An increasing number of hip prostheses feature double head-neck and neck-stem modularities. One possible complication is loosening of the neck-stem coupling. Current surgical technique includes application of hammer blows to the proximal end of the neck-stem coupling. This could compromise the cleanness of the head-neck modularity and damage the bearing surfaces. The goal of this work was to assess whether such hammer blows are really necessary to avoid neck-stem disassembly during in vivo service. Commercially available hip stems featuring neck-stem modularity were tested. Extraction force was measured in vitro when different levels of press fitting were simulated (manual assembly followed by various combinations of simulated loads) to assess critical conditions in relation to surgical technique and applied loads. The disassembly force after manual insertion followed by the first small postoperative loads imposed by the patient during walking was as high as that obtained with hammer blows. Thus, application of hammer blows to fix the neck-stem coupling seemed unnecessary.
There is renewed interest in resurfacing hip prostheses. While stemmed prostheses have been extensively studied in the past, little is known about the biomechanics of epiphyseal prostheses. Our aim was to develop a combined experimental-numerical tool to study the intact and operated epiphysis. Bone and implant stress, relative micromotion and failure mode in the intact and implanted bone were investigated. Twelve pairs of cadaver human femurs were studied intact, to fully characterize the proximal epiphysis. Four were then implanted with a commercial resurfacing prosthesis. They were tested in the elastic range, while strains were measured with 15 rosettes. Implant micromotions were measured in the operated condition. A total of 7 loading scenarios were simulated to cover the range of typical motor tasks. Additionally, Finite Element (FE) models were built using a validated procedure for assigning inhomogeneous material properties based on CT data. To allow extensive validation of the FE model, additional measurements were taken in vitro: bone deflection in various points, indirect measurement of load application point, digitizing of the bone surface and gauge locations. The FE models were also used to identify the most critical load scenario to recreate in vitro spontaneous head-neck fractures. Strain measurements were successfully obtained in intact and implanted femurs, providing the natural strain pattern, and indicating moderate stress-shielding in the operated condition. Results on the 6 femurs that were modeled showed that FE can predict overall displacements with an accuracy of 0.4mm, and principal stress with an accuracy of 10% (Root Mean Squared, RMSE). In vitro failure tests were successful: all specimens fractured, with a variety of failures ranging from sub-capital to trans-trochanteric. This confirms the suitability of this test model to replicate spontaneous fractures in elderly subjects. In conclusion, an experimentally validated FE method was developed, that run in parallel with an optimized in vitro simulation. These tools can successfully predict the stress distribution and the failure mode in the proximal femur both in its natural condition and with a resurfacing prosthesis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.