BackgroundLittle is known about the achievement of low density lipoprotein cholesterol
(LDL-C) targets in patients at cardiovascular risk receiving stable
lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in countries outside Western Europe.MethodsThis cross-sectional observational study was conducted in 452 centres (August
2015−August 2016) in 18 countries in Eastern Europe, Asia, Africa, the
Middle East and Latin America. Patients (n = 9049) treated
for ≥3 months with any LLT and in whom an LDL-C measurement on stable LLT
was available within the previous 12 months were included.ResultsThe mean±SD age was 60.2 ± 11.7 years, 55.0% of patients were men and the
mean ± SD LDL-C value on LLT was 2.6 ± 1.3 mmol/L (101.0 ± 49.2 mg/dL). At
enrolment, 97.9% of patients were receiving a statin (25.3% on high
intensity treatment). Only 32.1% of the very high risk patients versus 51.9%
of the high risk and 55.7% of the moderate risk patients achieved their
LDL-C goals. On multivariable analysis, factors independently associated
with not achieving LDL-C goals were no (versus lower dose) statin therapy, a
higher (versus lower) dose of statin, statin intolerance, overweight and
obesity, female sex, neurocognitive disorders, level of cardiovascular risk,
LDL-C value unknown at diagnosis, high blood pressure and current smoking.
Diabetes was associated with a lower risk of not achieving LDL-C goals.ConclusionsThese observational data suggest that the achievement of LDL-C goals is
suboptimal in selected countries outside Western Europe. Efforts are needed
to improve the management of patients using combination therapy and/or more
intensive LLTs.
Summary This primary care database survey evaluated whether osteoporotic women treated with bisphosphonates were more adherent to monthly than to weekly treatment. Both compliance (medication possession ratio [MPR]) and persistence (time to discontinuation) were superior in the monthly ibandronate treatment group. Better control of fracture risk may thus be achieved using monthly treatment regimens. Introduction Treatment adherence in osteoporosis is poor. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether monthly bisphosphonate treatment provided superior adherence than weekly treatment. Methods We analysed medical claims from a national prescription database (Thales). All women aged >45 years receiving a first prescription of monthly ibandronate or weekly bisphosphonates in 2007 were included. Treatment adherence was monitored from initial prescription until January 2008. Compliance was measured by the MPR and persistence by the time from treatment initiation to discontinuation. Multivariate analysis was used to identify variables independently associated with adherence. Results Twelve-month persistence rates were 47.5% for monthly ibandronate and 30.4% for weekly bisphosphonates. Compliance was significantly higher in the monthly cohort (MPR=84.5%) than in the weekly cohort (MPR=79.4%). After adjustment for potential confounding variables, women with monthly regimens were 37% less likely to be ) and presented a 5% higher mean MPR (84.5% versus 79.3%, p<0.001) than women with weekly regimens. Other major factors associated with improved adherence were previous densitometry and calcium or vitamin D supplementation (p<0.01). Conclusions Adherence to bisphosphonates may be superior for monthly treatment than for weekly treatment and may thus provide improved fracture protection.
Since the probability of VAVFL is positively associated with treatment duration, careful assessment of the risk-benefit ratio of continuing treatment with vigabatrin is recommended in patients currently receiving this drug. All patients continuing to receive vigabatrin should undergo visual field examination at least every 6 months for the duration of treatment. We recommend two-level (three-zone), gradient-adapted, suprathreshold static perimetry of the peripheral field together with threshold perimetry of the central field out to 30 degrees from fixation. The frequency of ophthalmological and perimetric examinations should be increased in the presence of VAVFL.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.