Nivolumab was not associated with significantly longer progression-free survival than chemotherapy among patients with previously untreated stage IV or recurrent NSCLC with a PD-L1 expression level of 5% or more. Overall survival was similar between groups. Nivolumab had a favorable safety profile, as compared with chemotherapy, with no new or unexpected safety signals. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and others; CheckMate 026 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02041533 .).

No abstract

2596 Background: There is currently a paucity of treatment options for checkpoint relapsed patients who have had an initial response but subsequently progress. N803, a novel IgG1 Fc-engineered IL-15-complexed protein may rescue checkpoint activity in a checkpoint independent manner via its selective enhancement of natural killer cell (NK) and CD8+ T cell number and function, without stimulation of T regs and MDSCs. Methods: QUILT 3.055, (NCT03228667) a phase 2b study of N803 plus investigator choice CPI in 11 tumor types: NSCLC, SCLC, Urothelial carcinoma, HNSCC, Merkel cell carcinoma, Melanoma (single PD-1/PD-L1 CPI or w/ ipilimumab), Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), Gastric cancer, Cervical cancer, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/ mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) solid tumors, with a heterogeneous mix of prior therapies. We present interim data for 135 patients treated with CPI alone or in combination with chemotherapy as their most recent prior therapy. Trial inclusion required investigator assessed progression on last line of therapy, patients had either CR with relapse or partial response or stable disease for 6 months with progression as their most recent result of checkpoint therapy. Patients with hyperprogression or best initial response of progression were excluded. Subjects received N803 15mck/kg SC q 3 weeks in combination with the same checkpoint inhibitor on which they had their most recent progression. Results: Preliminary data from 135 patients (60% NSCLC) with treatment with checkpoint and N-803 following progression on the same checkpoint show CR 0%, PR 8%, Stable Disease 51%, Progression 29%, response unevaluable 12% to date. A PR or SD was seen in all subgroups. Median PFS 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.6,5.0). Median OS 13.8 months (95% CI: 11.8, 16.3) N-803 is well tolerated with grade 1-2 common N-803 treatment related adverse events (TRAE) were injection site reaction (68%), chills (32%) fatigue (26%), pyrexia (26%), flu-like illness (14%), nausea (12%) and no other individual AE > 10%. Grade 3 N-803 TRAE were 12% but no individual grade 3 AEs were greater than 5%. Conclusions: N803 demonstrates low toxicity in patients previously treated with CPI and promising efficacy of cessation of progression and induction of response and durable stable disease in patients who had previously progressed on a CPI containing regimen in multiple tumor types and different CPIs. Clinical trial information: NCT03228667.

Background: Fulvestrant is a potent estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist that has superior antitumor activity in preclinical models. Unfortunately, clinical data showed a more modest antitumor effect for fulvestrant and it is currently reserved for use after aromatase inhibitor (AI) failure in metastatic disease. Reasons for the disappointing clinical results of fulvestrant may be related to suboptimal dosing and possibly to growth factor signaling that may render breast cancer resistant to ER inhibition by fulvestrant. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is frequently aberrant in breast cancer and preclinical data suggest that it may mediate fulvestrant resistance. We rationalized that using RAD001, an orally active mTOR inhibitor, with fulvestrant may overcome resistance and prolong time to progression. Methods: We conducted a phase II trial of fulvestrant and RAD001 in postmenopausal women with metastatic ER positive breast cancer if they had progressed/relapsed after AI use within 6 months of enrollment. Fulvestrant is administered as a loading dose (500 mg IM d1, 250 mg day 14, 250 mg day 28 and monthly thereafter). RAD001 was initially given at 5 mg orally once daily in the first month to the first 5 patients in order to assess safety and tolerability, and then increased to 10 daily thereafter and for subsequent patients. Patients are required to have measurable or evaluable disease and have adequate performance status and organ function. Primary endpoint is time to progression (TTP) and secondary endpoints include safety, response rate, and tissue biomarker assessment. 40 evaluable patients are required to meet a median TTP of 7.0 months compared to 3.7 months for fulvestrant alone as reported in the EFECT trial. Patients are followed monthly for clinical and lab evaluation and imaging studies for tumor assessment are obtained every 2 months. Results: Median age at entry is 49 years (Range 40-71). To date, 11 patients have enrolled. 8 patients are off study; 7 because of disease progression, and 1 because of a serious adverse event-grade 3 renal failure. Most common adverse events to date are mucositis in 7 patients, rash in 5 and nausea in 3. Most common lab abnormalities are elevated cholesterol in 6 patients, hypokalemia in 5, elevated ALT/AST in 5, and hyperglycemia in 4. Most of the toxicities are grade 1. There were 4 serious adverse events reported; acute renal failure, acute cholecystitis, and two grade 3 vomiting events in the same subject. No grade 4 toxicities occurred. Overall, treatment is well tolerated. Current analysis reveals a median TTP of 389 days (13 months). Bayesian interim monitoring of TTP indicates >90% posterior probability of mean TTP greater than the null value of 3.7 months. Credible intervals and stopping bounds also indicate continuation of patient accrual. Conclusions: Combined RAD001 with fulvestrant in this trial shows promising antitumor activity in metastatic breast cancer and has manageable toxicity. The trial remains open for accrual and updated efficacy and toxicity data will be presented. Clinical trials that target endocrine therapy resistance are critical and can help patients avoid the early use of more toxic treatments. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-05.

