Fifty of 100 persons who had undergone health screening received phosphate enema while the other 50 received glycerin enema prior to proctoscopy and barium enema, and their usefulness for preparation for colon examination was compared by a double-blind test. There was no significant difference in the degree of colonic cleansing achieved by proctoscopy and barium enema. In the subjects who received phosphate enema, the incidence of abdominal pain was less than that in those who received glycerin enema, while the effect of phosphate enema on defecation appeared later than that of glycerin enema, indicating prolonged stool retention in the subjects given phosphate enema. To study the safety of the two enemas, either phosphate enema, glycerin enema or physiological saline solution as a control was administered at 0.35 ml/animal in the rectum by 4-h closure of the anus in 10 male 7-week-old Wistar rats, and the rectal mucosa was observed for irritation macroscopically and histopathologically. Glycerin enema produced less irritation than phosphate enema diffusely in the entire area of the rectum, while phosphate enema produced more local irritation at the end of the rectum than glycerin enema. The differences in the extent of irritation and injury between phosphate and glycerin enemas were considered to be derived from differences in the pharmacologic actions of these drugs. If the extent of injury were included in the extent of irritation, the difference in irritation between phosphate and glycerin enemas would not be significant. As described above, no specific difference seem to exist in the usefulness of phosphate and glycerin enemas as preparation for colon examination.
The long-term prognosis of expanding bag dilatation therapy using a Matsuo pneumatic bag dilator was evaluated in 163 cases of esophageal achalasia treated by this method over the 26-year period from 1964 to 1989. In all these cases, one year or more had passed since therapy. Practically no correlation was found between the efficacy of the therapy and the grade of esophageal dilation prior to therapy, the previous history of symptomatic distress or the number of dilatations performed. The efficacy of expanding bag cardial dilatation was most obvious in the increase of body weight, 59 cases (36.2%) showing an increase of 1-5 kg and 48 cases (29.4%) showing an increase of 6-10 kg. The therapy was rated "highly effective" in 61 cases (37.4%) and "effective" in 60 cases (36.8%), i.e. it was effective in a total of 121 cases (74.2%). It was rated as being "ineffective" in 16 cases (9.8%) including 4.3% of cases in which an operation had been performed. This indicated that surgical operation of esophageal achalasia should be performed in those cases in which good long-term results were not obtained even after expanding bag dilatation therapy had been carried out several times.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.