Background
Corticosteroid therapy (CST) prior to biopsy may hinder histopathological diagnosis in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Therefore, preoperative CST in patients with suspected PCNSL should be avoided if clinically possible. The aim of this study was thus to analyze the difference in the rate of diagnostic surgeries in PCNSL patients with and without preoperative CST.
Methods
A multicenter retrospective study including all immunocompetent patients diagnosed with PCNSL between 1/2004 and 9/2018 at four neurosurgical centers in Austria was conducted and the results were compared to literature.
Results
A total of 143 patients were included in this study. All patients showed visible contrast enhancement on preoperative MRI. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of diagnostic surgeries with and without preoperative CST with 97.1% (68/70) and 97.3% (71/73), respectively (p = 1.0). Tapering and pause of CST did not influence the diagnostic rate. Including our study, there are 788 PCNSL patients described in literature with an odds ratio for inconclusive surgeries after CST of 3.3 (CI 1.7–6.4).
Conclusions
Preoperative CST should be avoided as it seems to diminish the diagnostic rate of biopsy in PCNSL patients. Yet, if CST has been administered preoperatively and there is still a contrast enhancing lesion to target for biopsy, surgeons should try to keep the diagnostic delay to a minimum as the likelihood for acquiring diagnostic tissue seems sufficiently high.
OBJECTIVEIncomplete neurosurgical resection of brain metastases (BM) due to insufficient intraoperative visualization of tumor tissue is a major clinical challenge and might result in local recurrence. Recently, visible 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) induced fluorescence was first reported in patients with BM. The aim of this study was thus to investigate, for the first time systematically, the value of 5-ALA fluorescence for intraoperative visualization of BM in a large patient cohort.METHODSAdult patients (≥ 18 years) with resection of suspected BM after preoperative 5-ALA administration were prospectively recruited at two specialized neurosurgical centers. During surgery, the fluorescence status (visible or no fluorescence); fluorescence quality (strong, vague, or none); and fluorescence homogeneity (homogeneous or heterogeneous) of each BM was investigated. Additionally, these specific fluorescence characteristics of BM were correlated with the primary tumor type and the histopathological subtype. Tumor diagnosis was established according to the current WHO 2016 criteria.RESULTSAltogether, 157 BM were surgically treated in 154 patients. Visible fluorescence was observed in 104 BM (66%), whereas fluorescence was absent in the remaining 53 cases (34%). In detail, 53 tumors (34%) showed strong fluorescence, 51 tumors (32%) showed vague fluorescence, and 53 tumors (34%) had no fluorescence. The majority of BM (84% of cases) demonstrated a heterogeneous fluorescence pattern. According to primary tumor, visible fluorescence was less frequent in BM of melanomas compared to all other tumors (p = 0.037). According to histopathological subtype, visible fluorescence was more common in BM of ductal breast cancer than all other subtypes (p = 0.008). It is of note that visible fluorescence was observed in the surrounding brain tissue after the resection of BM in 74 (67%) of 111 investigated cases as well.CONCLUSIONSIn this largest series to date, visible 5-ALA fluorescence was detected in two-thirds of BM. However, the characteristic heterogeneous fluorescence pattern and frequent lack of strong fluorescence limits the use of 5-ALA in BM and thus this technique needs further improvements.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.