Ocular gene therapy has evolved rapidly into the clinical realm due to promising pre-clinical proof-of-concept studies, recognition of the high unmet medical need of blinding disorders, and the excellent safety profile of the most commonly used vector system, the adeno-associated virus (AAV). With several trials exposing subjects to AAV, investigators independently report about cases with clinically evident inflammation in treated eyes despite the concept of ocular immune privilege. Here, we provide a detailed analysis of innate and adaptive immune response to clinical-grade AAV8 in non-human primates and compare this to preliminary clinical data from a retinal gene therapy trial for CNGA3-based achromatopsia (ClinicalTrials.gov: 02610582).
Achromatopsia linked to variations in the CNGA3 gene is associated with day blindness, poor visual acuity, photophobia, and involuntary eye movements owing to lack of cone photoreceptor function. No treatment is currently available. OBJECTIVE To assess safety and vision outcomes of supplemental gene therapy with adeno-associated virus (AAV) encoding CNGA3 (AAV8.CNGA3) in patients with CNGA3-linked achromatopsia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This open-label, exploratory nonrandomized controlled trial tested safety and vision outcomes of gene therapy vector AAV8.CNGA3 administered by subretinal injection at a single center. Nine patients (3 per dose group) with a clinical diagnosis of achromatopsia and confirmed biallelic disease-linked variants in CNGA3 were
An exceptionally high number of monogenic disorders lead to incurable blindness, making them targets for the development of gene-therapy. In order to successfully apply therapeutic vector systems in vivo, the heterogeneity of the disease phenotype needs to be considered. This necessitates tailored approaches such as subretinal or intravitreal injections with the aim to maximize transduction of target cell populations, while minimizing off-target effects and surgical complications. Strategic decisions on parameters of the application are crucial to obtain the best treatment outcomes and patient safety. While most of the current retinal gene therapy trials utilize a subretinal approach, a deeper understanding of the numerous factors and considerations in choosing one delivery approach over the other for various ocular pathologies could lead to an improved safety and treatment efficacy. In this review we survey different vector injection techniques and parameters applied in recent retinal (pre-)clinical trials. We explore the advantages and shortcomings of each delivery strategy in the setting of different underlying ocular pathologies and other relevant factors. We highlight the potential benefits for patient safety and efficacy in applying those considerations in the decision making process.
These data illustrate that subretinal application of rAAV8 leads to a more favorable biodistribution profile compared to intravitreal injections. Extraocular biodistribution is limited after subretinal delivery, while intravitreal injection leads to both greater and more persistent systemic exposure, evident in blood and lymphatic tissues. With the knowledge on the dynamics of shedding in a setting mimicking clinical application, guidelines can be developed to refine clinical trial protocols to reduce the risk for trial subjects and their environment.
IMPORTANCE Choroideremia (CHM) is a rare, degenerative, genetic retinal disorder resulting from mutation of the CHM gene, leading to an absence of functional ras-associated binding escort protein 1 (REP1). There is currently no approved treatment for CHM.OBJECTIVE To assess the safety and efficacy of retinal gene therapy with an adeno-associated virus vector (AAV2) designed to deliver a functional version of the CHM gene (AAV2-REP1) for treatment of patients with choroideremia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Tübingen Choroideremia Gene Therapy (THOR) was a single-center, phase 2, open-label randomized clinical trial. Data were collected from January 11, 2016, to February 26, 2018. Twenty-four-month data are reported for 6 men with a molecularly confirmed diagnosis of CHM. Intention-to-treat analysis was used.INTERVENTIONS Patients received AAV2-REP1 by a single, 0.1-mL subretinal injection of 10 11 genome particles during vitrectomy into 1 eye randomly assigned to receive treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESPrimary end point was change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart from baseline to month 24 in the treated eye vs the control eye. Secondary end points included microperimetry variables, change in fundus autofluorescence, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic evaluations from baseline to month 24 in the treated eye vs the control eye. RESULTSOn enrollment, the mean (SD) age of the 6 men included in the study was 54.9 (4.1) years. The mean (SD) BCVA score was 60.3 (13.4) (approximately 20/63 Snellen equivalent) in the study eyes and 69.3 (20.6) (approximately 20/40 Snellen equivalent) in the control eyes. At 24 months, the BCVA change was 3.7 (7.5) in the treated eyes and 0.0 (5.1) in the control eyes (difference, 3.7; 95% CI, −7.2 to 14.5; P = .43). Mean change in retinal sensitivity was 10.3 (5.5) dB in the treated eyes and 9.7 (4.9) dB in the control eyes (difference, 0.6; 95% CI, −10.2 to 11.4; P = .74). A total of 28 adverse events were reported; all were consistent with the surgical procedure (eg, conjunctival hyperemia, foreign body sensation), and none were regarded as severe.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among 6 participants, gene therapy with AAV2-REP1 was associated with maintenance or improvement of visual acuity, although no significant difference was found from control eyes. All safety issues were associated with the surgical procedure and none were judged severe. Continued investigations could more precisely define the efficacy and safety of gene therapy with AAV2-REP1 in CHM.
Purpose: Choroideremia (CHM) is a rare inherited retinal degeneration resulting from mutation of the CHM gene, which results in absence of functional Rab escort protein 1 (REP1). We evaluated retinal gene therapy with an adeno-associated virus vector that used to deliver a functional version of the CHM gene (AAV2-REP1). Methods: THOR (NCT02671539) is a Phase 2, open-label, single-center, randomized study. Six male patients (51–60 years) with CHM received AAV2-REP1, by a single 0.1-mL subretinal injection of 1011 genome particles during vitrectomy. Twelve-month data are reported. Results: In study eyes, 4 patients experienced minor changes in best-corrected visual acuity (−4 to +1 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters); one gained 17 letters and another lost 14 letters. Control eyes had changes of −2 to +4 letters. In 5/6 patients, improvements in mean (95% confidence intervals) retinal sensitivity (2.3 [4.0] dB), peak retinal sensitivity (2.8 [3.5] dB), and gaze fixation area (−36.1 [66.9] deg2) were recorded. Changes in anatomical endpoints were similar between study and control eyes. Adverse events were consistent with the surgical procedure. Conclusion: Gene therapy with AAV2-REP1 can maintain, and in some cases, improve, visual acuity in CHM. Longer term follow-up is required to establish whether these benefits are maintained.
XLRP3 affects retinal structure and function symmetrically, supporting the use of the fellow eye as an internal control in interventional trials. VA and kinetic visual fields (III4e) seem promising functional outcome measures to assess disease progression. KMC analysis predicted the most severe decline in vision between the third and fourth decade of life.
Despite limited ONL thinning following SRi, the observed effect was under the predefined clinical significance threshold. The SRi has proven not to be inferior to the IVTi in terms of ONL thickness loss and estimated loss of visual acuity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.