Molecular control of the pluripotent state is thought to reside in a core circuitry of master transcription factors including the homeodomain-containing protein Nanog1–2, which plays an essential role in establishing ground state pluripotency during somatic cell reprogramming3–4. While the genomic occupancy of Nanog has been extensively investigated, comparatively little is known about Nanog-associated proteins5 and their contribution to the Nanog-mediated reprogramming process. Using enhanced purification techniques and a stringent computational algorithm, we identified 27 high-confidence protein interaction partners of Nanog in mouse ES cells. These consist of 19 novel partners of Nanog that have not been reported before including the Ten eleven translocation (Tet) family methylcytosine hydroxylase Tet1. We confirmed physical association of Nanog with Tet1, and demonstrated that Tet1, in synergy with Nanog, enhances the efficiency of reprogramming. We also found physical association and reprogramming synergy of Tet2 with Nanog, and demonstrated that knockdown of Tet2 abolishes the reprogramming synergy of Nanog with a catalytically deficient mutant of Tet1 (Tet1Mut). These results indicate that the physical interaction between Nanog and Tet1/2 proteins facilitates reprogramming in a manner that is dependent on Tet1/2's catalytic activity. Tet1 and Nanog co-occupy genomic loci of genes associated with both maintenance of pluripotency and lineage commitment in ES cells, and Tet1 binding is reduced upon Nanog depletion. Co-expression of Nanog and Tet1 results in expression priming of and increased 5hmC levels at top ranked common targets Esrrb and Oct4 before reprogramming to naïve pluripotency. We propose that Tet1 is recruited by Nanog to enhance the expression of a subset of key reprogramming target genes. These results provide an insight into the reprogramming mechanism of Nanog and uncover a novel role for 5mC hydroxylases in the establishment of naïve pluripotency.

Eukaryotic GCN5 acetyltransferases influence diverse biological processes by acetylating histones and non-histone proteins and regulating chromatin and gene-specific transcription as part of multiprotein complexes. In lower eukaryotes and invertebrates, these complexes include the yeast ADA complex that is still incompletely understood; the SAGA (Spt-Ada-Gcn5 acetylase) complexes from yeast to Drosophila that are mostly coactivators; and the ATAC (Ada Two-A containing) complex, only known in Drosophila and still poorly characterized. In contrast, vertebrate organisms, express two paralogous GCN5-like acetyltransferases (GCN5 and PCAF), which have been found so far only in SAGA-type complexes referred to hereafter as the STAGA (SPT3-TAF9-GCN5/PCAF acetylase) complexes. We now report the purification and characterization of vertebrate (human) ATAC-type complexes and identify novel components of STAGA. We show that human ATAC complexes incorporate in addition to GCN5 or PCAF (GCN5/PCAF), other epigenetic coregulators (ADA2-A, ADA3, STAF36, and WDR5), cofactors of chromatin assembly/remodeling and DNA replication machineries (POLE3/CHRAC17 and POLE4), the stress-and TGF␤-activated protein kinase (TAK1/MAP3K7) and MAP3-kinase regulator (MBIP), additional cofactors of unknown function, and a novel YEATS2-NC2␤ histone fold module that interacts with the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and negatively regulates transcription when recruited to a promoter. We further identify the p38 kinase-interacting protein (p38IP/ FAM48A) as a novel component of STAGA with distant similarity to yeast Spt20. These results suggest that vertebrate ATACtype and STAGA-type complexes link specific extracellular signals to modification of chromatin structure and regulation of the basal transcription machinery.Epigenetic information carried in the form of histone posttranslational modifications (or "marks") is essential for the proper expression, maintenance, and replication of eukaryotic genomes. These covalent modifications are deposited (or removed) by a variety of enzymes that are often part of large multiprotein "coregulator" complexes. These complexes are targeted to specific chromosomal loci by DNA-binding regulators and/or via direct docking to predeposited epigenetic marks (1

The c-Myc oncoprotein (Myc) controls cell fate by regulating gene transcription in association with a DNA-binding partner, Max. While Max lacks a transcription regulatory domain, the N terminus of Myc contains a transcription activation domain (TAD) that recruits cofactor complexes containing the histone acetyltransferases (HATs) GCN5 and Tip60. Here, we report a novel functional interaction between Myc TAD and the p300 coactivator-acetyltransferase. We show that p300 associates with Myc in mammalian cells and in vitro through direct interactions with Myc TAD residues 1 to 110 and acetylates Myc in a TAD-dependent manner in vivo at several lysine residues located between the TAD and DNA-binding domain. Moreover, the Myc:Max complex is differentially acetylated by p300 and GCN5 and is not acetylated by Tip60 in vitro, suggesting distinct functions for these acetyltransferases. Whereas p300 and CBP can stabilize Myc independently of acetylation, p300-mediated acetylation results in increased Myc turnover. In addition, p300 functions as a coactivator that is recruited by Myc to the promoter of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase gene, and p300/CBP stimulates Myc TAD-dependent transcription in a HAT domain-dependent manner. Our results suggest dual roles for p300/CBP in Myc regulation: as a Myc coactivator that stabilizes Myc and as an inducer of Myc instability via direct Myc acetylation.The c-Myc oncoprotein (Myc) is the ubiquitous member of a small family of highly related DNA-binding transcription factors (including L-Myc and N-Myc) that regulate a wide variety of genes involved in the control of cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptotic cell death. Myc is essential for embryonic development and both Myc expression and activity are tightly regulated by mitogens and other physiological stimuli in normal somatic cells. Notably, unregulated Myc expression is tumorigenic in mice and has been associated with most types of cancer in humans. Myc binds to E-box DNA elements having the core consensus sequence CACGTG as a heterodimer with an obligatory partner protein called Max. Myc and Max dimerize and bind DNA via their respective basic-helix-loop-helix-leucine zipper (bHLHZip) domains. While Max does not have a transcription regulatory domain, Myc has a phylogenetically conserved N-terminal transcription activation domain (TAD) that is also essential for oncogenic cellular transformation (reviewed in reference 10).Several proteins have been shown to interact with Myc N-terminal TAD and are potential regulators or mediators of Myc transactivating and transforming activities (10,30). Among these, the TRRAP protein has been shown to contribute to the transformation activity of Myc through interactions with the conserved Myc box 1 (MB1) and MB2 regions within the TAD (23) and is a subunit of various transcription regulatory cofactors complexes that have histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity. These TRRAP-HAT complexes include the GCN5 HAT-containing complexes STAGA (21, 22) and TFTC (3), the rela...

