Background and Purpose-Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are associated with endothelial repair after ischemia in cardiac or peripheral circulation. There are no reports of EPCs with cerebrovascular disease. We present our experience with EPCs in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Summary of Report-EPC counts differed significantly (PϽ0.001) between stroke patients (acute stroke: median 4.75 and range 0 to 33; stable stroke: median 7.25 and range 0 to 43) and control subjects (median 15.5 and range 4.3 to 50), independent of age.

Intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase improves reperfusion prior to endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke compared with alteplase. OBJECTIVE To determine whether 0.40 mg/kg of tenecteplase safely improves reperfusion before endovascular thrombectomy vs 0.25 mg/kg of tenecteplase in patients with large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized clinical trial at 27 hospitals in Australia and 1 in New Zealand using open-label treatment and blinded assessment of radiological and clinical outcomes. Patients were enrolled from December 2017 to July 2019 with follow-up until October 2019. Adult patients (N = 300) with ischemic stroke due to occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid, \basilar, or middle cerebral artery were included less than 4.5 hours after symptom onset using standard intravenous thrombolysis eligibility criteria. INTERVENTIONS Open-label tenecteplase at 0.40 mg/kg (maximum, 40 mg; n = 150) or 0.25 mg/kg (maximum, 25 mg; n = 150) given as a bolus before endovascular thrombectomy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was reperfusion of greater than 50% of the involved ischemic territory prior to thrombectomy, assessed by consensus of 2 blinded neuroradiologists. Prespecified secondary outcomes were level of disability at day 90 (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score; range, 0-6); mRS score of 0 to 1 (freedom from disability) or no change from baseline at 90 days; mRS score of 0 to 2 (functional independence) or no change from baseline at 90 days; substantial neurological improvement at 3 days; symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours; and all-cause death. RESULTS All 300 patients who were randomized (mean age, 72.7 years; 141 [47%] women) completed the trial. The number of participants with greater than 50% reperfusion of the previously occluded vascular territory was 29 of 150 (19.3%) in the 0.40 mg/kg group vs 29 of 150 (19.3%) in the 0.25 mg/kg group (unadjusted risk difference, 0.0% [95% CI, −8.9% to −8.9%]; adjusted risk ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.66-1.61]; P = .89). Among the 6 secondary outcomes, there were no significant differences in any of the 4 functional outcomes between the 0.40 mg/kg and 0.25 mg/kg groups nor in all-cause deaths (26 [17%] vs 22 [15%]; unadjusted risk difference, 2.7% [95% CI, −5.6% to 11.0%]) or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (7 [4.7%] vs 2 [1.3%]; unadjusted risk difference, 3.3% [95% CI, −0.5% to 7.2%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke, a dose of 0.40 mg/kg, compared with 0.25 mg/kg, of tenecteplase did not significantly improve cerebral reperfusion prior to endovascular thrombectomy. The findings suggest that the 0.40-mg/kg dose of tenecteplase does not confer an advantage over the 0.25-mg/kg dose in patients with large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke in whom endovascular thrombectomy is planned.

