Objectives1. To find out the incidence of feeding intolerance among preterm neonates.2. To compare the incidence of feeding intolerance between two groups of preterm (28-32wks and>32 -36wks).3. To compare the time taken for full enteral feeding between the two groups. AbstractBackground: Premature babies are prone to develop many complications. One of the common complications is Feeding Intolerance (FI).Though FI is a common problem, literature contains little information about the influence of prematurity on feeding intolerance. There is also scarcity of information regarding the prevalence of feeding intolerance among preterm babies.Objective: To compare the incidence of feeding intolerance and the association of comorbid conditions with feeding intolerance between two groups of preterm (28-32wks and >32-36wks). Methods:This study was an observational cohort study. All apparently stable preterm babies (28 to 36 weeks) admitted to SCABU (Special Care Baby Unit) was included in the study. The babies were stratified on enrolment into two groups according to gestational age of 28 to 32 weeks (group-1) and >32 to 36 weeks (group-2). Then feeding intolerance and other outcome variables were observed and compared between two groups Results: Total percentage of feeding intolerance among the study population was 36.7%. Feeding intolerance in group-1 and group-2 were 40.0% and 34.3% respectively. But the difference was not statistically significant. Mean days to reach full feeding of two groups were 19.8 days (group-1) and 11.5 days (group-2) respectively and the difference was significant (p=0.0001). Suspected sepsis had significant association with feeding intolerance (p=0.0003)Conclusion: Our study concluded that feeding intolerance was common in preterm infants and it is 36%. But very preterm babies had not significantly higher rate of feeding intolerance than moderate preterm. Among the co-morbid conditions only suspected sepsis had significant association with feeding intolerance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.