Most models of tumorigenesis assume that tumors are monoclonal in origin. This conclusion is based largely on studies using X chromosome-linked markers in females. One important factor, often ignored in such studies, is the distribution of X-inactivated cells in tissues. Because lyonization occurs early in development, many of the progeny of a single embryonic stem cell are grouped together in the adult, forming patches. As polyclonality can be demonstrated only at the borders of X-inactivation patches, the patch size is crucial in determining the chance of demonstrating polyclonality and hence the number of tumors that need to be examined to exclude polyclonality. Previously studies using Xlinked genes such as glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase have been handicapped by the need to destroy the tissues to study the haplotypes of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase [Fialkow, P.-J.
Detection of CMCs in peripheral blood samples at the time of MM diagnosis by semiquantitative RT-PCR does not add any significant predictive value to the stage of disease. Thus, this approach should not be used in clinical practice, and further studies are required to determine its usefulness.
Allelic deletions, which are suggestive for the presence of tumor suppressor genes, represent a common event in endometrial cancer (EC). Previous loss-of-heterozygosity studies for human chromosome 10q identified a candidate deletion interval at 10q25-q26, which we further narrowed to a 160-kb region at 10q26, bounded by markers D10S1236 and WIAF3299. Using a positional candidate approach, we identified three alternative transcripts of a novel human gene, CASC2 (cancer susceptibility candidate 2; formely C10orf5). One of such transcripts, CASC2a, encodes a short protein of 102 amino acids with no similarity to any other known gene product. Three (7%) CASC2a mutations were identified in tumor DNA from 44 EC patients. While c.-156G>T and c.22C>T (p.Pro8Ser) are sequence variants with unknown functional significance, c.84delA is a mutation with a truncation effect on the predicted protein (p. Asn28fsX50). Expression studies by real-time RT-PCR on several normal and tumor cells revealed that CASC2a mRNA is downregulated in cancer, suggesting that it may act as a potential tumor suppressor gene. The very low mutation rate seems to also indicate that inactivation of CASC2a might probably be due to mechanisms different from genetic alterations.
BackgroundActivation of oncogenes downstream the EGFR gene contributes to colorectal tumorigenesis and determines the sensitivity to anti-EGFR treatments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS and PIK3CA mutations in a large collection of CRC patients from genetically-homogeneous Sardinian population.MethodsA total of 1284 Sardinian patients with histologically-proven diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and presenting with metastatic disease were included into the study. Genomic DNA was isolated from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary tumour tissue samples of CRC patients and screened for mutations in RAS and BRAF genes, using pyrosequencing assays, and in PIK3CA gene, using automated DNA sequencing assays.ResultsOverall, mutation rates were 35.6 % for KRAS, 4.1 % for NRAS, and 2.1 % for BRAF. Among available DNA samples, 114/796 (14.3 %) primary CRCs were found to carry a mutation in the PIK3CA gene. In this subset of patients analysed in all four genes, a pathogenetic mutation of at least one gene was discovered in about half (378/796; 47.5 %) of CRC cases. A mutated BRAF gene was found to steadily act as a negative prognostic factor for either time to progression as metastatic disease (from detection of primary CRC to diagnosis of first distant metastasis; p = 0.009) or partial survival (from diagnosis of advanced disease to the time of death or last control; p = 0.006) or overall survival (p < 0.001). No significant impact on prognosis was observed for mutated KRAS, NRAS, and PIK3CA genes or combined RAS mutations (all RAS).ConclusionsOur study defines both prevalence and prognostic role of main activated oncogenes in a population-based large collection of CRC patients.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12967-016-1053-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The treatment of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) is considered by most authors as unrewarding, and the disease progresses to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We studied the effectiveness of a new immunosuppressive (IS) regimen by analyzing the rates of remission, relapse and progression to ESRD in 19 patients with MPGN. The treatment consisted of 4 phases: (1) induction with intravenous boluses of methylprednisolone plus cyclophosphamide (CPM) orally; (2) maintenance with oral prednisone (PDN) in an alternateday regimen and CPM in a daily oral dose; (3) tapering during which PDN alone was slowly decreased; (4) discontinuation when CPM was omitted and PDN slowly withdrawn according to the steroid withdrawal schedule. At the end of the treatment that lasted on average 10 ± 1 months, 15 patients remitted, 3 improved and 1 progressed. There were 8 relapses in 6 patients: 4 in 3 patients were treated with repeat cycles and remitted completely. Four patients who had relapsed after 4, 8,11 and 13 years of remission refused retreatment and progressed rapidly to ESRD. All patients treated and retreated after relapsing had remissions, while renal failure and disease progression occurred in 1 patient only. Plasma creatinine averaged, in the whole group, 165 ± 26 before, 156 ± 30 after treatment and 224 ± 57 μM/1 at the end of 7.4 ± 0.8 years of follow-up. An intensive IS regimen combining steroids and alkylating agents in high doses and for a prolonged time is effective in inducing remission and halting progression to ESRD in patients with MPGN.
