Pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) are toxic plant constituents occurring often in their N-oxide form. This raises the question on the relative potency (REP) values of PA-N-oxides compared to the corresponding parent PAs. The present study aims to quantify the in vivo REP value of riddelliine N-oxide compared to riddelliine using physiologically based kinetic (PBK) modelling, taking into account that the toxicity of riddelliine N-oxide depends on its conversion to riddelliine by intestinal microbiota and in the liver. The models predicted a lower Cmax and higher Tmax for the blood concentration of riddelliine upon oral administration of riddelliine N-oxide compared to the Cmax and Tmax predicted for an equimolar oral dose of riddelliine. Comparison of the area under the riddelliine concentration–time curve (AUCRID) obtained upon dosing either the N-oxide or riddelliine itself revealed a ratio of 0.67, which reflects the in vivo REP for riddelliine N-oxide compared to riddelliine, and appeared to closely match the REP value derived from available in vivo data. The models also predicted that the REP value will decrease with increasing dose level, because of saturation of riddelliine N-oxide reduction by the intestinal microbiota and of riddelliine clearance by the liver. It is concluded that PBK modeling provides a way to define in vivo REP values of PA-N-oxides as compared to their parent PAs, without a need for animal experiments.
Pathogenic bacteria and their biofilm formation are responsible for a broad spectrum of microbial infections. A novel enzyme-responsive reporter molecule (ERM-1), which can specifically recognize AmpC β-lactamase (Bla) in drug resistant bacteria, has been developed to enable the selective localization of biofilms.
Over 1,000 pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) and their N-oxides (PA-N-oxides) occur in 3% of all flowering plants. PA-N-oxides are toxic when reduced to their parent PAs, which are bioactivated into pyrrole intermediates that generate protein- and DNA-adducts resulting in liver toxicity and carcinogenicity. Literature data for senecionine N-oxide in rats indicate that the relative potency (REP) value of this PA-N-oxide compared to its parent PA senecionine varies with the endpoint used. The first endpoint was the ratio between the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for senecionine upon dosing senecionine N-oxide or an equimolar dose of senecionine, while the second endpoint was the ratio between the amount for pyrrole-protein adducts formed under these conditions. This study aimed to investigate the mode of action underlying this endpoint dependent REP value for senecionine N-oxide with physiologically based kinetic (PBK) modeling. Results obtained reveal that limitation of 7-GS-DHP adduct formation due to GSH depletion, resulting in increased pyrrole-protein adduct formation, occurs more likely upon high dose oral PA administration than upon an equimolar dose of PA-N-oxide. At high dose levels, this results in a lower REP value when based on pyrrole-protein adduct levels than when based on PA concentrations. At low dose levels, the difference no longer exists. Altogether, the results of the study show how the REP value for senecionine N-oxide depends on dose and endpoint used, and that PBK modeling provides a way to characterize REP values for PA-N-oxides at realistic low dietary exposure levels, thus reducing the need for animal experiments.
Scope
This study aims to determine if previously developed physiologically‐based kinetic (PBK) model in rat can be modified for senecionine (SEN) and its N‐oxide (SENO), and be used to investigate potential species differences between rat and human in relative potency (REP) of the N‐oxide relative to the parent pyrrolizidine alkaloid (PA).
Methods and results
In vitro derived kinetic parameters including the apparent maximum velocities (Vmax) and Michaelis–Menten constants (Km) for SENO reduction and SEN clearance are used to define the PBK models. The rat model is validated with published animal data, and the toxicokinetic profiles of SEN from either orally‐administered SENO or SEN are simulated. REP values of SENO relative to SEN amount to 0.84 and 0.89 in rat and human, respectively.
Conclusion
The REP value can be dose‐ and species‐dependent, with the values for rat and human being comparable at low realistic exposure scenarios. In summary, PBK modeling serves as a valuable New Approach Methodology (NAM) tool for predicting REP values of PA‐N‐oxides and may actually result in more accurate REP values for human risk assessment than what would be defined using in vivo animal experiments.
Pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) are a large group of plant constituents of which especially the 1,2- unsaturated PAs raise a concern because of their liver toxicity and potential genotoxic carcinogenicity. This toxicity of PAs depends on their kinetics. Differences in absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) characteristics of PAs may substantially alter the relative toxicity of PAs. As a result, kinetics will also affect relative potency (REP) values. The present review summarizes the current state-of-the art on PA kinetics and resulting consequences for toxicity and illustrates how physiologically-based kinetic (PBK) modelling can be applied to take kinetics into account when defining the relative differences in toxicity between PAs in the in vivo situation. We conclude that toxicokinetics play an important role in the overall toxicity of pyrrolizidine alkaloids. and that kinetics should therefore be considered when defining REP values for
combined risk assessment. New approach methodologies (NAMs) can be of use to quantify these kinetic differences between PAs and their N-oxides, thus contributing to the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement) in animal studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.