The objective of the study is to describe safety and effects of protein C concentrate (PCConc) administration in neonates with sepsis-induced coagulopathy. Eighteen neonates (12 preterm and 6 full term) aged between 1 and 28 days who have severe sepsis (n = 6) or septic shock (n = 12), with coagulopathy and acquired protein C (PC) deficiency received PCConc (i.v. bolus of 100 IU/kg, followed by 50 IU/kg every 6 h for 72 h). Platelet counts, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen, D-dimer, C-reactive protein (CRP), antithrombin (AT), PC, CRP, and neonatal therapeutic intervention scoring system (NTISS) were assessed before and 24, 48, and 72 h after the study entry. According to Clinical Risk Index for Babies II score (CRIB II score), the expected mortality in preterms was 10%. After 24 h of treatment, PC activity levels increased from an average of 19% to 57%, and they were within normal limits before the last PCConc bolus. During the treatment period, a shortening of PT (P = 0.04) and activated partial thromboplastin time (P = 0.02), and an increase in antithrombin levels (P < 0.0001) were observed, along with a reduction in CRP (P = 0.005) and NTISS values (P = 0.003). No adverse events were observed. This pilot study shows that in neonatal severe sepsis, normalization of PC levels is safe and probably effective in modulating the inflammatory response and in controlling coagulopathy. However, for the potential beneficial effects of PCConc administration on morbidity and mortality, a placebo-controlled, double-blind study is required.
Background
Despite current advances in liver transplant surgery, post-operative early allograft dysfunction still complicates the patient prognosis and graft survival. The transition from the donor has not been yet fully understood, and no study quantifies if and how the liver function changes through its transfer to the recipient. The indocyanine green dye plasma disappearance rate (ICG-PDR) is a simple validated tool of liver function assessment. The variation rate between the donor and recipient ICG-PDR still needs to be investigated.
Materials and methods
Single-center retrospective study. ICG-PDR determinations were performed before graft retrieval (T1) and 24 hours after transplant (T2). The ICG-PDR relative variation rate between T1 and T2 was calculated to assess the graft function and suffering/recovering. Matched data were compared with the MEAF model of graft dysfunction.
Objective
To investigate whether the variation rate between the donor ICG-PDR value and the recipient ICG-PDR measurement on first postoperative day (POD1) can be associated with the MEAF score.
Results
36 ICG-PDR measurements between 18 donors and 18 graft recipients were performed. The mean donor ICG-PDR was 22.64 (SD 6.35), and the mean receiver’s ICG-PDR on 1st POD was 17.68 (SD 6.60), with a mean MEAF value of 4.51 (SD 1.23). Pearson’s test stressed a good, linear inverse correlation between the ICG-PDR relative variation and the MEAF values, correlation coefficient -0.580 (p = 0.012).
Conclusion
The direct correlation between the donor to recipient ICG-PDR variation rate and MEAF was found. Measurements at T1 and T2 showed an up- or downtrend of the graft performance that reflect the MEAF values.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.