Many countries have seen a two-wave pattern in reported cases of coronavirus disease-19 during the 2020 pandemic, with a first wave during spring followed by the current second wave in late summer and autumn. Empirical data show that the characteristics of the effects of the virus do vary between the two periods. Differences in age range and severity of the disease have been reported, although the comparative characteristics of the two waves still remain largely unknown. Those characteristics are compared in this study using data from two equal periods of 3 and a half months. The first period, between 15th March and 30th June, corresponding to the entire first wave, and the second, between 1st July and 15th October, corresponding to part of the second wave, still present at the time of writing this article. Two hundred and four patients were hospitalized during the first period, and 264 during the second period. Patients in the second wave were younger and the duration of hospitalization and case fatality rate were lower than those in the first wave. In the second wave, there were more children, and pregnant and post-partum women. The most frequent signs and symptoms in both waves were fever, dyspnea, pneumonia, and cough, and the most relevant comorbidities were cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and chronic neurological diseases. Patients from the second wave more frequently presented renal and gastrointestinal symptoms, were more often treated with non-invasive mechanical ventilation and corticoids, and less often with invasive mechanical ventilation, conventional oxygen therapy and anticoagulants. Several differences in mortality risk factors were also observed. These results might help to understand the characteristics of the second wave and the behaviour and danger of SARS-CoV-2 in the Mediterranean area and in Western Europe. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

No abstract

Objective. The retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) has been linked to the insulin resistance state in obesity and type 2 diabetes in animal studies. Data in humans are controversial and their relationship with organ damage in diabetic patients is lacking. We studied the association of plasma RBP4 with organ complications in type 2 diabetic patients.Setting. Sant Joan University Hospital, Reus, Spain.Subjects. 165 nonsmoker type 2 diabetic subjects according to American Diabetes Association criteria, aged 36-79 years, without proteinuria or severely decreased glomerular filtration rates (MDRD-GFR <30 mL min )1 1.73 m )2 ), were included in the study.Main outcome measure. Plasma RBP4 concentrations were the primary outcome variable. Statistics were performed in relation to clinical and subclinical arteriosclerosis, renal function parameters and biochemical data.Results. Plasma RBP4 concentrations were positively correlated with serum creatinine levels (r = 0.322, P < 0.001) and inversely correlated with MDRD-GFR (r = )0.468, P = 0.009). Patients with moderately renal dysfunction (MDRD-GFR <60 mL min )11.73 m )2 ) had higher plasma RBP4 concentrations than those with normal to mildly decreased GFR (55.3 ± 24.6 vs. 40.8 ± 15.4, P < 0.001). Patients in the top quartile of RBP4 concentrations had an increased adjusted odds ratio for moderately renal dysfunction compared with lower quartiles (4.68; 95% CI: 1.52-14.36, P = 0.007). The presence of microalbuminuria was not associated with RBP4. Plasma RBP4 concentrations were higher in those subjects with previous clinical arteriosclerosis than in event-free subjects (48.8 ± 24.2 vs. 40.6 ± 13.9, P = 0.045). The presence of retinopathy or polyneuropathy did not differ across RBP4 quartiles.Conclusions. Plasma RBP4 concentration might be a biomarker of nephropathy and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetic subjects.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of adipocyte fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4) on the lipid profile in type 2 diabetic subjects. Plasma levels of FABP4 and adiponectin and an extensive lipid profile were analyzed in 169 type 2 diabetic subjects and 105 controls. Type 2 diabetic subjects were categorized according the presence of atherogenic dyslipidemia. Univariate statistical analyses, partial correlation tests, and binary logistic regression models were applied. In type 2 diabetic subjects, FABP4 was positively correlated with plasma triglycerides (P 5 0.007), apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III) (P 5 0.009), and all the components of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, including VLDL triglycerides (P 5 0.002), VLDL-cholesterol (P 5 0.001), and VLDL apoB (P 5 0.001). FABP4 was inversely correlated with apoA-I (P 5 0.038), HDL-cholesterol (P 5 0.002), and HDL apoA-I (P 5 0.010) in type 2 diabetic subjects. These correlations are not significantly affected by age, gender, body mass index, adiponectin, insulin, or any pharmacological treatment. The associations are even stronger when the FABP4/adiponectin ratio is considered. None of these associations were observed in controls. High FABP4 and low adiponectin levels are independent predictors of atherogenic dyslipidemia. In conclusion, FABP4 plasma concentrations hold strong potential for development as a clinical biomarker for atherogenic dyslipidemia, independent of obesity and insulin resistance, in type 2 diabetic subjects.-Cabré, A., I. Lázaro, J. Girona, J. M. Manzanares, F. Marimón, N. Plana, M. Heras, and L. Masana. Plasma fatty acid binding protein 4 is associated with atherogenic dyslipidemia in diabetes. J. Lipid Res.