The purposes of this study were to confirm that premolar extraction treatment is associated with mesial movement of the molars concomitant with an increase in the eruption space for the third molars and to test the hypothesis that such treatment reduces the frequency of third molar impaction. Lateral cephalograms, panoramic or periapical radiographs, and study models made before (T1) and after (T2) treatment and a minimum of 10 years postretention (T3) of 157 patients were selected from the postretention sample at the Department of Orthodontics of the University of Washington, Seattle. Treatment for 105 patients included the extraction of 4 premolars; the other 53 were treated nonextraction. These patients represented all the extraction and nonextraction patients in the sample who had at least 1 third molar at T1 or T2 and who showed evidence of full eruption or closure of the root apex at T2 or T3. Student t tests showed higher scores for third molar impaction (P <.01), less mesial movement of the molars from T1 to T2 (P <.01), and smaller retromolar space at T2 (P <.001) in both arches of the nonex patients than in the ex patients. Similarly, molar movement was more mesial from T1 to T2 in the maxilla (P <.01) and in the mandible (P <.05), and the retromolar space was larger in both arches (P <.001) of the patients with eruption than in those with impaction of the third molars. Our results suggest that premolar extraction therapy reduces the frequency of third molar impaction because of increased eruption space concomitant with mesial movement of the molars during space closure.

The NiTi and multistranded steel wires showed greater aligning capacity when compared with stainless steel wires.

Objective: To evaluate the force extension relaxation of different manufacturers and diameters of latex elastics subjected to static tensile testing under dry and wet conditions. Materials and Methods: Sample sizes of 15 elastics from American Orthodontics (AO) (Sheboygan, Wis), TP (La Porte, Ind), and Morelli Orthodontics (Sorocaba SP, Brazil) were used. Equivalent medium force products were tested-3/16, 1/4, and 5/16 inch lumen size from each manufacturer-making a total of 1080 specimens. An apparatus was designed to simulate oral environments during elastics stretching. Forces were read after 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hour periods using the Emic Testing Machine (Emic Co., Sao Paulo, Brazil) with 30 mm/min cross-head speed and load cell of 20 N (Emic Co). Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests were used to identify statistical significance. Results: Statistical differences between AO and the other brands were noted for all testing times. Significant variation in mechanical properties was observed in latex elastics from Morelli. Relationships among loads at the 0 hour time period were as follows: Morelli.AO.TP for 3/16 elastics (P 5 .0016), 1/4 elastics (P 5 .0016), and 5/16 elastics (P 5 .0087). Conclusion: Significant differences in force extension relaxation were noted for elastics from these manufacturers. Force relaxation over the 24 hour time period was AO.Morelli.TP for 3/16 elastics, AO.TP.Morelli for 1/4 elastics, and TP.AO.Morelli for 5/16 elastics. The force decay pattern showed a notable drop-off of forces during 0 to 3 hours, a slight increase in force values from 3 to 6 hours, and a progressive force reduction over 6 to 24 hours. (Angle Orthod. 2011;81:812-819.)

Objective: To evaluate the reproducibility of digital tray transfer fit on digital indirect bonding by analyzing the differences in bracket positions. Materials and Methods: Digital indirect bonding was performed by positioning brackets on digital models superimposed by tomography using Ortho Analyzer (3Shape) software. Thirty-three orthodontists performed indirect bonding on prototyped models of the same malocclusion using prototyped transfer trays for two types of brackets (MiniSprint Roth and BioQuick self-ligating). The models with brackets were scanned using an intraoral scanner (Trios, 3Shape). Superimpositions were made between the digital models obtained after indirect bonding and those from the original virtual setup. To analyze the differences in bracket positions, three planes were examined for each bracket: vertical, horizontal, and angulation. Three orthodontists repeated indirect bonding after 15 days, and Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to evaluate inter- and intraevaluator reproducibility and reliability, respectively. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the differences between bracket positions, and multivariate ANOVA was used to evaluate the influence of orthodontists' experience on the results. Results: Differences between bracket positions were not statistically significant, except mesial-distal discrepancies in the BioQuick group (P = .016). However, differences were not clinically significant (horizontal varied from 0.04 to 0.13 mm; angulation, 0.45° to 2.03°). There was no significant influence of orthodontist experience and years of clinical practice on bracket positions (P = .314 and P = .158). The reproducibility among orthodontists was confirmed. Conclusions: The reproducibility of digital indirect bonding was confirmed in terms of bracket positions using three-dimensional printed transfer trays.