BackgroundTrials of fluoxetine for recovery after stroke report conflicting results. The Assessment oF FluoxetINe In sTroke recoverY (AFFINITY) trial aimed to determine if daily fluoxetine for 6 months after stroke improves functional outcome in Australasian and Vietnamese patients. MethodsAFFINITY was a randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in 43 hospital stroke units in Australia (n=29), New Zealand (4), and Vietnam (10). Eligible patients were adults with a clinical diagnosis of stroke in the previous 2-15 days and a persisting neurological deficit. Patients were randomised via a web-based system using a minimisation algorithm to once daily, oral fluoxetine 20mg or matching placebo for 6 months. Patients, investigators and outcome assessors were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was functional outcome, measured by the modified Rankin scale (mRS), at 6 months. The primary analysis was an ordinal logistic regression of the mRS at 6 months, adjusted for minimisation variables. Analyses were according to the patient's treatment allocation. The trial is registered with the ACTRN registry, number 12611000774921. FindingsPowered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation 1280 patients were recruited in Australia (n=532), New Zealand (n=42) and Vietnam (n=706) between 11 January 2013 and 30 June 2019; 642 were allocated fluoxetine and 638 placebo. Adherence to trial medication (mean 167 [SD 48] days) was similar between groups. At 6 months, mRS data were available in 624 (97.2%) patients allocated fluoxetine and 632 (99.1%) placebo. The distribution of mRS categories at 6 months was similar in the fluoxetine and placebo groups (adjusted common odds ratio 0.936, 95% CI 0.762-1.150; p=0.53), and consistent among all pre-defined subgroups. Compared to placebo, patients allocated fluoxetine had more falls (20 [3.12%] vs 7 [1.10%]; p=0.02), bone fractures (19 [2•96%] vs 6 [0.94%]; p=0.01) and epileptic seizures (10 [1.56%] vs 2 [0.31%]; p=0.04) at 6 months. InterpretationFluoxetine 20mg daily for 6 months after acute stroke did not improve functional outcome and increased the risk of falls, bone fractures, and seizures. These results do not support the use of fluoxetine to improve outcome after stroke.

STROKE IS A MAJOR CAUSE OF MORBIDITY and mortality in an aging population. The current understanding of the pathophysiology of atherosclerotic diseases, the most common cause of stroke, and the evidence for existing therapeutic interventions for the prevention of stroke are presented. Specifically, we review the evidence for antiplatelet agents, anticoagulants, antihypertensive medications, lipidlowering agents and carotid endarterectomy for stroke prevention. primary preventive measure, antiplatelet agents do not reduce the risk of ischemic stroke among patients without vascular disease. They are associated with an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio [OR] 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-2.10) 23 and major noncerebral hemorrhage (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.14-2.63 ). 24 The benefits of ASA in the secondary prevention of stroke have been well documented in the period immediately after a stroke 25 (Table 1). Long-term antiplatelet treatment after stroke shows an even more impressive reduction of 25 nonfatal strokes and 36 serious vascular events per 1000 treated over a 29-month follow-up period. 25 There appears to be no difference in efficacy between low (50 mg) and higher doses (up to 1500 mg) of ASA. 29,30 The combination of dipyridamole and ASA has been shown to reduce the relative risk of recurrent stroke compared with ASA alone 26 (Table 1). Dipyridamole inhibits platelet aggregation by increasing levels of cyclic adenosine monophosphate and cyclic guanosine monophosphate. The limiting factor in the use of the ASAdipyridamole combination is the latter's potential effects on coronary perfusion. Dipyridamole can cause coronary vasodilation, which results in increased blood flow to nonstenosed coronary arteries. The result is that myocardial ischemia may be provoked during exercise. As such, the current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend that dipyridamole not be used in patients with chronic stable angina. 31 However, this recommendation was based on shortacting dipyridamole, which also reduced myocardial ischemia in a similar number of patients in the study quoted by these guidelines. 32 With the use of sustained-release dipyridamole, no increase in cardiac events was observed in subjects with prior coronary artery disease. 33 Thienopyridines block adenosine-diphosphate-mediated platelet aggregation. Ticlopidine was the first of this class of drug to be studied for stroke prevention. One clinical trial demonstrated that patients treated with ticlopidine had similar rates of stroke as those treated with ASA 28 (Table 1). However, serious granulocytopenia associated with ticlo- Leukocytes localize in the earliest atherosclerotic lesions, binding to vascular cell adhesion molecules (VCAM-1) on the vascular endothelium and migrating into the intima. This initiates and perpetuates a local inflammatory response. Monocytes mature into lipid-scavenging macrophages and subsequently foam cells. T-lymphocytes express inflammatory cytokines, which cont...