This retrospective study evaluated the clinical performance and the reasons for failure of anterior and posterior composite restorations placed by undergraduate dental students over a 3-year period. All cavities were restored using Prime & Bond 2.1 and TPH (Dentsply), according to the manufacturer's indications. One hundred and two patients who had received composite restorations by third and forth year undergraduate students were recalled and examined to analyze the quality of the restorations. The restorations were evaluated using the modified USPHS system. Two hundred and fifty-six composite restorations, 170 in anterior teeth and 86 in posterior teeth, were evaluated. Eighty-five percent of the restorations were considered satisfactory after 3 years. Class II and class IV restorations presented the highest prevalence of failure. Loss of the restoration and deficient marginal adaptation were the main causes of failure. No restoration failed due to secondary caries. Most restorations placed by dental students were considered satisfactory after long-term evaluation. Failure was more prevalent in larger restorations and was not associated with secondary caries.

No abstract

Reattachment of fragment is the preferred alternative to restore the fractured teeth, offering several advantages. Partial pulpotomy has demonstrated satisfactory results as a conservative treatment for pulp exposures because of trauma. This study reports a case in which the treatment of a complicated coronal fracture was accomplished by partial pulpotomy and reattachment of a dental fragment obtained from an extracted tooth using composite resin. The results show the feasibility of the conservative pulp therapy and the restorative approach.

Several treatments have been suggested to correct dentofacial abnormalities, including orthognathic surgery. The aim of the present systematic review was to assess the impact of orthognathic surgery on patient satisfaction, overall quality of life, quality of life related to oral health—and to orthognathic surgery in particular—among adult patients. Two investigators independently reviewed the available literature in the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, SciELO, EMBASE, Trip, and Google Scholar (gray literature) based on the keywords “orthognathic surgery” and “quality of life.” An analysis of bias was performed based on the MINORS (methodological index for nonrandomized studies). A total of 245 relevant studies were retrieved from the databases, and 6 additional studies were located after a manual search of the references. Following selection based on titles, abstracts, and full-text analysis, 30 studies were included in the present systematic review. To evaluate quality of life before and after orthognathic surgery, 12 studies applied the surgery-related Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ), 12 used the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), and 4 used the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Orthognathic surgery results in improvements in quality of life both physically and psychosocially after surgery and is associated with high rates of patient satisfaction.

O objetivo foi descrever a produção de serviços especializados em municípios brasileiros com e sem Centros de Especialidades Odontológicas (CEO) e estudar fatores associados. Para a coleta de dados, foram consultados: o Departamento de Informática do SUS, dados do Atlas de Desenvolvimento Humano do Brasil e do Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Utilizou-se regressão binominal negativa inflada de zeros para modelar taxas de procedimentos de endodontia, atenção básica, periodontia e cirurgia. Após controle por fatores sociodemográficos, os municípios com CEO apresentaram taxas maiores do que os sem, exceto para taxas de atenção básica. No modelo final, com variáveis de estrutura dos serviços, os municípios com CEO do tipo III tiveram uma taxa de procedimentos de endodontia 2,08 (IC95%: 1,26; 3,44) vezes maior que sem CEO. Das variáveis de estrutura, mais gastos em saúde e maiores taxas de dentistas no SUS estavam consistentemente associados a maiores taxas de quaisquer procedimentos. Os CEO parecem ter um efeito positivo na produção municipal de procedimentos especializados, particularmente para a taxa de procedimentos de endodontia, e esse efeito não é explicado por variáveis de estrutura.