Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a serious complication of end-stage liver disease, occurring mainly in patients with advanced cirrhosis and ascites, who have marked circulatory dysfunction,1 as well as in patients with acute liver failure.2 In spite of its functional nature, HRS is associated with a poor prognosis,3  4 and the only effective treatment is liver transplantation. During the 56th Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, the International Ascites Club held a Focused Study Group (FSG) on HRS for the purpose of reporting the results of an international workshop and to reach a consensus on a new definition, criteria for diagnosis and recommendations on HRS treatment. A similar workshop was held in Chicago in 1994 in which standardised nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for refractory ascites and HRS were established.5 The introduction of innovative treatments and improvements in our understanding of the pathogenesis of HRS during the previous decade led to an increasing need to undertake a new consensus meeting. This paper reports the scientific rationale behind the new definitions and recommendations. The international workshop included four issues debated by four panels of experts (see Acknowledgements). The issues were: (1) evidence-based HRS pathogenesis; (2) treatment of HRS using vasoconstrictors; (3) other HRS treatments using transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPS) and extracorporeal albumin dialysis (ECAD); and (4) new definitions and diagnostic criteria for HRS and recommendations for its treatment.

No abstract

No abstract

This is a comprehensive guidance on the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of ascites and hepatorenal syndrome in patients with chronic liver disease from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD). It replaces the prior AASLD guideline on the same topic published in 2012 (1).This AASLD Guidance provides a data-supported approach to the management of ascites and hepatorenal syndrome. It differs from AASLD Guidelines, which are supported by systematic reviews of the literature, formal rating of the quality of the evidence and strength of the recommendations. In contrast, this Guidance was developed by consensus of an expert panel and provides guidance statements based on comprehensive review and analysis of the literature on the topics, with oversight provided by the AASLD Practice Guidelines Committee. The AASLD Practice Guidelines Committee chose to perform a Guidance on this topic because a sufficient number of randomized controlled trials were not available to support meaningful systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A. Introduction Burden of Cirrhotic Ascites and Hepatorenal SyndromeHepatic decompensation, defined by ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and portal hypertensive gastrointestinal bleeding, is an important landmark in the natural history of cirrhosis (2). Ascites is commonly the first decompensation-defining event, with 5%-10% of patients with compensated cirrhosis developing ascites per year (3). The development of ascites is associated with a reduction in 5-year survival from 80% to 30% (4), which is due in part to patients with ascites being prone to additional complications such as bacterial infections, electrolyte abnormalities, hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and nutritional imbalances, and consequently, further clinical decline (5). Patients with cirrhosis who develop clinically significant ascites and related complications should be considered for referral for liver transplantation (LT) evaluation and, where appropriate, palliative care (6).HRS is a late complication of cirrhosis that accounted for 3.2% of all hospital discharges related to cirrhosis according to a 2012 study based on a large inpatient health care database of patients representative of community hospitals in the United States (4). Moreover, the number of HRS discharges in the United States has increased significantly in the past 2 decades (7). HRS was also associated with high inpatient mortality (~46%), as well as longer lengths of stay and higher costs of hospitalizations, compared to cirrhosis discharges without HRS.

Bacterial infections are an important cause of mortality in cirrhosis but there is a paucity of multi-center studies. The aim was to define factors predisposing to infection-related mortality in hospitalized cirrhotic patients. Methods A prospective, cohort study of cirrhotic patients with infections was performed at eight North American tertiary-care hepatology centers. Data were collected on admission vitals, disease severity [MELD and sequential organ failure (SOFA)] scores], first infection site, type [community-acquired, health care-associated (HCA) or nosocomial], and second infection occurrence during hospitalization. The outcome was mortality within 30 days. A multi-variable logistic regression model predicting mortality was created. Results 207 patients (55 years, 60% men, MELD 20) were included. Most first infections were HCA (71%), then nosocomial (15%) and community-acquired (14%). Urinary tract infections (52%), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP, 23%) and spontaneous bacteremia (21%) formed the majority of the first infections. Second infections were seen in 50 (24%) patients and were largely preventable: respiratory, including aspiration (28%), urinary, including catheter-related (26%), fungal (14%) and C. difficile (12%) infections. Forty-nine patients (23.6%) who died within 30 days had higher admission MELD (25 vs 18, p<0.0001), lower serum albumin (2.4g.dL vs. 2.8g/dL, p=0.002), and second infections (49% vs. 16%, p<0.0001) but equivalent SOFA scores (9.2 vs. 9.9, p=0.86). Case fatality rate was highest for C. difficile (40%), respiratory (37.5%) and spontaneous bacteremia (37%), and lowest for SBP (17%) and urinary infections (15%). The model for mortality included admission MELD (OR: 1.12), heart rate (OR:1.03) albumin (OR:0.5) and second infection (OR:4.42) as significant variables. Conclusions Potentially preventable second infections are predictors of mortality independent of liver disease severity in this multi-center cirrhosis cohort.

