During the recent decades, soaring progresses in vascular disease knowledge, particularly in critical limb ischemia (CLI) treatment, enhanced novel diagnostic and interventional strategies with high serviceableness in patient's selection, arterial recanalization, and dedicated ischemic ulcer follow-up. However, despite undeniable advances in medical technology and clinical judgment, limb salvage, the ambulation recovery, and patient's survival seem only scarcely affected in this heterogeneous CLI group, particularly concerning the diabetic and renal patients. Innovative strategies such as "end artery occlusive disease" treatment or "wound-targeted revascularization" were equally proposed by following the angiosomal anatomical distribution associating individual foot collateral assessment in a unified macro-and micro-circulatory judgment. However, despite encouraging clinical results, prospective evidence still lacks on this concern. It also appears that specific wounds could not always stand for the lowest perfusion areas according to current CLI criteria, since severe neuropathy, inflammatory swelling, local infection, and skin trauma may add complementary hindrances to tissue viability.The present chapter endeavor to summarize main available treatment principles for ischemic ulcer recovery that every modern practitioner eventually disposes in an updated contemporary view."

Objective: The present study was conceived to analyze the clinical benefit of hybrid interventions with surgical common femoral artery (CFA) reconstruction coupled to superficial femoral/popliteal endovascular recanalization for severe infrainguinal multilevel occlusive disease in high-risk ASA Class 3-4 patients. Material and Methods: From August 2008 until May 2015, a series of 143 hybrid infrainguinal interventions in 124 ASA Class 3-4 patients were performed in our department for Rutherford category 2-6 ischemic presentations. Patient demographics, specific risk factors, technical characteristics and patency results were retrospectively examined during a mean 36.8 months of follow-up. In a majority of 94 limbs (65%), the endovascular stage of interventions focused on long (>15 cm) femoropopliteal occlusions in parallel to regular CFA surgical revascularization. Two or three runoff tibial trunks were evinced in 84% cases, while one or none permeable vessel was found in 23 (16%) limbs. Results: Inasmuch surgical approach was successful in all cases, the endovascular stage was technically profitable in 134 (93%) cases. The ABI posto-peratively improved (>1.5) in 73% of cases, while clinical presentation gained at least one Rutherford category in 89% limbs. The mean hospital stay was 6.1 days (3-12 days) whereas the 30-day * Corresponding author. V.-A. Alexandrescu et al. 32 mortality rate in this homogeneous "high-risk" group of patients was 3.2%. Global risk factors alike age (>70 years/p = 0.0005), smoking (p = 0.0170) and female gender (p = 0.0111), together with CTOs length (>15 cm/p = 0.0470), severe calcifications (p = 0.0001), poor tibial runoff (p = 0.0001), TASC "C" and "D" lesions (p = 0.360 and p = 0.0394), the stent number (n = 3) and length (>6 cm) (p = 0.0039 and p = 0.0003) and the initial ABI scoring (p = 0.0051) showed statistical negative influence on primary patency. Conclusion: Hybrid infrainguinal revascularization may afford useful results in selected ASA "high risk" patients, owning low invasiveness, reproducibility and acceptable patency in return to punctual postoperative surveillance.

No abstract