BackgroundBintrafusp alfa is a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of the TGF-βRII receptor (a TGF-β ”trap”) fused to a human IgG1 mAb blocking PD-L1. Here we report cumulative safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) results from the global, phase 1b/2 INTR@PID LUNG 024 study (NCT03840915), which evaluated bintrafusp alfa in combination with chemotherapy (CT) in patients with stage IV NSCLC.MethodsAdult patients with stage IV nonsquamous or squamous NSCLC and an ECOG PS ≤1 were included. Cohorts A, B, and C included patients with no prior systemic therapy; patients in cohort D had disease that progressed with previous anti–PD-(L)1 therapy. Cohorts received bintrafusp alfa 2400 mg every 3 weeks intravenously in combination with CT for 4 cycles (A [nonsquamous only]: cisplatin or carboplatin + pemetrexed; B: carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel; C: cisplatin or carboplatin + gemcitabine; D: docetaxel) followed by bintrafusp alfa maintenance (monotherapy or in combination with pemetrexed in cohort A) for up to 31 cycles. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of bintrafusp alfa in combination with CT. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed during a 3-week observation period. Serial samples were drawn to assess serum concentration and calculate PK parameters by noncompartmental analysis.ResultsAs of the May 5, 2021, data cutoff, 70 patients received bintrafusp alfa in combination with CT. Of 35 patients included in the DLT analysis, 4 experienced 1 DLT according to a safety monitoring committee (data cutoff May 5, 2021; A: n=1/8; B: n=1/8; C: n=0/8; D: n=2/11). Cumulative safety data are reported in table 1. PK data were available for 67 patients (A: n=38; B: n=9; C: n=8; D: n=12). PK profiles were similar across cohorts and between patients who did and did not experience a DLT. Observed bintrafusp alfa first-cycle exposures (Cmax, AUC, and Ctrough) were consistent with the published population PK (popPK) model.1Abstract 465 Table 1Safety results from the INTR@PID LUNG 024 studyConclusionsThe safety profile of bintrafusp alfa in combination with CT was manageable and similar to that reported for ICIs in combination with CT, with the exception of TGF-β–related skin lesions known to occur with TGF-β inhibition. No new safety signals were identified and there were no treatment-related deaths. The PK profile was consistent with the predicted monotherapy popPK model, suggesting no victim DDI potential for bintrafusp alfa with CT.AcknowledgementsThe authors thank the patients and their families, investigators, co-investigators, and the study teams at each of the participating centers, at the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, and at EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA.Trial RegistrationNCT03840915ReferenceWilkins JJ, Vugmeyster Y, Dussault I. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of bintrafusp alfa in different cancer types. Adv Ther 2019;36:2414–2433.Ethics ApprovalThe trial was approved by each site’s independent ethics committee.

No abstract

Background: Afatinib is a selective, irreversible ErbB family blocker that has shown survival benefit in lung squamouscell carcinoma (SCC) patients. Pembrolizumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody to the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor, has also shown survival benefit in lung SCC. Concurrent inhibition of the PD-1 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathways represents a rational approach to improve responses and delay the onset of treatment resistance in lung SCC. Trial Design: This phase II, open-label, single-arm study (NCT03157089) is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of afatinib in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with stage IIIB/IV lung SCC that has progressed during/after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Eligible patients must have 1 target lesion (as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1) and must have not received previous immune checkpoint inhibitor/EGFR-targeted therapy. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and safety profile will be determined during a safety run-in with oral afatinib (starting dose, 40 mg/d) with intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks). In the main study, all patients will receive afatinib at the RP2D with pembrolizumab until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or for up to 35 cycles. The primary end point is objective response (complete þ partial response). Other end points include disease control, duration of objective response, progression-free survival, overall survival, tumor shrinkage, RP2D, and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory biomarker analysis will be performed. This study is being conducted in the United States, Spain, France, South Korea, and Turkey. Enrollment commenced in September 2017, with a target of 50 to 62 patients.

No abstract