ObjectiveTo systematically review the procedure, applications, and outcomes of autologous fat grafting, a promising technique with various clinical applications.Patients and methodsLiterature review of publications concerning autologous fat grafting.ResultsSince its introduction, lipofilling has become increasingly popular; however, its results are variable and unpredictable. Several modifications have been made to the procedures of fat harvesting, processing, and injecting. Surgical excision and low negative-pressure aspiration with large-bore cannulas minimize adipocyte damage during fat harvesting. The “wet” method of fat harvesting involves fluid injection at the donor site and facilitates lipoaspiration while minimizing pain and ecchymosis. For fat processing, centrifugation at a low speed is preferable to high-speed centrifugation, gravity separation or filtration. Fat injection at the recipient site should be performed using small-gauge cannulas in a fanning out pattern over multiple sessions, rather than a single session. Fat grafts exhibit not only dermal filler properties but also regenerative potential owing to the presence of stem cells in fat tissue. Thus, the clinical applications of autologous fat grafting include correction of secondary contour defects after breast reconstruction, release of painful scar contractures, and treatment of burn scars and radiodermatitis. Lipofilling is also used in aesthetic surgery, such as facial and hand rejuvenation, augmentation rhinoplasty, and breast and gluteal augmentation. The complications of lipofilling are minimal and include bruising, swelling, pain, infection, necrosis, and calcification.ConclusionsLipofilling is a low-risk procedure that can be used to correct soft-tissue defects in the face, trunk, and extremities, with minimal discomfort for patients.

IntroductionThe use of autologous fat transplantation to correct volume and contour defects, scars, and asymmetry after breast cancer surgery has increased over the past 20 years. Many developments and refinements in this technique have taken place in recent years, and several studies of the safety of lipofilling in the breast have been published.Presentation of caseWe performed a literature review of this technique, highlighting the crucial role of lipofilling in breast cancer reconstruction.DiscussionThe efficacy of the fat graft transplantation depends on the experience and the technique used by the surgeon. The ASCs (adipose-derived stem cells) contained in the fat graft has proven to be crucial for breast reconstruction by mean the regeneration of tissue, through the chemotactic, paracrine, and immunomodulatory activities and their in situ differentiation.ConclusionThe role of lipofilling for breast reconstruction could be more significant with the application of the findings of experimental research on tissue engineering and ASCs.

Worldwide, hard-to-heal lower limb wounds are estimated to affect 1.5–3% of the adult population with a treatment-related annual cost of $10 billion. Thus, chronic skin ulcers of the lower limb are a matter of economic and public concern. Over the years, multiple medical and surgical approaches have been proposed but they are still inadequate, and no effective therapy yet exists. Regenerative medicine and stem cell-based therapies hold great promise for wound healing. Recently, many plastic surgeons have studied the potential clinical application of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), which are a readily available adult stem cell population that can undergo multilineage differentiation and secrete growth factors that can enhance wound-healing processes by promoting angiogenesis, and hence increase local blood supply. ASCs have been widely studied in vitro and in vivo in animal models. However, there are few randomized clinical trials on humans, and these are still ongoing or recruiting patients. Moreover, there is no consensus on a common isolation protocol that is clinically feasible and which would ensure reproducible results. The authors aim to provide readers with an overview of the biological properties of ASCs as well as their clinical application, to help better understanding of present and future strategies for the treatment of hard-to-heal wounds by means of stem cell-based therapies.

BackgroundAdipose-derived stem cells are recognized as being an effective mesenchymal stem cell population with enormous potential in different fields of regenerative medicine and stem cell therapy. Although there is unanimous agreement on the harvesting procedure for adipose tissue, there are various protocols for adipose-derived stem cell isolation. The aim of this study was compare two methods of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) isolation, one based on a mechanical + enzymatic (ME) procedure and the other one exclusively mechanical (MC), in order to determine which one was superior to the other in accordance with current European and US legislation.MethodsWe reported step by step the two different methods ASCs isolation by comparing them. The ME procedure included the use of a centrifuge, an incubator and collagenase digestion solution (Collagenase NB 6 GMP Grade 17458; Serva GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). The MC procedure was performed by vibrating shaker and centrifuge, both placed in a laminar airflow bench.ResultsWith the ME procedure, a mean of 9.06 × 105 ASCs (range, 8.4 to 9.72 × 105; SD ± 6.6 × 105) was collected, corresponding to 25.9% of the total number of harvested cells. With the MC procedure, a mean of 5 × 105 ASCs (range: 4.0 to 6.0 × 105; SD, ±1 × 105) was collected, corresponding to 5% of the total number of harvested cells.ConclusionBased on data collected, from the same amount of lipoaspirate the ME procedure allowed to isolate a greater number of ASCs (25,9%) compared to the MC one (5%).

One important modality of breast cancer therapy is surgical treatment, which has become increasingly less mutilating over the last century. Breast reconstruction has become an integrated part of breast cancer treatment due to long-term psychosexual health factors and its importance for breast cancer survivors. Both autogenous tissue-based and implant-based reconstruction provides satisfactory reconstructive options due to better surgeon awareness of “the ideal breast size”, although each has its own advantages and disadvantages. An overview of the current options in breast reconstruction is presented in this article.