At low temperature and in the presence of CF 3 COOH, SO 2 undergoes Diels-Alder additions with (E)-1-acetoxybutadiene (8d) giving a 1:10 mixture of diastereomeric 6-acetoxysultines (9d + 10d). The Van't Hoff plot for equilibria 8d + SO 2 a 9d + 10d led to ∆H r ) -7.0 ( 0.3 kcal/mol, ∆S r ) -42 ( 3 cal‚mol -1 ‚K -1 . At 20 °C, 8d underwent a slow cheletropic addition with SO 2 giving 2-acetoxysulfolene (11d, ∆H r = -11.5 kcal/mol), the structure of which was established by singlecrystal X-ray diffraction studies. (E)-Chloro (8e) and (E)-bromobutadiene (8f) did not undergo Diels-Alder additions with SO 2 , even in the presence of protic or Lewis acid promoters. Low yields of 2-chloro-(11e) and 2-bromosulfolene (11f) were obtained at 20 °C. The structure of 11e was confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The potential energy hypersurfaces of the Diels-Alder and cheletropic additions of SO 2 to butadiene (8a), (E)-piperilene (8b), (E)-1-methoxy-(8c), (E)-1-acetoxy-(8d), and (E)-1-chlorobutadiene (8e) were studied by ab initio quantum calculations at the MP2/6-31G* level. In agreement with the experiment, 6-substituted sultines 9X and 10X were less stable than the corresponding 2-substituted sulfolenes 11X for X ) Me, OAc, Cl. With X ) OMe, the two diastereomeric 6-methoxysultines (9c, 10c) and 2-methoxysulfolene (11c) were calculated to have similar stabilities. This is attributed to a stabilizing thermodynamic anomeric effect or gem-sulfinate/methoxy disubstitution effect in 9c, 10c. Such effects were not detected for sulfinate/acetoxy (9d, 10d) and sulfinate/chloro (9e, 10e) disubstitutions. The relative instability of 2-acetoxy-(11d) and 2-chlorosulfolene (11e) compared with their cycloaddents is attributed to repulsive interactions between the SO 2 moieties and the 2-substituents. The Alder endo mode of [4 + 2] cycloaddition of SO 2 is predicted to be faster than the "anti-Alder mode" of additions for dienes 8X, X ) Me, OMe, OAc, Cl. The resulting diastereomeric sultines 9X and 10X, respectively, exist as equilibria (energy barrier: ca. 5-6 kcal/mol) of two conformers 9X a 9′X, 10X a 10′X. In general, the conformers 9X, 10X with pseudoaxial SdO group are preferred (conformational anomeric effect of the sulfinate moiety). Repulsive interactions between pseudoaxial SdO and polar cis-6substituents (e.g.: X ) OMe, OAc) in 9X may render conformers 9′X (with the SdO and 6-X groups in pseudoequatorial positions) as stable as conformers 9X. The calculations predict the existence of conformational anomeric effects of 2-3 kcal/mol for the gem-sulfinate/methoxy (9c, 10′c) and gem-sulfinate/acetoxy disubstitution (9d, 10′d).
