This study evaluates the effects of insulin versus glibenclamide on lipoprotein metabolism at comparable levels of blood glucose control, in particular on the concentration and distribution of VLDL subfractions and lipolytic enzyme activities in nine NIDDM men (aged 56 +/- 3 years, BMI 26.5 +/- 0.9 kg/m2) (means +/- SE) participating in a crossover study. After a 3-week washout period, patients were randomly assigned to 2-month treatment periods (insulin or glibenclamide); thereafter, each patient crossed to the other treatment. At the end of each period, mean daily blood glucose (MDBG), HbA1e, plasma lipids, lipoproteins (VLDL, LDL, HDL), lipoprotein subfractions (VLDL1, 2, 3; HDL2, HDL3), and post-heparin lipase activities (lipoprotein lipase [LPL], hepatic lipase [HL]) were evaluated. Although glucose control was similar at the end of both periods (MDBG 8.3 +/- 0.3 vs. 7.9 +/- 0.3 mmol/l; HbA1c 7.4 +/- 0.3 vs. 7.0 +/- 0.2%, insulin versus glibenclamide), insulin compared with glibenclamide induced a significant reduction in plasma triglycerides (0.9 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.1 mmol/l, P < 0.05), VLDL triglycerides (50.1 +/- 12.2 vs. 63.6 +/- 12.3 mg/dl, P < 0.02), VLDL1 lipid concentration (24.9 +/- 7.5 vs. 39.9 +/- 9.5 mg/dl, P < 0.006), and increased HDL2 cholesterol (25.2 +/- 1.6 vs. 20.3 +/- 1.3 mg/dl, P < 0.03). In terms of VLDL percentage subfraction distribution, with insulin, there was a decrease in the larger subfractions (VLDL1 26.5 +/- 3.0 vs. 37.8 +/- 3.4%, P < 0.02) and an increase in the smallest (VLDL3 47.3 +/- 3.8 vs. 37.3 +/- 3.3%, P < 0.05). Moreover, HL activity was significantly lower after insulin than after glibenclamide (HL 247.2 +/- 22.3 vs. 263.5 +/- 22.6 mU/ml, P < 0.05). In conclusion, compared with glibenclamide, insulin treatment (independent of variations in glucose control) is able to decrease significantly plasma triglycerides, to increase HDL2 cholesterol, and to reduce only the concentration of the larger VLDL subfractions, with a consequent redistribution of their profile.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of sc insulin (INS) compared with sulfonylurea (SUL) therapy, at the same level of blood glucose control, on the low density lipoprotein (LDL) subfraction profile in normolipidemic type 2 diabetic patients. Nine normolipidemic type 2 diabetic men (age, 56+/-3 yr; body mass index, 26.5+/-0.9 kg/m2; mean +/- SEM), after a 3-week wash-out period, were assigned to INS or SUL for 2 months in a randomized cross-over design. Doses were adjusted only during the first month and then were kept constant. At the end of the treatments, hemoglobin A1c, plasma lipids, LDL, and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) subfraction profiles and plasma postheparin lipoprotein lipase and hepatic lipase (HL) activities were evaluated. Despite glucose control was similar at the end of both periods (hemoglobin A1c, 7.4+/-0.3% vs. 7.0+/-0.2%, INS vs. SUL), INS compared with SUL significantly reduced plasma triglyceride (0.9+/-0.1 vs. 1.1+/-0.1 mmol/L; P < 0.05). Although INS did not affect the LDL concentration, it induced a decrease in both the amount (59.0 = 9.8 vs. 76.1+/-16.8 mg/dL; P = NS) and the proportion (31.2+/-3.0% vs. 38.3+/-3.8%; P < 0.03) of small LDL. Moreover, the decrease in small LDL was positively related to the reduction of large VLDL (r = 0.67; P < 0.04) and HL (r = 0.69, P < 0.05) induced by insulin therapy. In conclusion, sc insulin therapy, independently of glucose control and even in the presence of quite low plasma triglyceride levels, is able to reduce small LDL particles in type 2 diabetic patients. This change is related to decreases in both HL activity and large VLDL particles.