Herpesviruses establish a lifelong latent infection posing the risk for virus reactivation and disease. In cytomegalovirus infection, expression of the major immediate early (IE) genes is a critical checkpoint, driving the lytic replication cycle upon primary infection or reactivation from latency. While it is known that type I interferon (IFN) limits lytic CMV replication, its role in latency and reactivation has not been explored. In the model of mouse CMV infection, we show here that IFNβ blocks mouse CMV replication at the level of IE transcription in IFN-responding endothelial cells and fibroblasts. The IFN-mediated inhibition of IE genes was entirely reversible, arguing that the IFN-effect may be consistent with viral latency. Importantly, the response to IFNβ is stochastic, and MCMV IE transcription and replication were repressed only in IFN-responsive cells, while the IFN-unresponsive cells remained permissive for lytic MCMV infection. IFN blocked the viral lytic replication cycle by upregulating the nuclear domain 10 (ND10) components, PML, Sp100 and Daxx, and their knockdown by shRNA rescued viral replication in the presence of IFNβ. Finally, IFNβ prevented MCMV reactivation from endothelial cells derived from latently infected mice, validating our results in a biologically relevant setting. Therefore, our data do not only define for the first time the molecular mechanism of IFN-mediated control of CMV infection, but also indicate that the reversible inhibition of the virus lytic cycle by IFNβ is consistent with the establishment of CMV latency.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) evades the immune system in many different ways, allowing the virus to grow and its progeny to spread in the face of an adverse environment. Mounting evidence about the antiviral role of myeloid immune cells has prompted the research of CMV immune evasion mechanisms targeting these cells. Several cells of the myeloid lineage, such as monocytes, dendritic cells and macrophages, play a role in viral control, but are also permissive for CMV and are naturally infected by it. Therefore, CMV evasion of myeloid cells involves mechanisms that qualitatively differ from the evasion of non-CMV-permissive immune cells of the lymphoid lineage. The evasion of myeloid cells includes effects in cis, where the virus modulates the immune signaling pathways within the infected myeloid cell, and those in trans, where the virus affects somatic cells targeted by cytokines released from myeloid cells. This review presents an overview of CMV strategies to modulate and evade the antiviral activity of myeloid cells in cis and in trans.

In healthy individuals

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a ubiquitous beta-herpesvirus whose reactivation from latency is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised hosts. Mouse CMV (MCMV) is a well-established model virus to study virus-host interactions. We showed in this study that the CD8-independent antiviral function of myeloid dendritic cells (mDC) is biologically relevant for the inhibition of MCMV replication in vivo and in vitro. In vivo ablation of CD11c ؉ DC resulted in higher viral titers and increased susceptibility to MCMV infection in the first 3 days postinfection. We developed in vitro coculture systems in which we cocultivated MCMV-infected endothelial cells or fibroblasts with T cell subsets and/or dendritic cells. H uman cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a betaherpesvirus which establishes a lifelong latent infection in immunocompetenthosts. Latent HCMV is present in the majority of people worldwide, but the primary infection is usually asymptomatic. The primary infection is well contained by the immune cells, such as natural killer (NK) cells and T cells, which also prevent viral reactivation from latency (1, 2).Their activation depends on cross talk with dendritic cells (DC) (3, 4), and this interaction plays an important role in CMV control (5-7). The direct effect of DC on viral replication remains, however, unclear.In immunocompromised hosts, like AIDS patients or people undergoing transplantation, the virus cannot be contained, and its reactivation from latency has been associated with severe disease (8). Therefore, to develop new therapeutic approaches against CMV disease, it is exceedingly important to understand the immune mechanisms that drive the virus into latency.Murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) is a natural pathogen of the mouse. It shows numerous analogies in latency and reactivation to the human virus, and its genome displays substantial similarity to the HCMV one (9). Therefore, MCMV is a widely used model for CMV infection and immunity (10)(11)(12).During primary infection, MCMV infects various different cell types, such as macrophages and DC but also nonhematopoietic cells, including endothelial and epithelial cells (13). On the other hand, the establishment of latency appears to be restricted to certain cell types. Latent HCMV was found in blood monocytes and in progenitor cells of the myeloid lineage (14-19), whereas liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSEC) were shown to be a site of MCMV latency and reactivation (20, 21), although myeloid cells might also present a latent reservoir in the mouse (22, 23).

BackgroundThe MCMV major immediate early promoter/enhancer (MIEP) is a bidirectional promoter that drives the expression of the three immediate early viral genes, namely ie1, ie2 and ie3. The regulation of their expression is intensively studied, but still incompletely understood.MethodsWe constructed a reporter MCMV, (MCMV-MIEPr) expressing YFP and tdTomato under the control of the MIEP as proxies of ie1 and ie2, respectively. Moreover, we generated a liver sinusoidal endothelial cell line (LSEC-uniLT) where cycling is dependent on doxycycline. We used these novel tools to study the kinetics of MIEP-driven gene expression in the context of infection and at the single cell level by flow cytometry and by live imaging of proliferating and G0-arrested cells.ResultsMCMV replicated to higher titers in G0-arrested LSEC, and cycling cells showed less cytopathic effect or YFP and tdTomato expression at 5 days post infection. In the first 24 h post infection, however, there was no difference in MIEP activity in cycling or G0-arrested cells, although we could observe different profiles of MIEP gene expression in different cell types, like LSECs, fibroblasts or macrophages. We monitored infected LSEC-uniLT in G0 by time lapse microscopy over five days and noticed that most cells survived infection for at least 96 h, arguing that quick lysis of infected cells could not account for the spread of the virus. Interestingly, we noticed a strong correlation between the ratio of median YFP and tdTomato expression and length of survival of infected cells.ConclusionBy means of our newly developed genetic tools, we showed that the expression pattern of MCMV IE1 and IE2 genes differs between macrophages, endothelial cells and fibroblasts. Substantial and cell-cycle independent differences in the ie1 and ie2 transcription could also be observed within individual cells of the same population, and marked ie2 gene expression was associated with longer survival of the infected cells.

No abstract