protection prophylaxis regimen (40-50 IU kg )1 , three times a week). There were no significant differences between the study and control groups in patient-related inhibitor risk factors such as ethnicity (all Caucasian), severity of haemophilia (all <1% FVIII), severity of FVIII gene mutation (P < 0.0006) nor in some treatment-related factors such as product type, age at first exposure, vaccination regimen or the need for surgery. 14 of 30 subjects given standard prophylaxis but only one of the 26 subjects given the new regimen developed an inhibitor (P = 0.0003, odds ratio 0.048, 95% CI: 0.001-0.372). Our results indicate that minimizing danger signals during the first 20 EDs with FVIII may reduce the risk of inhibitor formation. These results should be confirmed in a larger prospective clinical study.

Inherited factor X deficiency (FXD) is a rare (1:1,000,000) recessive bleeding disorder. The clinical and laboratory phenotypes of FXD are poorly correlated and few regional studies on the genotype and the clinical manifestations of FXD are known. To understand the association between clinical manifestations and causative genotype, detailed evaluation of bleeding pattern in a high number of patients is needed. This international study analysed the phenotype and genotype of 102 subjects from Central Europe (Germany, Poland and Slovakia) and Latin America (Costa Rica and Venezuela) with causative mutations in the F10 gene, via sequencing. Twenty-eight homozygous, seven compound-heterozygous and 67 heterozygous FXD subjects were characterized. Twenty-nine different causative mutations, including 15 novel mutations, were analysed. Spontaneous bleeding symptoms in 42 symptomatic individuals (26 homozygous, seven compound heterozygous and nine heterozygous) comprised easy bruising (55%), haematoma (43%), epistaxis (36%), haemarthrosis (33%), intracranial haemorrhage (ICH; 21%), and gastrointestinal (GI) haemorrhage (12%). The manifestation of bleeding symptoms in 9 of 67 (13%) symptomatic heterozygous subjects is described. The bleeding patterns of the enrolled patients showed differences that are associated with the types of F10 mutation, and the corresponding genotypes. The homozygous patients were evaluated for genotype-phenotype correlation. The results suggested that ICH seems to be associated with the F10 mutation Gly380Arg, and possibly with the mutations IVS7-1G>A and Tyr163delAT. A tentative association of other mutations to severe symptoms such as haemarthrosis and GI haemorrhage is reported. The severity of FXD, the genotype-phenotype association, and the results of regional studies are discussed.

The frequency and outcome of ICH in haemophiliacs have not changed in our cohort over the past 20 years. Trauma at birth is an important risk factor for ICH in patients with haemophilia A or B. Intracranial haemorrhages in older children are rare, and a better outcome may be expected.

To establish the pharmacokinetic profile of activated recombinant coagulation factor VII (rFVIIa; NovoSeven in children with haemophilia A, and to compare it with the pharmacokinetic profile in adults with haemophilia A. Twelve children (2-12 years) received one single dose of rFVIIa 90 and 180 micrograms kg(-1) in randomized order separated by a washout period of 48 h to 1 month. Six adults (18-55 years) received a single dose of rFVIIa 90 micrograms kg(-1). The pharmacokinetic analyses were based on a non-compartmental method. In children, the plasma level of FVII increased proportionally with the dose. The total body clearance normalized for body weight was significantly faster in children than in adults (FVII:C, 58 vs. 39 mL kg(-1) h(-1) and FVIIa, 78 vs. 53 mL kg(-1) h(-1), P < 0.05). A trend towards a larger volume of distribution at steady-state in children than in adults was observed (P > 0.05). Dose proportionality was established for plasma concentrations of FVII in children with haemophilia A at the dose levels investigated (90 and 180 micrograms kg(-1) rFVIIa). Following administration of rFVIIa 90 micrograms kg(-1), significantly faster clearance was observed in children compared with adults, suggesting that higher doses of rFVIIa may be needed to achieve the same plasma levels as in adults.

Because of the very short half-life of factor VII, prophylaxis in factor VII deficiency is considered a difficult endeavor. The clinical efficacy and safety of prophylactic regimens, and indications for their use, were evaluated in factor VII-deficient patients in the Seven Treatment Evaluation Registry. Prophylaxis data (38 courses) were analyzed from 34 patients with severe factor VII deficiency (<1-45 years of age, 21 female). Severest phenotypes (central nervous system, gastrointestinal, joint bleeding episodes) were highly prevalent. Twenty-one patients received recombinant activated factor VII (24 courses), four received plasma-derived factor VII, and ten received freshfrozen plasma. Prophylactic schedules clustered into "frequent" courses (three times weekly, n=23) and "infrequent" courses (≤2 times weekly, n=15). Excluding courses for menorrhagia, "frequent" and "infrequent" courses produced 18/23 (78%) and 5/12 (41%) "excellent" outcomes, respectively; relative risk, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-3.79; P=0.079. Long-term prophylaxis lasted from 1 to >10 years. No thrombosis or new inhibitors occurred. In conclusion, a subset of patients with factor VII deficiency needed prophylaxis because of severe bleeding. Recombinant activated factor VII schedules based on "frequent" administrations (three times weekly) and a 90 mg/kg total weekly dose were effective. These data provide a rationale for long-term, safe prophylaxis in factor VII deficiency (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01269138). Prophylaxis in congenital factor VII deficiency: indications, efficacy and safety. Results from the Seven Treatment Evaluation Registry (STER)

The standard therapy for patients with haemophilia is prophylactic treatment with replacement factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX). Patients who develop inhibitors against FVIII/FIX face an increased risk of bleeding, and the likelihood of early development of progressive arthropathy, alongside higher treatment‐related costs. Bypassing agents can be used to prevent and control bleeding, as well as the recently licensed prophylaxis, emicizumab, but their efficacy is less predictable than that of factor replacement therapy. Antibody eradication, by way of immune tolerance induction (ITI), is still the preferred management strategy for treating patients with inhibitors. This approach is successful in most patients, but some are difficult to tolerise and/or are unresponsive to ITI, and they represent the most complicated patients to treat. However, there are limited clinical data and guidelines available to help guide physicians in formulating the next treatment steps in these patients. This review summarises currently available treatment options for patients with inhibitors, focussing on ITI regimens and those ITI strategies that may be used in difficult‐to‐treat patients. Some alternative, non‐ITI approaches for inhibitor management, are also proposed.