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of oral/maxillofacial surgeons (OMFSs) and orthodontists to predict third molar eruption by examining a simple panoramic radiograph in cases where full spontaneous eruption occurred.MethodsPanoramic radiographs of 17 patients, 13–16 years of age, were obtained just after orthodontic treatment (T1), when the third molars were intraosseous. The radiographs at T1 were presented to 28 OMFSs and 28 orthodontists—who were asked to give a prognosis for the lower third molars on both sides (n = 34). The full spontaneous eruption of all third molars was clinically observed when patients were older than 18 years (T2). These teeth were clinically asymptomatic at T1 and T2.ResultsOMFSs decided by extractions in 49.6 % of cases while orthodontists in 37.8 % (p < 0.001), when the radiographs were examined at T1. Agreement between OMFSs and orthodontists was excellent (Kappa = 0.76, p < 0.0001), as well as intragroup agreement for both OMFSs (Kappa = 0.83) and orthodontists (Kappa = 0.96).ConclusionsDespite a remarkable agreement for third molar prognosis, orthodontists and OMFSs were unable to predict lower third molar eruption by examining a simple panoramic radiograph. Both indicated extractions of a considerable number of spontaneously erupted asymptomatic teeth.

Introduction: Anterior open bite is considered a malocclusion that still defies correction, especially in terms of stability. The literature reports numerous studies on the subject but with controversial and conflicting information. Disagreement revolves around the definition of open bite, its etiological factors and available treatments. It is probably due to a lack of consensus over the etiology of anterior open bite that a wide range of treatments has emerged, which may explain the high rate of instability following the treatment of this malocclusion. Objective: Review the concepts of etiology, treatment and stability of anterior open bite and present criteria for diagnosing and treating this malocclusion based on its etiology, and provide examples of treated cases that have remained stable in the long term. AbstractKeywords: Open bite. Etiology. Treatment. Stability.

ResumoObjetivo: avaliar, em mini-implantes de diferentes dimensões, os seguintes fatores: (a) torque de inserção, (b) torque de remoção, (c) torque de fratura, (d) tensão cisalhante, (e) tensão normal e (f) tipo de fratura. Metodologia: foram utilizados 20 mini-implantes autoperfurantes, 10 da marca SIN e 10 da Neodent com, respectivamente, 8 e 7mm de comprimento, todos com 1,6mm de diâmetro. Dos 10 mini-implantes de cada marca, 5 não possuíam perfil transmucoso e 5 tinham perfil de 2mm, formando 4 grupos: SIN sem perfil (SSP), SIN com perfil (SCP), Neodent sem perfil (NSP) e Neodent com perfil (NCP). Todos os mini-implantes foram inseridos em cortical óssea e removidos com micromotor acoplado a um torquímetro. Os mini-implantes foram, também, submetidos ao ensaio de fratura. Os torques de inserção, remoção e fratura, assim como a tensão cisalhante e normal calculadas, foram comparados entre todos os grupos pela ANOVA. O tipo de fratura foi avaliado em microscópio eletrônico de varredura. Resultados: verificou-se que o grupo NCP apresentou torque de inserção significativamente maior que os demais grupos, porém todos fraturaram durante a inserção (n = 2) ou remoção (n = 3). Não houve diferença entre os grupos para o torque de remoção. Para o grupo NSP, o torque de fratura foi significativamente menor do que todos os outros grupos. Todos os mini-implantes sofreram fratura do tipo dúctil. Conclusão: uma vez que não houve diferença na resistência mecânica de ambas as marcas, variando apenas a forma, conclui-se que a resistência à fratura pode ser afetada por esta variável.Palavras-chave: Implantes dentários. Resistência de materiais. Torque. Procedimentos de ancoragem ortodôntica.

AimTo verify the correlation between cone beam CT (CBCT) and spiral CT (SCT) images and direct measurement of the bone height and to verify whether bone thickness (BT) influences the accuracy of bone height measurement on CT.Setting and SampleOne hundred and fourteen measurements were obtained in 10 dry human mandibles.Materials and MethodsThe alveolar bone height was measured on volumetric and linear images.ResultsNegative, average and significant correlations (−0.622** to −0.489**) were verified between BT and the absolute error. When the alveolar bone thickness was at least 0.6 mm, the mean differences were 0.16 and 0.28 mm on linear images and 0.12 and 0.03 mm on volumetric images for CBCT and SCT. Additionally, these values ranged from −0.46 to 0.79 and −0.32 to 0.88 mm on linear images and from −0.64 to 0.67 and −0.57 to 0.62 mm on volumetric images for CBCT and SCT. When the alveolar bone thickness was less than 0.6 mm, the CT evaluation varied from −1.74 to 5.42 and −1.64 to 5.42 mm on linear images and from −3.70 to 4.28 mm and −3.49 to 4.25 mm on volumetric images for CBCT and SCT.ConclusionsSpiral CT and CBCT images demonstrate significant correlation with direct measurement for the alveolar bone height. Measurement of the alveolar bone labial and lingual to the mandibular incisors and canines presented higher accuracy when its thickness was greater than 0.6 mm. When the thickness was less than 0.6 mm, bone dehiscence can be diagnosed despite bone being clinically present.