It was long thought that solely three different transposable elements - the I-element, the P-element and hobo - invaded natural D. melanogaster populations within the last century. By sequencing the ‘living fossils’ of Drosophila research, i.e. D. melanogaster strains sampled from natural populations at different time points, we show that a fourth TE, Tirant, invaded D. melanogaster populations during the past century. Tirant likely spread in D. melanogaster populations around 1938, followed by the I-element, hobo, and, lastly, the P-element. In addition to the recent insertions of the canonical Tirant, D. melanogaster strains harbor degraded Tirant sequences in the heterochromatin which are likely due to an ancient invasion, likely predating the split of D. melanogaster and D. simulans. These degraded insertions produce distinct piRNAs that were unable to prevent the novel Tirant invasion. In contrast to the I-element, P-element and hobo, we did not find that Tirant induces any hybrid dysgenesis symptoms. This absence of apparent phenotypic effects may explain the late discovery of the Tirant invasion. Recent Tirant insertions were found in all investigated natural populations. Populations from Tasmania carry distinct Tirant sequences, likely due to a founder effect. By investigating the TE composition of natural populations and strains sampled at different time points, insertion site polymorphisms, piRNAs and phenotypic effects, we provide a comprehensive study of a natural TE invasion.
In most animals, it is thought that the proliferation of a transposable element (TE) is stopped when the TE jumps into a piRNA cluster. Despite this central importance, little is known about the composition and the evolutionary dynamics of piRNA clusters. This is largely because piRNA clusters are notoriously difficult to assemble as they are frequently composed of highly repetitive DNA. With long reads, we may finally be able to obtain reliable assemblies of piRNA clusters. Unfortunately, it is unclear how to generate and identify the best assemblies, as many assembly strategies exist and standard quality metrics are ignorant of TEs. To address these problems, we introduce several novel quality metrics that assess: (a) the fraction of completely assembled piRNA clusters, (b) the quality of the assembled clusters and (c) whether an assembly captures the overall TE landscape of an organisms (i.e. the abundance, the number of SNPs and internal deletions of all TE families). The requirements for computing these metrics vary, ranging from annotations of piRNA clusters to consensus sequences of TEs and genomic sequencing data. Using these novel metrics, we evaluate the effect of assembly algorithm, polishing, read length, coverage, residual polymorphisms and finally identify strategies that yield reliable assemblies of piRNA clusters. Based on an optimized approach, we provide assemblies for the two Drosophila melanogaster strains Canton‐S and Pi2. About 80% of known piRNA clusters were assembled in both strains. Finally, we demonstrate the generality of our approach by extending our metrics to humans and Arabidopsis thaliana.
Small RNAs produced from transposable element (TE) rich sections of the genome, termed piRNA clusters, are a crucial component in the genomic defense against selfish DNA. In animals it is thought the invasion of a TE is stopped when a copy of the TE inserts into a piRNA cluster, triggering the production of cognate small RNAs that silence the TE. Despite this importance for TE control, little is known about the evolutionary dynamics of piRNA clusters, mostly because these repeat rich regions are difficult to assemble and compare.Here we establish a framework for studying the evolution of piRNA clusters quantitatively. Previously introduced quality metrics and a newly developed software for multiple alignments of repeat annotations (Manna) allow us to estimate the level of polymorphism segregating in piRNA clusters and the divergence among homologous piRNA clusters. By studying 20 conserved piRNA clusters in multiple assemblies of four Drosophila species we show that piRNA clusters are evolving rapidly. While 70-80% of the clusters are conserved within species, the clusters share almost no similarity between species as closely related as D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Furthermore, abundant insertions and deletions are segregating within the Drosophila species. We show that the evolution of clusters is mainly driven by large insertions of recently active TEs, and smaller deletions mostly in older TEs. The effect of these forces is so rapid that homologous clusters often do not contain insertions from the same TE families.
It is widely assumed that the invasion of a transposable element (TE) in mammals and invertebrates is stopped when a copy of the TE jumps into a piRNA cluster (i.e. the trap model). However, recent works, which for example showed that deletion of three major piRNA clusters has no effect on TE activity, cast doubt on the trap model. Therefore, we aim to test the trap model. We show with population genetic simulations that the composition of regions that act as transposon traps (i.e. possible piRNA clusters) ought to deviate from regions that have no effect on TE activity. Next, we investigated TEs in five D. melanogaster strains using three complementary approaches to test whether the composition of piRNA clusters matches these expectations. We found that the abundance of TE families inside and outside of piRNA clusters is highly correlated, although this is not expected under the trap model. Furthermore, we found that the distribution of the number of TE insertions in piRNA clusters is also much broader than expected, where some families have zero cluster insertions and others more than 14. One feasible explanation is that insertions in piRNA clusters have little effect on TE activity and that the trap model is therefore incorrect. Alternatively, dispersed piRNA producing TE insertions and temporal as well as spatial heterogeneity of piRNA clusters may explain some of our observations.
To prevent the spread of transposable elements (TEs) hosts have developed sophisticated defence mechanisms. In mammals and invertebrates this defence mechanism operates through piRNAs. It is unclear how piRNA-based defences are established against invading TEs. According to the trap model, a TE insertion into a piRNA cluster, i.e. a distinct genomic locus, activates the host defence. Alternatively, siRNAs, generated by cleavage of dsRNA, may be the trigger for host control. To investigate this we introduced the P-element, one of the most widely studied eukaryotic transposons, into naive lines of Drosophila erecta. We monitored the invasion in 3 replicates for more than 50 generations by sequencing the genomic DNA (using short and long-reads), the small RNAs and the transcriptome at regular intervals. A piRNA based host defence was rapidly established in 2 replicates but not in the third, where P-element copy numbers kept increasing for over 50 generations. We found that siRNAs emerged prior to piRNAs, supporting the view that siRNAs initiate host defence. However, neither insertions in piRNA clusters nor the formation of siRNAs were sufficient to stop the P-element. Instead the activation of the ping-pong cycle was shown to be crucial. We introduce a novel model, the crank-up model, which emphasizes activation of the ping-pong cycle as a critical event in establishing host control over a TE.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.