Delay Tolerant Networks (DTN) are networks of self-organizing wireless nodes, where end-to-end connectivity is intermittent. In these networks, forwarding decisions are generally made using locally collected knowledge about node behavior (e.g., past contacts between nodes) to predict future contact opportunities. The use of complex network analysis has been recently suggested to perform this prediction task and improve the performance of DTN routing. Contacts seen in the past are aggregated to a social graph, and a variety of metrics (e.g., centrality and similarity) or algorithms (e.g., community detection) have been proposed to assess the utility of a node to deliver a content or bring it closer to the destination.In this paper, we argue that it is not so much the choice or sophistication of social metrics and algorithms that bears the most weight on performance, but rather the mapping from the mobility process generating contacts to the aggregated social graph. We first study two well-known DTN routing algorithms -SimBet and BubbleRap -that rely on such complex network analysis, and show that their performance heavily depends on how the mapping (contact aggregation) is performed. What is more, for a range of synthetic mobility models and real traces, we show that improved performances (up to a factor of 4 in terms of delivery ratio) are consistently achieved for a relatively narrow range of aggregation levels only, where the aggregated graph most closely reflects the underlying mobility structure. To this end, we propose an online algorithm that uses concepts from unsupervised learning and spectral graph theory to infer this "correct" graph structure; this algorithm allows each node to locally identify and adjust to the optimal operating point, and achieves good performance in all scenarios considered.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Abstract-Assessing mobility in a thorough fashion is a crucial step toward more efficient mobile network design. Recent research on mobility has focused on two main points: analyzing models and studying their impact on data transport. These works investigate the consequences of mobility. In this paper, instead, we focus on the causes of mobility. Starting from established research in sociology, we propose SIMPS, a mobility model of human crowd motion. This model defines two complimentary behaviors, namely socialize and isolate, that regulate an individual with regard to her/his own sociability level. SIMPS leads to results that agree with scaling laws observed both in small-scale and large-scale human motion. Although our model defines only two simple individual behaviors, we observe many emerging collective behaviors (group formation/splitting, path formation, and evolution). To our knowledge, SIMPS is the first model in the networking community that tackles the roots governing mobility.

No abstract

No abstract

Vehicular ad-hoc networks with inter-vehicular communications are a prospective technology which contributes to safer and more efficient roads and offers information and entertainment services to mobile users. Since large real-world testbeds are not feasible, research on vehicular ad-hoc networks depends mainly on simulations. Therefore, it is crucial that realistic mobility models are employed. We propose a generic and modular mobility simulation framework (GMSF). GMSF simplifies the design of new mobility models and their evaluation. Besides, new functionalities can be easily added. GMSF also propose new vehicular mobility models, GIS-based mobility models. These models are based on highly detailed road maps from a geographic information system (GIS) and realistic microscopic behaviors (car-following and traffic lights management). We perform an extensive comparison of our new GIS-based mobility models with popular mobility models (Random Waypoint, Manhattan) and realistic vehicular traces from a proprietary traffic simulator. Our findings leverages important issues the networking community still has to address.