This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Objective: Hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm is a rare but morbid complication after liver transplantation. Treatment options include ligation and endovascular embolization, followed by revascularization. We describe a new endovascular approach by stent exclusion in a high-risk patient.Methods: A 62-year-old man who received a second liver transplant after failed allograft presented with hemobilia and was diagnosed with a hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm in the setting of infection. Given his hostile abdomen, an endovascular approach was sought. We excluded the mycotic pseudoaneurysm with multiple covered stent grafts extending from the common hepatic artery to the right and left hepatic artery. He was discharged with long-term antibiotics.Results: On the 6-month follow-up visit, the stent was patent and hepatic function was stable.Conclusions: Endovascular stent graft placement for management of hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm after liver transplantation should be considered a lower morbidity alternative to surgical repair, even in the setting of infection.
Objective: For the open treatment of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms (JRAAs), some argue for the removal of all proximal aneurysmal aorta to prevent future degeneration, whereas others deem it unnecessary. This study sought to compare perioperative and long-term outcomes of two different approaches to JRAA.Methods: Patients who underwent open JRAA repair from 2007 to 2015 at our institution were reviewed and stratified by operative technique: plication of the aneurysm cuff with graft sewn up to the renal arteries (PLI) vs a beveled anastomosis with left renal artery bypass (LRB). Patients who underwent additional mesenteric bypasses were excluded. Primary outcomes included death and decline in renal function. Univariate and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed.Results: There were 199 patients identified: 56% PLI (n ¼ 112) and 44% LRB (n ¼ 87). The majority were male (68%), white (89%), and smokers (58%). Mean age was 71.5 6 8.5 years. LRB was more likely to have chronic kidney disease (28% vs 13%; P ¼. 007) and larger preoperative proximal neck diameters (29 vs 25 mm; P < .001). LRB had longer postoperative length of stay (10.8 vs 8.3 days; P ¼ .022), longer operative times (5.4 vs 3.9 hours; P < .001), and higher operative blood loss (1.9 vs 1.6 L; P ¼ .04). Overall 30-day mortality was 2% (n ¼ 4), with no difference between cohorts. There were no differences in perioperative complications except for the development of acute kidney injury, which was more common in LRB (29% vs 14%; P ¼ .012). During 3-year follow-up, there was no difference in anastomotic aneurysmal degeneration or sac growth. In the long term, LRB was more likely to develop an occluded left renal artery (20% vs 0%; P ¼ .004) and right renal artery stenosis (29% vs 3%; P ¼ .002). However, neither group was more likely to have a decline in renal function (PLI, 23%; LRB, 25%; P ¼ .84). There was no difference in 5-year mortality (P ¼ .721).
Conclusions:The technique of removing all proximal aneurysmal aorta with a beveled anastomosis and left renal artery bypass was not protective against aneurysmal growth, nor was a difference seen in renal function decline or mortality. Furthermore, LRB led to longer length of stay and operative times with increased risk of acute kidney injury. In an era when fewer open aortic repairs are being performed, it is reasonable to consider the PLI technique in the treatment of JRAA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.