No abstract

Background Various metrics of hospital antibiotic use might assist in guiding antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). Objectives To compare patient outcomes in association with three methods to measure and feedback information on hospital antibiotic use when used in developing an AMS intervention. Methods Three methods were randomly allocated to 42 clusters from 21 Dutch hospitals: (1) feedback on quantity of antibiotic use [DDD, days-of-therapy (DOT) from hospital pharmacy data], versus feedback on (2) validated, or (3) non-validated quality indicators from point prevalence studies. Using this feedback together with an implementation tool, stewardship teams systematically developed and performed improvement strategies. The hospital length of stay (LOS) was the primary outcome and secondary outcomes included DOT, ICU stay and hospital mortality. Data were collected before (February–May 2015) and after (February–May 2017) the intervention period. Results The geometric mean hospital LOS decreased from 9.5 days (95% CI 8.9–10.1, 4245 patients) at baseline to 9.0 days (95% CI 8.5–9.6, 4195 patients) after intervention (P < 0.001). No differences in effect on LOS or secondary outcomes were found between methods. Feedback on quality of antibiotic use was used more often to identify improvement targets and was preferred over feedback on quantity of use. Consistent use of the implementation tool seemed to increase effectiveness of the AMS intervention. Conclusions The decrease in LOS versus baseline likely reflects improvement in the quality of antibiotic use with the stewardship intervention. While the outcomes with the three methods were otherwise similar, stewardship teams preferred data on the quality over the quantity of antibiotic use.

Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) is a complex genetic syndrome combining hypotonia, hyperphagia, a PWS-specific neurocognitive phenotype, and pituitary hormone deficiencies, including hypothyroidism. The low muscle mass associated with PWS causes a low energy expenditure due to a low basal metabolic rate. Combined with increased energy intake due to hyperphagia, this results in a high risk of obesity and associated cardiovascular disease. To reduce the high mortality in PWS (3% yearly), exercise is extremely important. As hypothyroidism can impair exercise tolerance, early detection is crucial. We performed a literature search for articles on hypothyroidism in PWS, measured thyroid hormone (TH) levels in 122 adults with PWS, and performed a medical file search for medication use. Hypothyroidism (low free thyroxin) was present in 17%, and often central in origin (80%). Triiodothyronine levels were lower in patients who used psychotropic drugs, while other TH levels were similar. One in six patients in our cohort of adults with PWS had hypothyroidism, which is more than in non-PWS adults (3%). We recommend yearly screening of free thyroxin and thyroid-stimulating hormone levels to avoid the negative effects of untreated hypothyroidism on basal metabolic rate, body mass index, and cardiovascular risk. Additionally, we recommend measuring TH concentrations 3–4 months after the start of growth hormone treatment.

Patients with type 1 and type 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD) can be treated with desmopressin. Although a previous study has shown that the location of the causative VWF gene variant is associated with desmopressin response in type 1 VWD, the association between variants in the VWF gene and desmopressin response is not yet fully understood. Our primary aim was to compare desmopressin response in type 1 VWD patients with and without a VWF gene variant. Secondly, we investigated whether desmopressin response depends on specific VWF gene variants in type 1 and type 2 VWD. We included 250 patients from the WiN study; 72 type 1 without a VWF gene variant, 108 type 1 with a variant, 45 type 2A, 16 type 2M and 9 type 2N patients. VWF gene was analyzed with ion semiconductor sequencing and MLPA. Complete response to desmopressin was observed in all type 1 VWD patients without a variant, 64.3% of type 1 patients with a variant and 31.3% of type 2 patients (p<0.001). Despite a large inter-individual variability in desmopressin response, patients with the same variant had comparable desmopressin responses. For instance, in six type 1 patients with exon 4-5 deletion, mean VWF activity at 1 hour after desmopressin was 0.81 IU/mL with a coefficient of variation of 22.9%. In conclusion, all type 1 VWD patients without a VWF gene variant respond to desmopressin. In type 1 and type 2 VWD patients with a VWF variant, desmopressin response highly depends on the VWF gene variants.

No abstract