Intrinsic antioxidant defenses are important for neuronal longevity. We found that in rat neurons, synaptic activity, acting via NMDA receptor (NMDAR) signaling, boosted antioxidant defenses by making changes to the thioredoxin-peroxiredoxin (Prx) system. Synaptic activity enhanced thioredoxin activity, facilitated the reduction of overoxidized Prxs and promoted resistance to oxidative stress. Resistance was mediated by coordinated transcriptional changes; synaptic NMDAR activity inactivated a previously unknown Forkhead box O target gene, the thioredoxin inhibitor Txnip. Conversely, NMDAR blockade upregulated Txnip in vivo and in vitro, where it bound thioredoxin and promoted vulnerability to oxidative damage. Synaptic activity also upregulated the Prx reactivating genes Sesn2 (sestrin 2) and Srxn1 (sulfiredoxin), via C/EBPbeta and AP-1, respectively. Mimicking these expression changes was sufficient to strengthen antioxidant defenses. Trans-synaptic stimulation of synaptic NMDARs was crucial for boosting antioxidant defenses; chronic bath activation of all (synaptic and extrasynaptic) NMDARs induced no antioxidative effects. Thus, synaptic NMDAR activity may influence the progression of pathological processes associated with oxidative damage.
N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) are critical for synaptic plasticity that underlies learning and memory. But, they have also been described as a common source of neuronal damage during stroke and neurodegenerative diseases. Several studies have suggested that cellular location of NMDARs (synaptic or extrasynaptic) is a key parameter controlling their effect on neuronal viability. The aim of the study was to understand the relation between these two pools of receptors and to determine their implication in both beneficial and/or deleterious events related to NMDAR activation. We demonstrated that selective extrasynaptic NMDAR activation, as well as NMDA bath application, does not activate extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathways, but induces mitochondrial membrane potential breakdown and triggers cell body and dendrite damages, whereas synaptic NMDAR activation is innocuous and induces a sustained ERK activation. The functional dichotomy between these two NMDAR pools is tightly controlled by glutamate uptake systems. Finally, we demonstrated that the only clinically approved NMDAR antagonist, memantine, preferentially antagonizes extrasynaptic NMDARs. Together, these results suggest that extrasynaptic NMDAR activation contributes to excitotoxicity and that a selective targeting of the extrasynaptic NMDARs represents a promising therapeutic strategy for brain injuries.
Synaptic activity promotes resistance to diverse apoptotic insults, the mechanism behind which is incompletely understood. We show here that a coordinated downregulation of core components of the intrinsic apoptosis pathway by neuronal activity forms a key part of the underlying mechanism. Activity-dependent protection against apoptotic insults is associated with inhibition of cytochrome c release in most but not all neurons, indicative of anti-apoptotic signaling both upstream and downstream of this step. We find that enhanced firing activity suppresses expression of the proapoptotic BH3-only member gene Puma in a NMDA receptor-dependent, p53-independent manner. Puma expression is sufficient to induce cytochrome c loss and neuronal apoptosis. Puma deficiency protects neurons against apoptosis and also occludes the protective effect of synaptic activity, while blockade of physiological NMDA receptor activity in the developing mouse brain induces neuronal apoptosis that is preceded by upregulation of Puma. However, enhanced activity can also confer resistance to Puma-induced apoptosis, acting downstream of cytochrome c release. This mechanism is mediated by transcriptional suppression of apoptosome components Apaf-1 and procaspase-9, and limiting caspase-9 activity, since overexpression of procaspase-9 accelerates the rate of apoptosis in active neurons back to control levels. Synaptic activity does not exert further significant anti-apoptotic effects downstream of caspase-9 activation, since an inducible form of caspase-9 overrides the protective effect of synaptic activity, despite activity-induced transcriptional suppression of caspase-3. Thus, suppression of apoptotic gene expression may synergize with other activity-dependent events such as enhancement of antioxidant defenses to promote neuronal survival.
Neuronal death after ischemia-induced brain damage depends largely upon the activation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) excitatory glutamate receptor that is a target for many putative neuroprotective agents. Whereas the NMDA receptors mediate ischemic brain damage, blocking them is deleterious in humans. Here, the authors investigated whether nitrous oxide or xenon, which are gaseous anesthetics with a remarkably safe clinical profile that have been recently demonstrated as effective inhibitors of the NMDA receptor, may reduce the following: (1) ischemia-induced brain damage in vivo, when given after occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCAO), a condition needed to make these potentially neuroprotective agents therapeutically valuable; or (2) NMDA-induced Ca2+ influx in cortical cell cultures, a major critical event involved in excitotoxic neuronal death. The authors have shown that both nitrous oxide at 75 vol% and xenon at 50 vol% reduce ischemic neuronal death in the cortex by 70% and further decrease NMDA-induced Ca2+ influx by 30%. In addition, xenon at 50%, but not nitrous oxide at 75 vol%, further decreases ischemic brain damage in the striatum (a subcortical structure that is known to be resistant to neuroprotective interventions). However, at a higher concentration (75 vol%), xenon exhibits potentially neurotoxic effects. The mechanisms of the neuroprotective and potentially neurotoxic effects of nitrous oxide and xenon, as well as the possible therapeutic implications in humans, are discussed.
Peroxiredoxins are an important family of cysteine‐based antioxidant enzymes that exert a neuroprotective effect in several models of neurodegeneration. However, under oxidative stress they are vulnerable to inactivation through hyperoxidation of their active site cysteine residues. We show that in cortical neurons, the chemopreventive inducer 3H‐1,2‐dithiole‐3‐thione (D3T), that activates the transcription factor Nuclear factor erythroid 2‐related factor (Nrf2), inhibits the formation of inactivated, hyperoxidized peroxiredoxins following oxidative trauma, and protects neurons against oxidative stress. In both neurons and glia, Nrf2 expression and treatment with chemopreventive Nrf2 activators, including D3T and sulforaphane, up‐regulates sulfiredoxin, an enzyme responsible for reducing hyperoxidized peroxiredoxins. Induction of sulfiredoxin expression is mediated by Nrf2, acting via a cis‐acting antioxidant response element (ARE) in its promoter. The ARE element in Srxn1 contains an embedded activator protein‐1 (AP‐1) site which directs induction of Srxn1 by synaptic activity. Thus, raising Nrf2 activity in neurons prevents peroxiredoxin hyperoxidation and induces a new member of the ARE‐gene family, whose enzymatic function of reducing hyperoxidized peroxiredoxins may contribute to the neuroprotective effects of Nrf2 activators.
In previously proposed models of A beta soluble oligomers, the N-terminal domain A beta(1-16), which is missing in p3 peptides, protects the hydrophobic core of the oligomers from the solvent. Without this N-terminal part, oligomers of p3 peptides would likely expose hydrophobic residues to water and would consequently be less stable. We thus suggest, based on theoretical and experimental results, that p3 peptides would have a low propensity to assemble into stable oligomers, evolving then directly to fibrillar aggregates. These properties may explain why p3 would be devoid of any impact on synaptic function and moreover, strengthen the hypothesis that A beta oligomers are the principal synaptotoxic forms of A beta peptides in Alzheimer disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.