BackgroundPositive anticyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP+) is associated with bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, whether overall positivity or specific levels of anti-CCP are associated with prevalent fracture or a 10-year probability of fracture remains unclear.MethodsThis interim analysis of an RA registry was conducted at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Kaohsiung (CGMHK) for RA-related osteoporosis/fracture. Consecutive patients with RA who had visited the rheumatology clinic at CGMHK since September 1, 2014, and fulfilled the classification criteria of RA were enrolled. The demographics, disease duration, Disease activity in 28 joints based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), lifestyle, evidence of previous fracture, risk factors of fracture in the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®), and FRAX® score of each participant were collected. Anti-CCP, rheumatoid factor (RF), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and bone mineral density (BMD) were measured at enrollment. The patients were grouped by positivity or quartiles of anti-CCP level (I–IV).ResultsFive hundred twenty-one patients with RA were enrolled through May 31, 2016. In total, 359 (68.9%) patients were anti-CCP+. Compared with anti-CCP− patients, anti-CCP+ patients had a significantly higher DAS28-ESR (p = 0.0001) and 10-year probability of major (15.0 [18.9] vs. 12.0 [15.3], p = 0.0461) or hip (5.0 [9.2] vs. 3.6 [8.2], p = 0.0118) fracture, but a significantly lower BMD of the FN (p = 0.0196). The rates of osteoporosis and previous fracture were comparable. There were 130, 127, 132, and 132 patients in groups I–IV, respectively. The DAS28-ESR was significantly different (p = 0.0001) among the groups and correlated to anti-CCP levels. The BMD and 10-year probability of major (p = 0.0067) and hip (p = 0.0013) fracture among the groups were also different.ConclusionsAnti-CCP+ RA patients had a higher 10-year probability of major or hip fracture, independent of anti-CCP levels, and a lower BMD of the FN than anti-CCP− patients.
BackgroundThis study was aimed at determining the outcome and examining the association between comorbidities and mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage in chronic dialysis patients.MethodsWe used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database and enrolled patients who underwent maintenance dialysis between 2000 and 2007. Annual incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage in patients receiving dialysis from 2000 to 2007 was determined. To identify predictors of hemorrhagic stroke, we used logistic regression model to estimate the relative ratio of factors for intracerebral hemorrhage in the most recent cohort (2007). The cumulative survival rate and comorbid conditions associated with mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage among all dialysis patients between 2000 and 2007 was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis.ResultsWe identified 57,261 patients on maintenance dialysis in the cohort of 2007, and 340 patients had history of intracerebral hemorrhage among them. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity of dialysis patients. The incidence rate of intracerebral hemorrhage among dialysis patients was about 0.6%. Adjusted logistic regression model showed that male gender, middle age (45–64 years), hypertension, and previous history of stroke were the independent predictors for the occurrence of intracerebral hemorrhage among chronic dialysis patients. 1,939 dialysis patients with development of intracerebral hemorrhage in the analysis period from 2000 to 2007 were identified. In-hospital mortality was high (36.15%) following intracerebral hemorrhage. They were followed up after intracerebral hemorrhage for a mean time of 41.56 months. Adjusted Cox regression analyses demonstrated that the factors independently associated with mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage among dialysis patients included diabetes mellitus, malignancy and a history of prior stroke.ConclusionsDialysis patients who have history of prior stroke, diabetes and malignancy have worse survival than patients without these comorbidities. Attention must focus on providing optimal medical care after hemorrhagic stroke for these target groups to reduce mortality.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2369-15-186) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
BackgroundTo develop an OSTAi tool and compare this with the National Osteoporosis Foundation recommendations in 2013 (NOF 2013) for bone mineral density (BMD) testing among Taiwan postmenopausal women.MethodsTaiwan Osteoporosis Association (TOA) conducted a nationwide BMD survey by a bus installed with a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) between 2008 and 2011. All of the participants completed questionnaire, which included demographics and risk factors of osteoporotic fracture in FRAX tool. We used the database to analyze potential risk factors for osteoporosis and followed the model by Koh et al. to develop a risk index via multiple variable regression analysis and item reduction. We used the index values to set up a simple algorithm (namely OSTAi) to identify those who need BMD measurement. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) was used to compare the sensitivity/specificity analysis of this model with that of recommendations by NOF 2013.ResultsA total of 12,175 Taiwan postmenopausal women enrolled in this survey. The index value was derived by age and body weight of the participants according to weighted odds of each risk factor and the selected cutoff value was set at “-1”. There are 6393 (52.5%) participants whose index value is below “-1” and whose risk of osteoporosis was 57.5% (3674/6393). The AUC for OSTAi and NOF 2013 were 0.739 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.728–0.749, P<0.001) and 0.618 (95% CI, 0.606–0.630, P<0.001), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of OSTAi, at the selected cutoff value of -1, and NOF 2013 to identify osteoporosis were 73.1%, 62.0% and 78.3%, 45.7%, respectively.ConclusionsAs OSTA for Asian populations, OSTAi is an useful tool to identify Taiwan postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, In comparison with NOF 2013, OSTAi may be an easier and better tool for referral to BMD measurement by DXA in this area.
Aims Osteoporosis is one of the consequences of aging, and it remains underdiagnosed and undertreated; this study aimed to present the characteristics and prevalence of osteoporosis in elderly men by conducting a nationwide survey in Taiwan. Methods The participants were enrolled between 2008 and 2011, and bone mineral density (BMD) was measured via dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry for the hip (total), lumbar spine (L1‐4), and femoral neck (FN). Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, female patients, and those using steroids were excluded. Osteoporosis was defined as a T‐score at the FN of ≤−2.5. Results This study included 3734 men of mean age 70.0 ± 9.3 years, accounting for the prevalence of osteoporosis at 9.7%. Participants with osteoporosis had a significantly older age, lower body weight, shorter height and more previous fractures than those without osteoporosis. The mean BMD at FN was 0.534 ± 0.056 and 0.791 ± 0.115 (g/cm2) in participants with and without osteoporosis, respectively (P < 0.001). The FN and hip (total) BMD showed a significant negative correlation with age (r = −0.234, P < 0.001) and (r = −0.003, P < 0.001), respectively, but not at L1‐4 (r = 0.00, P = 0.540). A history of fracture is the most important risk factor associated with male osteoporosis (odds ratio, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.49‐4.21; P = 0.006). Conclusions The associated factors for male osteoporosis are aging, lower body weight, and a history of fracture; the BMDs at FN and hip (total), but not L1‐4, are inversely correlated with age. We recommend that BMD at the proximal femur be the preferred site to evaluate osteoporosis for elderly male subjects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.