Transorbital penetrating injury (TPI), an uncommon subset of head trauma, requires prompt multidisciplinary surgical intervention. While numerous case reports appear in the literature, there is a lack of discrete recommendations for initial evaluation, surgical intervention, and postoperative care of patients with TPI. A retrospective review of 4 cases of TPI at the University of Michigan Health System was undertaken to assess for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. In addition, a PubMed search using the terms "penetrating orbital trauma," "penetrating orbital injury," "transorbital penetration," and "transorbital penetrating injury" were used to search for articles discussing the presentation and management of penetrating orbital trauma. All 4 of the patients at the University of Michigan underwent focused physical examination performed by a multidisciplinary trauma team followed by dedicated maxillofacial and head CT scanning. The patients' treatments varied, depending on the mechanism and extent of the injury. An analysis of the case series presented here as well as other published cases suggests an algorithm for diagnosis and treatment for patients with TPI, which includes focused evaluation, diagnostic imaging with maxillofacial CT scanning, and management of the injury that focuses on the path of penetration and the presence of the foreign body in situ at the time of presentation. Magnetic resonance imaging is indicated in patients who have indwelling wooden foreign bodies. Angiography should be performed in patients with suspected vascular injury. Treatment decisions should be made by a multidisciplinary team with input from neurosurgery, ophthalmology, otolaryngology, and maxillofacial surgery.

Spinal lipomas are a common cause of spinal cord tethering. Recently, prophylactic surgical removal of spinal lipomas has been questioned, especially of the conus medullaris. Unfortunately, few statistically significant series have been reported. A total of 213 children with spinal lipomas were operated on at the Children’s Memorial Hospital in Chicago, Ill., USA, on whom 270 procedures were carried out between 1975 and 1995. The status of these children was retrospectively reviewed to determine the differences in outcome between patients prophylactically operated on before the onset of symptoms and those operated on after the onset of symptoms. Fifty-five patients presented with a lipoma of the filum terminale and 158 with a lipoma of the conus medullaris. In the filum terminale group, 28 were asymptomatic at the initial operation, and 27 presented with symptoms. Of the asymptomatic children with filum terminale lipomas, none worsened after surgery, and all remained asymptomatic throughout follow-up (mean follow-up: 3.4 years). Benefits were also observed for the symptomatic patients in this group as no cases of further deterioration were noted, and 5 patients returned to normal clinical status. In the conus group, 71 patients were asymptomatic at initial surgery, and 87 presented with symptoms. In the case of conus medullaris lipomas, 9 of the 71 children who were operated on prophylactically, later deteriorated (mean follow-up: 6.2 years) and required a second untethering operation which resolved all symptoms in 4 cases. Thus, 5 of 71 deteriorated, while 66 remained normal (93%) throughout the period of follow-up. On the other hand, of the 87 patients operated on after the onset of symptoms, 36 (41%) deteriorated further and required subsequent reoperations. In these 87 children, the final outcome at the end of follow-up (mean follow-up: 6.6 years) showed that 20 (23%) patients had deteriorated compared to initial presentation and 44 (51 %) remained at initial clinical baseline, while 23 (26%) improved or returned to normal clinical status. Prophylactic surgery in the case of the asymptomatic infant with a spinal lipoma showed a clear benefit. Good outcome was also observed when surgery was carried out after the onset of symptoms. Prophylactic surgery also had a better general outcome by actuarial calculations when only patients with a follow-up of more than 5 years were considered. Deterioration occurred in 5 (16.7%) of the 30 children with a follow-up of more than 5 years, while 25 (83.3%) remained normal. Furthermore, in cases which had prophylactic surgery, there was not only a smaller incidence of deterioration requiring a reoperation, but this group of patients also experienced a longer time interval between initial surgery and the need for reoperation compared to the patients operated on after the onset of symptoms. The authors conclude that spinal lipomas should be operated on as soon as possible on a prophylactic basis, and careful and constant follow-up should be carried out to permit prompt reinterv...

Introduction First described in 1927, a Schmorl's node (SN) is the herniation of nucleus pulposus (NP) through the cartilaginous and bony end plate into the body of the adjacent vertebra. SNs are common findings on imaging, and although most SNs are asymptomatic, some have been shown to become painful lesions. In this manuscript, we review the literature regarding the epidemiology, clinical presentation, pathogenesis, imaging, and management of SNs. Materials and methods Using databases from the US National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health, relevant articles were identified. Results While several theories regarding the pathogenesis of SNs have been proposed, an axial load model appears to have the greatest supporting evidence. Symptomatic SNs are thought to be due to the inflammatory response solicited by the herniation of NP into the wellvascularized vertebral body. Management options for symptomatic SNs vary, ranging from medical management to surgical fusion. Conclusion SNs are common lesions that are often asymptomatic. In certain cases, SNs can cause back pain. No consensus on pathogenesis exists. There is no established treatment modality for symptomatic SNs.

There is no definitive association between BMPs and the promotion of tumorigenesis or metastasis. However, given the relatively large number of studies reporting a positive effect of BMPs on tumorigenesis or metastasis, the use of BMPs in patients with primary or metastatic spinal tumors should be carefully considered.