No abstract

No abstract

SUMMARYWe describe a colloidal gold immunolabeling technique for electron microscopy which allows one to differentially visualize portions of DNA replicated during different periods of S-phase. This was performed by incorporating two halogenated deoxyuridines (IdUrd and CldUrd) into Chinese hamster cells and, after cell processing, by detecting them with selected antibodies. This technique, using in particular appropriate blocking solutions and also Tris buffer with a high salt concentration and 1% Tween-20, prevents nonspecific background and crossreaction of both antibodies. Controls such as digestion with DNase and specific staining of DNA with osmium ammine show that labeling corresponds well to replicated DNA. Different patterns of labeling distribution, reflecting different periods of DNA replication during S-phase, were characterized. Cells in early S-phase display a diffuse pattern of labeling with many spots, whereas cells in late S-phase show labeling confined to larger domains, often at the periphery of the nucleus or associated with the nucleolus. The good correlation between our observations and previous double labeling results in immunofluorescence also proved the technique to be reliable.

No abstract

The model of in situ DNA replication provided by immunofluorescence and confocal imaging is compared with observations obtained by electron microscopic studies. Discrepancies between both types of observations call into question the replication focus as a persistent nuclear structure and as a replication entity where DNA replication takes place. Most electron microscopic analyses reveal that replication sites are confined to dispersed chromatin areas at the periphery of condensed chromatin, and the distribution of replication factors exhibits the same localization pattern. Moreover, rapid migration of newly synthesized DNA from the replication sites towards the interior of condensed chromatin regions obviously takes place during S-phase. It implies modifications of replication domains, hardly detectable by fluorescence microscopy. The confrontation of different observations carried out at light microscopic or electron microscopic levels of resolution lead to a conclusion that a combination of in vivo fluorescence analysis with a subsequent ultrastructural investigation performed on the same cells will represent an optimal approach in future studies of nuclear functions in situ.