This collection of essays brings together interdisciplinary perspectives that shed light on the complex relationship between totalitarian regimes, mass media, and the visual arts, starting from Fascism to its various modern and contemporary declinations and appropriations. The choice of the title explicit the editors' dual goal: on the one hand, the editors wish to " [highlight] the relationship between totalitarianisms and the visual arts" (IV); on the other hand, the ironic reference to Pop Art suggests how the common goal of totalitarian regimes is to reduce the participatory element to the minimum, canalizing citizens' creative energies towards the agenda of propaganda or-as in contemporary totalitarianisms-an anaesthetizing consumerism.The visual arts are present in the broadest sense of the term. In addition to painting, sculpture, and cinema, authors incorporate in the range of analysis "performance" and "plastic arts," such as "architecture, urban planning and the shaping and control of spaces, especially public ones" (XVII). This deliberately broad point of observation has the merit of favouring a multi-faceted perspective, ranging from several media, historical periods, and cultural spaces. The collection winds through six consistent sections, whose purpose is to show the diachronic evolution of the relationship between media, totalitarianisms, and individuals from historical Fascism to the global contemporary movements of the extreme right.Between these two chronological extremes, a disciplinary challenge of methodological interest opens up: at one extreme, bringing Fascism studies into conversation with those related to contemporary totalitarianisms; at the other extreme, gathering scholars from different disciplines and specializations. Italianists would be interested especially in the first two sections of the book: the first, "Totalitarian Environment: Spaces and Images," consists of four essays that investigate the relationship between propaganda and the visual arts during "historical" Fascism. Alessandra Minervino focuses on a case study of "politicization of religion," specifically that of the double biography of Mussolini and San Francesco, published in 1926 by the Franciscan father Paolo Ardali. Pierluigi Erbaggio focuses on an innovative aspect of the protean phenomenon of the Duce's representations between the wars, namely Mussolini's depiction in Fox and Hearst newsreels. It is
This article analyzes The Mandrake, a theater play written by Machiavelli which, on the one hand has many aspects in common with other writings by the Florentine author and, on the other, offers plenty of fresh and innovative nuances. Indeed, if this comedy deals with some of Machiavelli’s archetypical elements (such as Fortune and Virtue), one should also consider that the narration unfolds on a background that is neither necessarily historical, nor tragic and not even merely comical. As a consequence, this essay intends to apply to The Mandrake a category that may seem foreign to Machiavelli’s universe. A category developed centuries after the Florentine writer and influenced by authors and thinkers such as Pirandello and Bergson, but also by the likes of an erudite scholar and writer such as Umberto Eco. A category called ‘irony’, based on the definition offered by Vladimir Jankélévitch. The purpose of this article is to emphasize how the peculiarities of the ironic process prove to be useful in shedding some light on some aspects of this play, which cannot be analyzed as thoroughly by the classic interpretations usually applied to Machiavelli’s texts. In fact, the category of irony – being situated halfway between comedy and tragedy – offers new interpretations that allow us to fill the gap between the comical and the tragic aspects that characterize Machiavelli’s The Mandrake.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.