Treatment-resistant OCD remains a significant challenge to psychiatrists. To date, the most effective strategy is the addition of antipsychotics (aripiprazole and risperidone) to SRIs; another effective strategy is CBT addition to medications. Other strategies, such as the switch to another first-line treatment or the switch to intravenous administration are promising but need further confirmation in double-blind studies. The addition of medications other than antipsychotics remains to be studied, as several negative studies exist and positive ones need confirmation (only 1 positive study).
Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of involuntary admissions with regard to seasonality and clinical associated features, in a sample of patients admitted to a psychiatric unit in a period of 24 months. Methods: All subjects consecutively admitted to the Psychiatric Inpatient Unit of the San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (University of Turin, Italy) from September 2013 to August 2015 were recruited. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Results: Seven hundred and thirty admissions in psychiatric ward were recognized. The prevalence of involuntary admission was 15.4%. Patients with involuntary hospitalizations showed a higher education level, a higher prevalence of admission in spring/summer with a significant peak in June, a longer duration of hospitalization and a lower suicide ideation. Among involuntary admissions, physical restraint and suicide attempts were more prevalent during spring compared to the other seasons. Conclusions: Seasonality has an important role in the psychopathology of psychiatric disorders, particularly in bipolar and related disorder, and may represent an influencing factor in hospital admissions and hospitalizations. Seasonal pattern must be considered while managing diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders, with regard to prevention and psychoeducation of patients.
Background: Serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) and cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy (CBT) are first-line treatments for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Since response is often inadequate, in recent years researchers investigated whether combining CBT and SRIs, either ab initio or sequentially, results in a greater reduction of obsessivecompulsive symptoms. Objective: The aims of the present paper are to assess if combination treatment seems adding benefits as compared to either monotherapy alone and if sequential strategies may be effective in converting partial or non responders to a first-line treatment into responders. Method: We reviewed available literature on pharmacological and CBT combination and sequential treatments for adult and pediatric OCD patients and then we conducted a separate analysis for studies concerning these two promising strategies. Search results included openlabel trials and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Results: We identified ten controlled studies assessing the efficacy of combination treatments ab initio versus CBT alone and six evaluating combination strategies ab initio versus medications alone. Eleven studies, only two of which were RCTs, have been published on sequential treatments. The combination ab initio of CBT and SRIs has not been found to be clearly superior to either monotherapy alone in most studies conducted on this topic, except for patients with severe depression who might benefit more from the combination versus only CBT. A sequential administration of CBT after medications has been found useful in promoting remission in patients who partially responded to drugs and in promoting response in resistant patients. Conclusion: OCD patients with comorbid major depression should receive medication firstly, eventually associated with CBT; for all remaining patients there is clear evidence from the literature of no additive benefits of combining ab initio CBT and medication. Therefore, the routine use of a combination approach in all adult patients affected by OCD is not supported by the literature. The available evidence supports the effectiveness of the sequential addition of CBT to SRIs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.