Stalling COVID-19 vaccination rates threaten public health. To increase vaccination rates, governments across the globe are considering using monetary incentives. We present evidence on the effect of guaranteed payments on COVID-19 vaccination uptake. We ran a large pre-registered randomized controlled trial (N = 8,286) in Sweden and linked the data to population-wide administrative vaccination records. We found that modest monetary payments of $24 (SEK 200) increased vaccination rates by 4.2 percentage points (p = 0.005), from a baseline rate of 71.6%. In contrast, behavioral nudges increased stated intentions to vaccinate but had only small and not statistically significant impacts on vaccination rates. The results highlight the potential of modest monetary incentives to increase vaccination rates.

No abstract

Coffee consumption after colectomy was safe and was associated with a reduced time to first bowel action.

Estimates of the prevalence of multimorbidity in medical inpatients based on administrative data, chart reviews and medical records were very high and congruent for the different definitions of multimorbidity. Agreement for rating multimorbidity based on the different data sources was moderate to good. Administrative hospital discharge data are a valid source for exploring the burden of multimorbidity in hospital settings.

In patients with lung cancer (LC), malignant melanoma (MM), gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NETs), and prostate cancer (PCA), lymph node (LN) staging is often performed by 18 F-FDG PET/CT (LC and MM), 68 Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT (GEP NET), and 68 Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT (PCA) but is sometimes not accurate because of indeterminate PET findings. To better evaluate malignant LN infiltration, additional surrogate parameters, especially in cases with indeterminate PET findings, would be helpful. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether SUV max in the PET examination might correlate with semiautomated density measurements of LNs in the CT component of the PET/CT examination. Methods: After approval by the institutional review board, 1,022 LNs in the PET/CT examinations of 148 patients were retrospectively analyzed (LC: 327 LNs of 40 patients; MM: 224 LNs of 33 patients; GEP NET: 217 LNs of 35 patients; and PCA: 254 LNs of 40 patients). PET/CT was performed before surgery, biopsy, chemotherapy, or internal or external radiation therapy, according to the clinical schedule; patients with prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy were excluded. SUV max analyses were based on uptake 60 min after tracer injection, and volumetric CT histogram analyses were based on the unenhanced CT images of the PET/CT scan. Results: PET findings were considered positive or negative on the basis of SUV max in the LN compared with that in the blood pool; histologic confirmation was not available. Of the 1,022 LNs, 331 were PET-positive (3 times the SUV max of the blood pool), 86 were PET-indeterminate (1-3 times the SUV max of the blood pool), and 605 were PET-negative (less than the SUV max of the blood pool). PET-positive LNs had significantly higher CT densities than PET-negative LNs, irrespective of the type of cancer. Conclusion: CT density measurements of LNs in patients with LC, MM, GEP NET, and PCA correlated with 18 F-FDG uptake, 68 Ga-DOTATOC uptake, and 68 Ga-PSMA uptake, respectively, and might therefore serve as an additional surrogate parameter for differentiating between malignant and benign LNs. The use of a 7.5-Hounsfield unit CT density threshold to differentiate between malignant and benign LN infiltration and 20 Hounsfield units to exclude benign LN processes might be possible in clinical routine and would be especially helpful for PET-indeterminate LNs. Oneoft he most widespread and reliable noninvasive staging tools for cancer is PET/CT-namely, 18 F-FDG PET/CT for lung cancer (LC (1,2)) and malignant melanoma (MM (1,3)), 68 Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/ CT for prostate cancer (PCA (4)), and 68 Ga-DOTATOC PET/ CT for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NETs (5)). An exact evaluation of lymph node (LN) status before therapy is crucial to therapy planning. False-positive PET findings are not uncommon with 18 F-FDG PET/CT, because the scan can mistakenly pick up on inflammation due to infectious etiologies, such as in the lung or the h...

Socially responsible behavior is crucial for slowing the spread of infectious diseases.However, economic and epidemiological models of disease transmission abstract from prosocial motivations as a driver of behaviors that impact the health of others. In an incentivized study, we show that a large majority of people are very reluctant to put others at risk for their personal benefit. Moreover, this experimental measure of prosociality predicts health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic, measured in a separate and ostensibly unrelated study with the same people. Prosocial individuals are more likely to follow physical distancing guidelines, stay home when sick, and buy face masks. We also find that prosociality measured two years before the pandemic predicts health behaviors during the pandemic. Our findings indicate that prosociality is a stable, long-term predictor of policy-relevant behaviors, suggesting that the impact of policies on a population may depend on the degree of prosociality.

No abstract

Financial incentives to encourage healthy and prosocial behaviours often trigger initial behavioural change1–11, but a large academic literature warns against using them12–16. Critics warn that financial incentives can crowd out prosocial motivations and reduce perceived safety and trust, thereby reducing healthy behaviours when no payments are offered and eroding morals more generally17–24. Here we report findings from a large-scale, pre-registered study in Sweden that causally measures the unintended consequences of offering financial incentives for taking the first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. We use a unique combination of random exposure to financial incentives, population-wide administrative vaccination records and rich survey data. We find no negative consequences of financial incentives; we can reject even small negative impacts of offering financial incentives on future vaccination uptake, morals, trust and perceived safety. In a complementary study, we find that informing US residents about the existence of state incentive programmes also has no negative consequences. Our findings inform not only the academic debate on financial incentives for behaviour change but also policy-makers who consider using financial incentives to change behaviour.