Combining polyester scaffolds with synthetic nanohydroxyapatite (nHAp), which is bioactive and osteoconductive, is a plausible strategy to improve bone regeneration. Here, we propose the combination of PBAT [poly(butylene-adipate-co-terephthalate)] and synthetic nHAp (at 3 and 5wt%). PBAT is a relatively a new polymer with low crystallinity and attractive biodegradability and mechanical properties for orthopedic applications, however, with a still underexplored potential for in vivo applications. Then, we performed a careful biological in vitro and in vivo set of experiments to evaluate the influence of PBAT containing two different nHAp loads. For in vitro assays, osteoblast-like MG63 cells were used and the bioactivity and gene expression related to osteogenesis were evaluated by qRT-PCR. For in vivo experiments, twenty-four male rats were used and a tibial defect model was applied to insert the scaffolds. Micro-computed tomography (Micro-CT) and histological analysis were used to assess e bone neoformation after 6 weeks of implantation. Three point flexural tests measured the mechanical properties of the neoformed bone. All scaffolds showed promising in vitro properties, since they were not cytotoxic against MG-63 cells and promoted high cell proliferation and formation of mineralized nodules. From a mechanistic point-of-view, nHAp loading increased hydrophilicity, which in turn allowed for a better adsorption of proteins and consequent changes in the phenotypic expression of osteoblasts. nHAp induced better cellular responses on/in the scaffolds, which was mainly attributed to its osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties. Micro-CT images showed that nHAp at 3% and 5wt% led to more effective bone formation, presenting the highest bone volume after 6 weeks of implantation. Considering the three point flexural tests, 5wt% of nHAp positively influenced the flexural mode of the neoformed bone, but the stiffiness was similar between the 3% and 5wt% groups. In summary, this investigation demonstrated great potential for the application of these novel scaffolds towards bone regeneration and, thus, should be further studied.
Electrospinning is a well-recognized technique for producing nanostructured fibers with different functionalities, generating materials that are able to support cell adhesion and further proliferation.
Bioprinting technology has emerged as an important approach to bone and cartilage tissue engineering applications, because it allows the printing of scaffolds loaded with various components, such as cells, growth factors, or drugs. In this context, the bone has a very complex architecture containing highly vascularized and calcified tissues, while cartilage is avascular and has low cellularity and few nutrients. Owing to this complexity, the repair and regeneration of these tissues are highly challenging. Identification of the appropriate biomaterial and fabrication technologies can provide sustainable solutions to this challenge. Here, nanosized Laponite® (Laponite is a trademark of the company BYK Additives Ltd.) has shown to be a promising material due to its unique properties such as excellent biocompatibility, facile gel formation, shear‐thinning property (reversible physical crosslinking), high specific surface area, degrade into nontoxic products, and with osteoinductive properties. Even though Laponite and Laponite‐based composite for 3D bioprinting application are considered as soft gels, they may therefore not be thought exhibiting sufficient mechanical strength for orthopedic applications. However, through the merging with suitable composite and, also by incorporation of crosslinking step, desired mechanical strength for orthopedic application can be obtained. In this review, recent advances and future perspective of bioprinting Laponite and Laponite composites for orthopedic applications are highlighted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.