Background. Cancer is most common in older age groups, but little information is available with regard to the impact of age on chemotherapy toxicity. This study was undertaken to determine if age is an independent risk factor for 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) toxicity.
Methods. Toxicity data from a prospective, randomized, multiinstitution trial of 5‐FU‐based treatment for advanced colorectal cancer were analyzed. Toxicity for each organ system was graded. Individual organ toxicity proportions were compared using chi‐square analysis. A logistic regression was performed using age (younger than 70 years vs. 70 years or older), sex, treatment arm, performance status, and length of therapy as model parameters to predict severe toxicity. Toxicity in 331 patients was analyzed.
Results. Advanced age was significantly associated with the occurrence of any severe toxicity (58 vs. 36%, P < 0.001), leukopenia (24 vs. 10%, P < 0.005), diarrhea (24 vs. 14%, P = 0.01), vomiting (15 vs. 5%, P = 0.01), severe toxicity in more than 2 organ systems (10 vs. 3%, P = 0.02), and treatment mortality (9 vs. 2%, P = 0.01). By univariate analysis, age (P < 0.001) and sex (P < 0.0001) were independent predictors of severe toxicity. Twenty‐two of 27 women age 70 years or older had severe toxicity.
Conclusions. Age 70 years or older and sex are risk factors for severe toxicity from 5‐FU‐based chemotherapy. Advanced age does not contraindicate the use of this type of chemotherapy, but close monitoring for multiple organ toxicities and vigorous supportive care of those with toxicity are required. Dosing decisions in older patients are difficult and must integrate assessments of organ function, comorbidities, overall physical status, and goals of treatment, in an effort to ensure the best possible outcome for these patients.
Twenty-five patients affected with unresectable hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) were treated with 370 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus 200 mg/m2 racemic leucovorin both for 5 consecutive days. The chemotherapy cycle was repeated every 4 weeks until disease progression. One complete remission (4%) and 6 partial responses (24%) were obtained, that is 7 objective responses in all (28%, ninety-five confidence interval: 10.1–45.9%). All responders had a good PS and only 1 of them presented with bulky disease. Five patients (20%) exhibited stable disease, while the remaining 13 patients (52%) progressed. Toxicity was mild: 11 patients (44%) had grade II/III mucositis, 10 patients (40%) grade II diarrhea, 7 patients (28%) grade II nausea, 2 patients grade III granulocytopenia and 1 patient only (4%) grade I skin toxicity. This regimen made it possible to obtain a high rate of objective responses even in inoperable HCCs which are commonly considered as chemoresistant lesions.
Abbreviations & AcronymsAbstract: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension is a variety of intracranial hypertension that is extremely rare in men. Obesity and hypogonadism are the most important predictive factors. Etiological hypotheses include increased central venous pressure, and various hormonal and metabolic changes commonly found in obese patients. We described the case of an obese man with prostate cancer who showed a consistent bodyweight increase during treatment with taxanes and prednisone. He was hospitalized because of a severe loss of vision as a consequence of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. A complete symptom remission was obtained after 3 weeks of anti-edema therapies (steroids, acetazolamide). Castration-resistant prostate cancer is a risk factor for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Long-term androgen deprivation therapy, bodyweight increase, and fluid retention during chronic steroid administration and taxane chemotherapy might favor the disease onset. This severe complication has a good outcome, and should be suspected in the presence of symptoms and signs of intracranial hypertension.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.