Tightly coordinated grip force adaptations in response to changing load forces have been reported as continuous, stable, and proportional to the load force changes. Considering the existence of inherent sensorimotor feedback delays, current accounts of grip force-load force coupling invoke explicit predictive mechanisms in the form of internal models for feedforward control to account for anticipatory grip force modulations. However, recent findings suggest that the stability and regularity of grip force-load force coupling is less persistent than previously thought. Thus, the objective of the current study was to comprehensively quantify the time-varying characteristics of grip force-load force coupling. Investigations into the coupling's dynamics during continuous 30 s bouts of load force oscillation revealed intermittent phases of coordination, as well as phases that varied in stability, rather than a persistent and continuously stable pattern of coordination. These findings have important implications for accounts of grip force-load force coupling and of anticipation in motor control, more broadly.

No abstract

Paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation (PCMS) has been used to enhance corticospinal excitability and functional outcomes in humans with spinal cord injury (SCI). Here, we examined the effect of increasing the number of paired-pulses on PCMS-induced plasticity. During PCMS, corticospinal volleys evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the hand motor cortex were timed to arrive at corticospinal-motoneuronal synapses of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle ~1-2 ms before the arrival of antidromic potentials elicited in motoneurons by electrical stimulation of the ulnar nerve. We tested motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by TMS over the hand motor cortex and electrical stimulation at the cervicomedullary junction (CMEPs) in the FDI muscle before and after 180 paired-pulses (PCMS-180) followed-up by another 180 paired-pulses (PCMS-360) in humans with and without chronic cervical SCI. The nine-hole-peg-test (9HPT) was measured before and after paired-pulses in individuals with SCI. We found that the size of MEPs and CMEPs increased to a similar extent after PCMS-180 in both groups compared with baseline and further increased after PCMS-360 in SCI participants, suggesting a spinal origin for these effects. Notably, in people with SCI, the time to complete the 9HPT decreased after PCMS-180 and further decreased after PCMS-360 compared with baseline but not when the 9HPT was repeated overtime. Our findings demonstrate that increasing the number of PCMS paired-pulses potentiates corticospinal excitability and voluntary motor output after SCI, likely through spinal plasticity. This proof-of-principle study suggests that increasing the PCMS dose represents a strategy to boost voluntary motor output after SCI.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Feedforward internal model-based control enabled by efference copies of motor commands is the prevailing theoretical account of motor anticipation. Grip force control during object manipulation-a paradigmatic example of motor anticipation-is a key line of evidence for that account. However, the internal model approach has not addressed the computational challenges faced by the act of manipulating mechanically complex objects with nonlinear, underactuated degrees of freedom. These objects exhibit complex and unpredictable load force dynamics which cannot be encoded by efference copies of underlying motor commands, leading to the prediction from the perspective of an efference copy-enabled feedforward control scheme that grip force should either lag or fail to coordinate with changes in load force. In contrast to that prediction, we found evidence for strong, precise, anticipatory grip force control during manipulations of a complex object. The results are therefore inconsistent with the internal forward model approach and suggest that efference copies of motor commands are not necessary to enable anticipatory control during active object manipulation.

The grip force applied to maintain grasp of a handheld object has been typically reported as tightly coupled to the load force exerted by the object as it is actively manipulated, occurring proportionally and consistently in phase with changes in load force. However, continuous grip force-load force coupling breaks down when overall load force levels and oscillation amplitudes are lower (Grover F, Lamb M, Bonnette S, Silva PL, Lorenz T, Riley MA. Exp Brain Res 236: 2531–2544, 2018) or more predictable (Grover FM, Nalepka P, Silva PL, Lorenz T, Riley MA. Exp Brain Res 237: 687–703, 2019). Under these circumstances, grip force is instead only intermittently coupled to load force; continuous coupling is prompted only when load force levels or variations become sufficiently high or unpredictable. The current study investigated the nature of the transition between continuous and intermittent modes of grip force control by scaling the load force level and the oscillation amplitude continuously in time by means of scaling the required frequency of movement oscillations. Participants grasped a cylindrical object between the thumb and forefinger and oscillated their arm about the shoulder in the sagittal plane. Oscillation frequencies were paced with a metronome that scaled through an ascending or descending frequency progression. Due to greater accelerations, faster frequencies produced greater overall load force levels and more pronounced load oscillations. We observed smooth but nonlinear transitions between clear regimes of intermittent and continuous grip force-load force coordination, for both scaling directions, indicating that grip force control can flexibly reorganize as parameters affecting grasp (e.g., variations in load force) change over time. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Grip force (GF) is synchronously coupled to changing load forces (LF) during object manipulation when LF levels are high or unpredictable, but only intermittently coupled to LF during less challenging grasp conditions. This study characterized the nature of transitions between synchronous and intermittent GF-LF coupling, revealing a smooth but nonlinear change in intermittent GF modulation in response to continuous scaling of LF amplitude. Intermittent, “drift-and-act” control may provide an alternative framework for understanding GF-LF coupling.