On the path towards climate-neutral future mobility, the usage of synthetic fuels derived from renewable power sources, so-called e-fuels, will be necessary. Oxygenated e-fuels, which contain oxygen in their chemical structure, not only have the potential to realize a climate-neutral powertrain, but also to burn more cleanly in terms of soot formation. Polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers (PODE or OMEs) are a frequently discussed representative of such combustibles. However, to operate compression ignition engines with these fuels achieving maximum efficiency and minimum emissions, the physical-chemical behavior of OMEs needs to be understood and quantified. Especially the detailed characterization of physical and chemical properties of the spray is of utmost importance for the optimization of the injection and the mixture formation process. The presented work aimed to develop a comprehensive CFD model to specify the differences between OMEs and dodecane, which served as a reference diesel-like fuel, with regards to spray atomization, mixing and auto-ignition for single- and multi-injection patterns. The simulation results were validated against experimental data from a high-temperature and high-pressure combustion vessel. The sprays’ liquid and vapor phase penetration were measured with Mie-scattering and schlieren-imaging as well as diffuse back illumination and Rayleigh-scattering for both fuels. To characterize the ignition process and the flame propagation, measurements of the OH* chemiluminescence of the flame were carried out. Significant differences in the ignition behavior between OMEs and dodecane could be identified in both experiments and CFD simulations. Liquid penetration as well as flame lift-off length are shown to be consistently longer for OMEs. Zones of high reaction activity differ substantially for the two fuels: Along the spray center axis for OMEs and at the shear boundary layers of fuel and ambient air for dodecane. Additionally, the transient behavior of high temperature reactions for OME is predicted to be much faster.

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Synthetic fuels derived from renewable power sources, so-called e-fuels, will play a crucial role in achieving climate-neutral future mobility because they can be used in the existing fleets and in hard-to-decarbonize applications. In particular e-fuels that contain oxygen in their chemical structure can also burn more cleanly in terms of soot formation. For compression-ignition engines, polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers (PODEs or OMEs) are among the most promising candidates for such oxygenated e-fuels.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">Here, we investigated the characteristics of injection and combustion of OME_3-5 mixture compared to n-dodecane, a reference diesel-like fuel. Both single and multi-injection, comprising a short pilot injection, is used. Experiments were performed in a single-cylinder optically accessible Bowditch-type engine, injecting with 1500 bar pressure with a 3-hole injector (Spray B of the Engine Combustion Network). Liquid and vapor penetration were measured by imaging the spray illuminated by a pulsed light-emitting diode (LED). Ignition delay, lift-off length and flame morphology were investigated based on multi-spectral high-speed imaging of chemiluminescence. For simulations, a 3D CFD engine model was developed. The combustion simulation was performed on a 120° sector mesh onto which flow and turbulence fields from a gas exchange simulation are mapped prior to fuel injection. The model accounts for piston-ring blow-by. For the combustion of both fuels, detailed reaction mechanisms were used. In general, quite good agreement between model predictions and experimental results was achieved. In particular the consideration of blow-by losses by the CFD model produced a realistic behavior during the high-pressure cycle.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">Both CFD simulation and optical experiments, reveal significant differences between the two fuels. For OME, the liquid phase penetrates further into the combustion chamber, the ignition delay is shorter compared to n-dodecane and the equivalence ratio of OME during combustion is significantly leaner.</div></div>