Abstract:Water repellency (WR) is a property that has implications on the hydrologic balance in affected soils. In semi-arid areas where water supply is limited, even slight WR may play an important role in the infiltration and spatial distribution of precipitation into the soil. Acidic and sandy-textured soils have been demonstrated to be more prone to develop WR, but there are studies reporting water repellent properties in other soil types. In the present study we investigated soil WR under four plant species in a semi-arid area with a calcareous, medium-textured forest soil. For this purpose, 160 soil samples were taken at micro-sites under different species (Pinus halepensis, Quercus coccifera, Juniperus oxycedrus and Rosmarinus officinalis). Soil WR was measured with the water drop penetration time (WDPT) test on air-dried samples. Samples with WDPT > 5 s were classified as water repellent. WR was present in 20% of the samples, and its persistence ranged mainly between 10 and 30 s. Under P. halepensis and Q. coccifera, WR occurred more frequently (40 and 30%, respectively) than under J. oxycedrus and R. officinalis (only 5% in both cases). In order to know the causes of the difference in occurrence of WR under the selected species and to establish relationships, soil organic matter (SOM) content and pH were measured for a selection of 66 samples, including all 32 water repellent and 34 wettable samples selected from those taken under the four species (n D 66). A negative relationship between WR and pH was found for all species. Moreover, in the case of P. halepensis soil samples, a positive correlation between WR and SOM content was found. A discriminant analysis allowed for the distinction between water repellent and wettable conditions in calcareous soils, based on the information provided by pH, SOM content and vegetation type. Soil pH turned out to be the most important parameter for discrimination. The hydrological and ecological implications from these results are discussed with special focus on the areas in the region extensively afforested with P. halepensis.
Unsuitable agricultural practices can cause loss in soil quality and erodibility to thus increase or trigger desertification under Mediterranean conditions. A field experiment was performed at the El Teularet‐Sierra de Enguera Experimental Station (eastern Spain) to assess the influence during a 5‐yr period of different agricultural practices on physical and chemical indicators of soil quality (total and water‐soluble carbohydrates, glomalin‐related soil proteins (GRSP), total organic carbon, aggregate stability (AS), vegetation cover and soil erosion). The management practices included residual herbicide use, ploughing, ploughing + oats, addition of oat straw mulch and a control (land abandonment). Adjacent soil under natural vegetation was used as a reference for local, high‐quality soil and as a control for comparison with the agricultural soils under different management practices. Oat straw mulching led to higher levels of water‐soluble carbohydrates, GRSP and AS and lower soil erosion rates, resulting in values similar to those in the soil under native vegetation. The lowest levels of carbohydrates and GRSP were for the plots that were treated with herbicide or were ploughed. The maintenance of and increases in stable aggregates promoted by the different agricultural management practices over the years were attributed to increases in labile organic fractions such as carbohydrates and to the GRSP content. The results demonstrate that land abandonment (control plot) or the use of a cover (plants or straw) contributes to increases in soil quality and reduces the risk of erosion. The research also shows that sustainable agricultural management allows soil to recover and that the use of straw mulching is the most effective management strategy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.