No abstract

Especially for cannabinoids, analytical procedures for the verification of recent use and generally for the assessment of the extent of drug abuse are of interest in clinical and forensic toxicology. For confirmation of abstinence, urine analysis seems to be a useful tool. Serial monitoring of THC-COOH to creatinine ratios can differentiate between recent drug use and residual THC-COOH excretion (THC-COOH/creatinine ratio Z0.5 compared with previous specimen ratio). For an assessment of the extent of cannabis use, the determination of free and bound THC-COOH and especially of THC and 11-OH-THC glucuronides are suggested as useful but need further confirmation. Blood analysis is preferred for the interpretation of acute effects after cannabis abuse. The cannabis influence factor (CIF) was demonstrated as a better tool to interpret the concentrations of THC and its metabolites in blood in forensic cases and therefore it was proposed to assume absolute driving inability because of cannabis intoxication from a CIF Z10. Additionally, a higher CIF is indicative of a recent cannabis abuse. Also discrimination between occasional use of cannabis and regular drug consumption is possible by analysis of THC-COOH in blood samples because of the long plasma half-life of THC-COOH and its accumulation in the blood of frequent cannabis consumers. In routine tests, blood samples have to be taken within a prescribed 8-day-period, and a THC-COOH concentration >75 ng/mL is assumed to be associated with regular consumption of cannabis products, whereas plasma THC-COOH concentrations <5 ng/mL are associated with occasional consumption. In contrast to other illicit drugs, hair analysis lacks the sensitivity to act as a detector for cannabinoids. THC and especially the main metabolite THC-COOH have a very low incorporation rate into hair and THC is not highly bound to melanin, resulting in much lower concentrations in hair compared with other drugs. Additionally, THC is present in cannabis smoke and also can be incorporated into the hair only by contamination. For the determination of the main metabolite THC-COOH in the picogram or femtogram per milligram range, which indicates an active consumption, special analytical procedures, such as GC/MS/MS techniques, are required.

The influence of CYP2D6 genotype and CYP2D6 inhibitors on enantiomeric plasma levels of tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol as well as response to tramadol was investigated. One hundred and seventy-four patients received one hundred intravenous tramadol 3 mg/kg for postoperative analgesia. Blood samples drawn 30, 90, and 180 min after administration were analyzed for plasma concentrations of the enantiomers (+)-, (-)tramadol and (+)-, (-)O-desmethyltramadol by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Different CYP2D6 genotypes displaying zero (poor metabolizer (PM)), one (heterozygous individual (HZ)/intermediate metabolizer (IM)), two extensive metabolizer (EM), and three (ultra rapid metabolizer (UM)) active genes were compared. Concentrations of O-desmethyltramadol differed in the four genotype groups. Median (1/3 quartile) area under the concentration-time curves for (+)O-desmethyltramadol were 0 (0/11.4), 38.6 (15.9/75.3), 66.5 (17.1/118.4), and 149.7 (35.4/235.4) ng x h/ml for PMs, HZ/IMs, EMs, and UMs (P<0.001). Comedication with CYP2D6 inhibitors decreased (+) O-desmethyltramadol concentrations (P<0.01). In PMs, non-response rates to tramadol treatment increased fourfold compared with the other genotypes (P<0.001). In conclusion, CYP2D6 genotype determined concentrations of O-desmethyltramadol enantiomers and influenced efficacy of tramadol treatment.

Recreational use of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists-so-called "Spice" products-became very popular during the last few years. Several reports on clinical symptoms and poisonings were published. Unfortunately, most of these reports do not contain any analytical data on synthetic cannabinoids in body fluids, and no or only a limited number of cases were reported concerning driving under the influence (DUI) of this kind of drugs. In this article, several cases of DUI of synthetic cannabinoids (AM-2201, JWH-018, JWH-019, JWH-122, JWH-210, JWH-307, MAM-2201 (JWH-122 5-fluoropentyl derivative), and UR-144) are presented, focusing on analytical results and signs of impairment documented by the police or the physicians who had taken the blood sample from the suspects. Consumption of synthetic cannabinoids can lead to impairment similar to typical performance deficits caused by cannabis use which are not compatible with safe driving. These deficits include centrally sedating effects and impairment of fine motor skills necessary for keeping the vehicle on track. Police as well as forensic toxicologists and other groups should become familiar with the effects of synthetic cannabinoid use, and be aware of the fact that drug users may shift to these "legal" alternatives due to their nondetectability by commonly used drug screening tests based on antibodies. Sophisticated screening procedures covering the complete range of available compounds or their metabolites have to be developed for both blood/serum and urine testing.

We observed opioid-related respiratory depression in a patient receiving tramadol via patient-controlled analgesia. Predisposing factors were the patient's genetic background and renal impairment. Complete recovery occurred after naloxone administration, thus confirming opioid intoxication. Analysis of the patient's genotype revealed a CYP2D6 gene duplication resulting in ultra-rapid metabolism of tramadol to its active metabolite (+)O-desmethyltramadol. Concomitant renal impairment resulting in decreased metabolite clearance enhanced opioid toxicity. This genetic CYP2D6 variant is particularly common in specific ethnic populations and should be a future diagnostic target whenever administration of tramadol or codeine is anticipated, as both drugs are subject to a comparable CYP2D6-dependent metabolism.