and the CAPPS InvestigatorsLow serum sodium concentration is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with cirrhosis, but its prevalence and clinical significance is unclear. To evaluate prospectively the prevalence of low serum sodium concentration and the association between serum sodium levels and severity of ascites and complications of cirrhosis, prospective data were collected on 997 consecutive patients from 28 centers in Europe, North and South America, and Asia for a period of 28 days. The prevalence of low serum sodium concentration as defined by a serum sodium concentration <135 mmol/L, <130 mmol/L, <125 mmol/L, and <120 mmol/L was 49.4%, 21.6%, 5.7%, and 1.2%, respectively. The prevalence of low serum sodium levels (<135 mmol/L) was high in both inpatients and outpatients (57% and 40%, respectively). The existence of serum sodium <135 mmol/L was associated with severe ascites, as indicated by high prevalence of refractory ascites, large fluid accumulation rate, frequent use of large-volume paracentesis, and impaired renal function, compared with normal serum sodium levels. Moreover, low serum sodium levels were also associated with greater frequency of hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome, but not gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients with serum sodium <130 mmol/L had the greatest frequency of these complications, but the frequency was also increased in patients with mild reduction in serum sodium levels (131-135 mmol/L). In conclusion, low serum sodium levels in cirrhosis are associated with severe ascites and high frequency of hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome. (HEPATOLOGY 2006;44:1535-1542 I mpairment in body water homeostasis is a common feature of advanced cirrhosis. [1][2][3] This is characterized by a higher rate of renal retention of water in relation to sodium due to a reduction in solute-free water clearance. The consequent inability to adjust the amount of water excreted in the urine to the amount of water ingested leads to dilutional hyponatremia. In recent years, great advances have been made in the knowledge of the pathogenesis of reduced solute-free water clearance in patients with advanced cirrhosis. The inability to excrete an adequate amount of solute-free water in the urine is related to several factors, the most important of which is increased vasopressin release. A reduction of effective circulating volume due to arterial splanchnic vasodilation is considered the afferent factor leading to a baroreceptormediated nonosmotic stimulation of vasopressin release in cirrhosis. 4 Additional factors in the pathogenesis of hyponatremia in cirrhosis are thought to be reduced production of solute-free water due to a reduced sodium delivery to the distal tubule as a consequence of reduction of glomerular filtration rate and/or increase of sodium reabsorption in the proximal tubule. [4][5][6][7] Several studies in large cohorts of patients with cirrhosis have shown that the renal ability to...

The prognosis of decompensated cirrhosis resulting from chronic hepatitis B is poor, and the benefits of treatment with interferon are outweighed by serious side effects and by the risk of fatal exacerbation of disease activity. Lamivudine rapidly reduces hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA in serum to undetectable levels. We have treated 35 patients with chronic hepatitis B and decompensated cirrhosis with lamivudine 100 mg or 150 mg orally once daily. Pretreatment, all were positive for HBV-DNA in serum. Ten had Child-Pugh class B and 25 had Child-Pugh class C liver disease. Seven patients underwent liver transplantation within 6 months of treatment initiation, 5 patients died within 6 months, and 23 patients were treated for at least 6 months (mean ‫؍‬ 19 months). In a majority of these 23 cases, there was a slow but marked improvement in liver function, which was most apparent after 9 months of treatment, with a decrease in serum bilirubin from 67 ؎ 13 to 30 ؎ 4 mol/L (P F .05, baseline vs. 9 months), an increase in serum albumin from 27 ؎ 1 to 34 ؎ 1g/L (P F .05), and a decrease in Child-Pugh score from 10.3 ؎ 0.4 to 7.5 ؎ 0.5 (P F .05). Three patients developed resistance to lamivudine because of a mutation in the YMDD motif, but liver function did not deteriorate. We conclude that inhibition of viral replication with lamivudine results in a significant improvement of liver function in patients with decompensated HBV cirrhosis, but the long-term benefits remain uncertain. (HEPATOLOGY 2000;31:207-210.)

Obliterative lesions in portal veins (PVs) and hepatic veins (HVs) of all sizes are known to occur in cirrhotic livers. PV lesions have generally been attributed to thrombosis, but the pathogenesis of the HV (veno-occlusive) lesions is unknown. We have studied 61 cirrhotic livers removed at transplantation to clarify the prevalence, distribution, and pathogenesis of venous lesions, as well as the association of these lesions with other morphological features and clinical morbidity. Intimal fibrosis that is highly suggestive of healed HV or PV thrombosis was found in at least 70% and 36% of livers, respectively. The distribution of HV lesions was patchy and largely confined to veins between 0.1 and 3 mm in diameter, suggesting multifocal origin in small veins. PV lesions were more uniform throughout the liver, suggesting origin in large veins with propagation to the small veins. HV lesions were associated with regions of confluent fibrosis (focal parenchymal extinction), and PV lesions were associated with regional variation in the size of cirrhotic nodules and a history of bleeding varices. These observations suggest that thrombosis of medium and large PVs and HVs is a frequent occurrence in cirrhosis, and that these events are important in causing progression of cirrhosis.