Oct4 is a well-known transcription factor that plays fundamental roles in stem cell self-renewal, pluripotency, and somatic cell reprogramming. However, limited information is available on Oct4-associated protein complexes and their intrinsic protein-protein interactions that dictate Oct4’s critical regulatory activities. Here we employed an improved affinity purification approach combined with mass spectrometry to purify Oct4 protein complexes in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), and discovered many novel Oct4 partners important for self-renewal and pluripotency of mESCs. Notably, we found that Oct4 is associated with multiple chromatin modifying complexes with documented as well as newly proved functional significance in stem cell maintenance and somatic cell reprogramming. Our study establishes a solid biochemical basis for genetic and epigenetic regulation of stem cell pluripotency and provides a framework for exploring alternative factor-based reprogramming strategies.

Ten-eleven translocation (TET) proteins play key roles in regulating the methylation status of DNA through oxidizing methylcytosines (5mC), generating 5-hydroxymethylcytosines (5hmC) that can both serve as stable epigenetic marks and participate in active demethylation. Unlike the other TET-family members, TET2 does not contain a DNA-binding domain, and it remains unclear how it is recruited to chromatin. Here we show that TET2 is recruited by the RNA-binding protein Paraspeckle component 1 (PSPC1) through transcriptionally active loci, including endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) whose long terminal repeats (LTRs) have been co-opted by mammalian genomes as stage- and tissue-specific transcriptional regulatory modules. We find that PSPC1 and TET2 contribute to ERVL and ERVL-associated gene regulation by both transcriptional repression via histone deacetylases and posttranscriptional destabilization of RNAs through 5hmC modification. Our findings provide evidence for a functional role of transcriptionally active ERVs as specific docking sites for RNA epigenetic modulation and gene regulation.

The homeodomain transcription factor Nanog plays an important role in embryonic stem cell (ESC) self-renewal and is essential for acquiring ground-state pluripotency during reprogramming. Understanding how Nanog is transcriptionally regulated is important for further dissecting mechanisms of ESC pluripotency and somatic cell reprogramming. Here, we report that Nanog is subjected to a negative autoregulatory mechanism, i.e., autorepression, in ESCs, and that such autorepression requires the coordinated action of the Nanog partner and transcriptional repressor Zfp281. Mechanistically, Zfp281 recruits the NuRD repressor complex onto the Nanog locus and maintains its integrity to mediate Nanog autorepression and, functionally, Zfp281-mediated Nanog autorepression presents a roadblock to efficient somatic cell reprogramming. Our results identify a unique transcriptional regulatory mode of Nanog gene expression and shed light into the mechanistic understanding of Nanog function in pluripotency and reprogramming.

SUMMARY Super-enhancers (SEs) are large clusters of transcriptional enhancers that are co-occupied by multiple lineage specific transcription factors driving expression of genes that define cell identity. In embryonic stem cells (ESCs), SEs are highly enriched for the core pluripotency factors Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog. In this study, we sought to dissect the molecular control mechanism of SE activity in pluripotency and reprogramming. Starting from a protein interaction network surrounding Sox2, we identified Tex10 as a key pluripotency factor that plays a functionally significant role in ESC self-renewal, early embryo development, and reprogramming. Tex10 is enriched at SEs in a Sox2-dependent manner and coordinates histone acetylation and DNA demethylation at SEs. Tex10 activity is also important for pluripotency and reprogramming in human cells. Our study therefore highlights Tex10 as a core component of the pluripotency network and sheds light on its role in epigenetic control of SE activity for cell fate determination.

Pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) hold great promise for future use in tissue replacement therapies due to their ability to self-renew indefinitely and to differentiate into all adult cell types. Harnessing this therapeutic potential efficiently requires a much deeper understanding of the molecular processes at work within the pluripotency network. The transcription factors Nanog, Oct4, and Sox2 reside at the core of this network, where they interact and regulate their own expression as well as that of numerous other pluripotency factors. Of these core factors, Nanog is critical for blocking the differentiation of pluripotent cells, and more importantly, for establishing the pluripotent ground state during somatic cell reprogramming. Both mouse and human Nanog are able to form dimers in vivo, allowing them to preferentially interact with certain factors and perform unique functions. Recent studies have identified an evolutionary functional conservation among vertebrate Nanog orthologs from chick, zebrafish, and the axolotl salamander, adding an additional layer of complexity to Nanog function. Here we present a detailed overview of published work focusing on Nanog structure, function, dimerization, and regulation at the genetic and post-translational levels with regard to the establishment and maintenance of pluripotency. The full spectrum of Nanog function in pluripotent stem cells and in cancer is only beginning to be revealed. We therefore use this evidence to advocate for more comprehensive analysis of Nanog in the context of disease, development, and regeneration.