The present study was concerned with the effects of conflict type and shock stress on arousal and conflict resolution. Subjects were randomly assigned to either stress (random shock) or non‐stress conditions. Each subject was exposed to three trials of each of the four Lewinian conflict types and three control trials, interspersed among additional non‐conflict trials. Resolution performance was assessed in terms of speed of resolution and error frequency. Phasic electrodermal responsivity served as a measure of arousal. Results supported several hypotheses. It was found that both stress and conflict increased the magnitude of electrodermal responses and that larger responses occurred under more difficult conflicts. In addition, increased conflict difficulty produced lower speeds, and stress increased errors. Finally, stress caused a greater increase in error frequency on conflict than on control trials. Results were discussed in terms of arousal and stress hypotheses found in the theories of Lewin and Dollard & Miller.
Psychodynamic, learning and field theories have postulated that conflict increases arousal. Lewin has further suggested that more difficult conflicts produce proportionately greater arousal increments and that arousal is also a function of field structure, hypotheses that are consistent with optimal level theory. Moreover, studies involving open conflict fields and those involving maze fields differ importantly in findings. The present study measured both arousal and motor responses as a function of conflict type and field structure. Using paper-and-pencil fields, subjects performed under four different types of conflict and a control condition. Results showed that arousal increased significantly with increasing conflict complexity and were habitual over repeated trials, though arousal did not differentiate field conditions. Response speed was higher in the open field than in the maze field, and the relative speeds of the several conflict types varied as a function of field condition. In addition, speed increased over trials, but the rate of increase was greater for some conflicts than others. Response adequacy was greater in the open field than in the maze field condition, and response mode differentiated significantly between field types on early trials. Relevant results were partially supportive of hypotheses derived from optimal level and Lewinian theories. ~~~~
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.