No abstract

The interpretation of an unpublished data set of shallow stratigraphic cores and deep, seismic profiles from the northern Barents Shelf has provided new information about the Middle and Late Triassic development of the Barents Shelf and Svalbard. At that time, sediment sources along the eastern and south-eastern margins of the Barents Sea controlled the infilling of a previously deeper shelf area, gradually converting it into a paralic platform. Compared with the eastern source, sediment volumes from other areas were small. In our data, there are no indications of a provenance area north of Svalbard. Progradation from the ESE resulted in diachronous lithostratigraphic boundaries. The organic-rich shales of the Botneheia and Steinkobbe formations were deposited in the remaining deeper shelf areas in the western and north-western Barents Sea shelf, from the Olenekian to the latest Ladinian, by which time the progradation from the ESE had reached eastern Svalbard. In mid-Carnian times, the area of paralic deposits extended from the eastern Barents Sea into the Svalbard Archipelago.

No abstract

The interpretation of an unpublished data set of shallow stratigraphic cores and deep, seismic profiles from the northern Barents Shelf has provided new information about the Middle and Late Triassic development of the Barents Shelf and Svalbard. At that time, sediment sources along the eastern and southeastern margins of the Barents Sea controlled the infilling of a previously deeper shelf area, gradually converting it into a paralic platform. Compared with the eastern source, sediment volumes from other areas were small. In our data, there are no indications of a provenance area north of Svalbard. Progradation from the ESE resulted in diachronous lithostratigraphic boundaries. The organic-rich shales of the Botneheia and Steinkobbe formations were deposited in the remaining deeper shelf areas in the western and northwestern Barents Sea shelf, from the Olenekian to the latest Ladinian, by which time the progradation from the ESE had reached eastern Svalbard. In mid-Carnian times, the area of paralic deposits extended from the eastern Barents Sea into the Svalbard Archipelago.

The Johansen formation is a candidate site for large-scale CO 2 storage offshore of the southwestern coast of Norway. An overview of the geology for the Johansen formation and neighboring geological formations is given, together with a discussion of issues for geological and geophysical modelling and integrated fluid flow modelling. We further describe corresponding simulation models. Major issues to consider are capacity estimation and processes that could potentially cause CO 2 to leak out of the Johansen formation and into the formations above. Currently, these issues can only be investigated through numerical simulation. We consider the effect of different boundary conditions, sensitivity with respect to vertical grid refinement and permeability/transmisibility data, and the effect of residual gas saturations, since these strongly affect the CO 2 -plume distribution. The geological study of the Johansen formation is performed based on available seismic and well data. Fluid simulations are performed using a commercial simulator capable of modelling CO 2 flow and transport by simple manipulation of input files and data. We provide details for the data and the model, with a particular focus on geology and geometry for the Johansen formation. The data set is made available for download online.