Background The extreme social circumstances caused by declared COVID-19 pandemic deeply intervene people’s everyday life and should not be neglected but seen through the view of social reality pinpointing the ‘ordinary’ people. In this article, authors explored basic segments of everyday and their subjective perception to what extent sleeping habits, physical inactivity, physical activity, nutritional habits and smoking have changed. Methods The online survey was conducted in nine European countries (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Greece, Kosovo*, Italy, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia and Spain) in 4108 participants, aged 15–82 years. The survey took place 30–40 days after World Health Organization declared COVID-19 pandemic state, from 15 April to 3 May 2020. Results The results have shown 30 min longer sleeping time, 50% longer physical inactivity time, 65% longer screen time, 43% shorter walking time, 24% shorter sport time and 37% longer physical work time. Additionally, body mass gains (0.3 kg) could be explained in 20.6% with meals sizes, unhealthy food consumption, screen time and sport time. Further, respondents reported more regular meals (44%) and healthier meals with less alcohol consumption and less smoking, which have been positive outcomes of home confinement. Conclusion The findings draw attention to negative changes in everyday praxis (inactivity, body mass gain) after such a short period. Because of possible risk to population’s health (especially of countries such as Italy and Spain with serious threat and more stringent measures), findings enable development of recommendations for maintaining healthy lifestyle habits with minimal negative health consequences in similar pandemic circumstances.

In regularly dialyzed patients a variety of pathological events can negatively influence haemodynamics and blood flow through arterio-venous fistula, leading to inadequate blood flow through the dialyzer or disturbances in hemodynamics of the whole body. It therefore appears important to quantify flow velocity and volume flow through the arteriovenous fistula in such cases. We used a Vasoview computer controlled system for noninvasive vascular diagnostics based on B-scan "real-time" ultrasound for imaging the structure of tissue, combined with pulsed Doppler ultrasound for determination of hemodynamics. Thirty patients (16 males and 14 females, aged 45 +/- 10 years; range 23 to 61 years), with different periods spent on hemodialysis (5.5 +/- 3.1 years, range 1 to 11 years) were included in this study. The average systolic, diastolic and mean blood volume flows were 2131.8 +/- 565.8, 972.0 +/- 309.6 and 728.4 +/- 287.4 ml/min, respectively. The mean blood volume flow was calculated by integration of the area under curve of blood flow in one heart cycle on the Doppler signal. It is calculated by the apparatus and displayed on the screen during measurement. The average blood vessel diameter was 9.1 +/- 1.3 mm (mu +/- omega). The results revealed a marked inter-individual variation in volume flow through arteriovenous fistulae of dialyzed uremics (range 240.0 to 1200.0 ml/min). Doppler ultrasound thus appears to be a valuable method for determination of blood flow through arteriovenous fistula of dialyzed uremics as well as for detection of hemodynamics disturbances of interest, such as turbulent blood flow.

The current study investigated the motives that underlie support for COVID-19 preventive behaviorsin a large, cross-cultural sample of 12,758 individuals from 34 countries. We hypothesized that the associations of empathic prosocial concern and fear of disease, with support towards preventive COVID-19 behaviors would be moderated by the individual-level and country-level trust in the government. Results suggest that the association between fear of disease and support for COVID-19 preventive behaviors was strongest when trust in the government was weak (both at individual and country-level). Conversely, the association with empathic prosocial concern was strongest when trust was high, but this moderation was only found at individual-level scores of governmental trust. We discuss how both fear and empathy motivations to support preventive COVID-19 behaviors may be shaped by socio-cultural context, and outline how the present findings may contribute to a better understanding of collective action during global crises.