Cutaneous malignant melanoma, whose incidence is increasing steadily worldwide, is the result of complex interactions between individual genetic factors and environmental risk factors. Ultraviolet radiation represents the most important environmental risk factor for the development of skin cancers, including melanoma. Sun exposure and early sunburn during childhood are the principal causes of cutaneous melanoma insurgence in adults, with double the risk relative to a nonexposed population. Consequently, ultraviolet protection has long been recognized as an important measure to prevent such a malignancy. Biological and epidemiological data suggest that vitamin D status could affect the risk of cancer and play a role in cancer prevention by exerting antiproliferative effects. Solar radiations are critical for vitamin D synthesis in humans; however, uncontrolled and intensive sun exposure is dangerous to skin health and may contribute toward the development of cutaneous malignant melanoma. An optimum balance between sun protection and exposure is thus advocated. Additional research is required to confirm the preventive role of vitamin D in melanoma incidence or a positive influence on patient outcome.
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women, with an incidence that varies between 40 and 90 per 100 000 (standardized rate) worldwide. Breast cancer is the most frequent female tumour in Italy, representing about 25% of all female tumours as reported in Italian registries (Zanetti et al, 1997).A positive family history is known to be a high risk factor for developing the disease: 5-10% of all breast cancers arise in individuals carrying a germline mutation and are usually considered hereditary forms (Claus et al, 1991). Two major breast cancersusceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, have been cloned (Miki et al, 1994;Wooster et al, 1995) and both are thought to account for 30-60% of hereditary breast cancer (Serova et al, 1997;Szabo et al, 1997;Vehmanen et al, 1997aVehmanen et al, , 1997b. However, large-scale mutation analyses conducted in several populations suggest the existence of additional breast cancer-susceptibility gene(s). BRCA1 mutations are responsible for the majority of familial breast cancer associated with ovarian carcinoma, for about 50% of cases with breast cancer alone and for very few male breast cancer cases (Easton et al, 1993;Stratton et al, 1994;Narod et al, 1995). It has been estimated that women carrying a germline mutation in BRCA1 have a risk ranging from 80 to 90% for developing breast cancer and from 44 to 63% for developing ovarian cancer (Easton et al, 1993(Easton et al, , 1995Ford et al, 1994; Miki et al, 1994;Wooster et al, 1994). BRCA2 mutations account for a similar proportion of inherited breast cancer and are frequently associated with male breast cancer (Wooster et al, 1995). Breast cancer risk in females carrying BRCA2 mutations is calculated to be similar to that conferred by BRCA1 mutations (Easton et al, 1993Ford et al, 1994; Miki et al, 1994;Wooster et al, 1994). BRCA1 and particularly BRCA2 families are often affected by other tumours such as prostate, liver, pancreas, lung, stomach and colorectum (Wooster et al, 1995;Gudmundsson et al, 1996;Phelan et al, 1996;Thorlacius et al, 1996;Vehmanen et al, 1997b;Tonin et al, 1998). Except for higher incidences of ovarian cancer in families with mutations in a 3.3-kb region of exon 11 of BRCA2 (the so-called ovarian cancer cluster region [OCCR]; Gayther et al, 1997), no other significant association between genotype and phenotype was described. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are for the most part frame-shifts due to small deletions leading to premature translation termination (Wooster et al, 1995;Phelan et al, 1996;Tavtigian et al, 1996;Gayther et al, 1997).Some of these mutations are prevalent in genetically homogeneous populations as a consequence of a founder effect. A single BRCA2 mutation accounts for the majority of hereditary breast cancer in Iceland Thorlacius et al, 1996) and for 40% of male breast cancer cases , whereas three different founder mutations (185delAG and 5382insC in BRCA1, and 6174delT in BRCA2) have a high frequency in Ashkenazi Jews (Roa et al, 1996). Although at different rates, BRCA1 and BRCA2 f...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.