Current pharyngeal deglutition theory has stressed the role of the pharyngeal constrictors as producing a peristaltic wave responsible for bolus propulsion through the pharynx. This thesis presents data obtained using manofluorography which supports the significance of tongue and laryngeal motion in swallowing. The usage of the term peristalsis to describe the constrictor contraction is challenged. The results of this quantitative study of swallowing in normal subjects, laryngectomized patients, and patients with restricted tongue motion show that tongue driving pressure and the negative pressure developed in the pharyngeal esophageal segment appear more important than the peristaltic-like pressure of the constrictors. Bolus transit is really dependent upon these two pressures. This model for analysis has clinical significance because it permits quantification of the pharyngeal swallowing mechanism.

Contrary to the current theory of oral and oropharyngeal reconstruction, we found that the use of primary closure resulted in equal or better function than the use of flap reconstruction in patients with a comparable locus of resection and percentage of oral tongue and tongue base resection.

The purpose of this study was to assess the postoperative functioning of oral cancer patients with resections of the anterior tongue and floor of mouth, reconstructed with distal flap closure. Speech and swallowing performance was assessed for 11 men and 5 women preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively following a standardized protocol. Speech tasks included an audio recording of a brief conversation and of a standard articulation test; swallowing function was examined using videofluoroscopy. Data were also collected on the number and duration of speech/swallowing treatment sessions, as well as the amount and duration of radiation therapy. Statistical analyses revealed that patients demonstrated a significant and severe impairment in speech and swallow functioning after surgery, with no recovery of function by 3 months post-healing. The degree of impairment in these patients may be related to the adynamic character of the distal flap used for reconstruction. Lack of improvement at the 3-month evaluation may be related to either the timing of postoperative radiation therapy or the low rate (44%) and amount of speech/swallowing treatment provided to these patients.

The lack of improvement between 1 and 12 months postsurgery may be related to the relatively small amount of therapy that these patients received during that period. Several outcome variables worsened significantly at the 6-month evaluation; the reversal of function at the 6-month evaluation point could be the effect of postoperative radiotherapy, because irradiated and nonirradiated patients differed in their pattern of recovery on oropharyngeal swallow efficiency and several speech variables.

Speech and swallowing function was examined in 11 patients who underwent surgical resection of greater than 1 cm of tongue base, tonsil, and faucial arch with mandible resected on the side of the tumor and reconstruction by primary closure. Preoperatively and 1 and 3 months post-healing, high fidelity audio recordings were made of a 6- to 7-minute conversational speech sample, the sentence version of The Fisher Logemann Test of Articulation Competence was administered, and videofluoroscopic assessment of oropharyngeal swallow was conducted. All subjects exhibited changes in speech and swallowing function postoperatively, with little improvement during the study. Patients exhibited greatest difficulty on stop and fricative consonants and bolus propulsion. Comparison with patients who received anterior tongue and floor of mouth resections and distal flap reconstruction revealed consistently better speech performance by the tonsil/base of tongue patients, although the same phonemes were affected. Swallow function was equally affected in the two groups. Results are discussed in terms of locus of surgical resection, nature of reconstruction, and need for swallowing therapy.